Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-03-03 Thread Danny Chan
k > > forward > > > to > > > > > supporting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --原始邮件-- > > > > > 发件人: > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-02-05 Thread Raymond Xu
; > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------原始邮件-- > > > > 发件人: > > > > "dev" > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-31 Thread Vinoth Chandar
untered such scenarios and look forward > to > > > supporting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --原始邮件-- > > > 发件人: > > > "dev" > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-20 Thread Raymond Xu
< > > danny0...@apache.org; > > 发送时间:2021年1月19日(星期二) 下午4:25 > > 收件人:"dev" > > > 主题:Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields > > > > > > > > Wondering if we should just take a b

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-19 Thread Pratyaksh Sharma
g; > 发送时间:2021年1月19日(星期二) 下午4:25 > 收件人:"dev" > 主题:Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields > > > > Wondering if we should just take a bunch of payload configs and > deprecate > these flags > > I have the same feeling, there are already so many config op

?????? [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-19 Thread ??????
+1??Currently we have encountered such scenarios and look forward to supporting ---- ??: "dev"

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-19 Thread Danny Chan
> Wondering if we should just take a bunch of payload configs and deprecate these flags I have the same feeling, there are already so many config options in Hoodie, the maintain work for developers or users is hard. Vinoth Chandar 于2021年1月18日周一 下午11:40写道: > +1 as well. > > Slightly orthogonal

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-18 Thread Vinoth Chandar
+1 as well. Slightly orthogonal point. Wondering if we should just take a bunch of payload configs and deprecate these flags? What I mean is : --source-ordering-field ultimately is used by the HoodieAvroPayload class (or its family). Our utilities expose these as flags for convenience, but its

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-18 Thread vino yang
+1, We have found that such flexibility is needed in some scenarios. Best, Vino Raymond Xu 于2021年1月17日周日 上午3:38写道: > Just want to discuss a small improvement for setting ordering fields. > For > - property `hoodie.payload.ordering.field` and > - deltastreamer --source-ordering-field > I think

[DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-16 Thread Raymond Xu
Just want to discuss a small improvement for setting ordering fields. For - property `hoodie.payload.ordering.field` and - deltastreamer --source-ordering-field I think it can be useful to support multiple fields (configured via a comma-separated list) to determine the order in some cases. This