Re: what about 2.1.0 ?????

2004-01-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:51 PM 1/13/2004, Günter Knauf wrote: >do you still expect massive changes with APR 1.0 ? I have the sense that folks want to see: * platform neutral apr_poll() that works on apr_file_t's as well, since so many daemons and other applications will require this. Non trivial - but we may

Re: what about 2.1.0 ?????

2004-01-13 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi Bill, thanks for your reply! > Just so that everyone is on the same page, 2.1.0 will be an -alpha. If sure - I'm aware of this (and it's on my site too); but nevertheless there are now a lot of new things in 2.1-dev which people would already like to play with > and when > we think we a

Re: what about 2.1.0 ?????

2004-01-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Günter, Just so that everyone is on the same page, 2.1.0 will be an -alpha. If and when we think we are about done with post 2.0 development, we will finally release a 2.1.x-beta. That will become the codebase (after an iteration or few) of the Apache 2.2 release. We are moving twords the tried

what about 2.1.0 ?????

2004-01-08 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi all, now we have already tagged for two times, tested, and nothing happened - no 2.1.0 release is out yet. What's about a new third try with a following release this time??? I really wish we could have 2.1 out so that the users get a version number they can refer to; that makes bug reports