"This has been done a couple of times."
Is someone using iBatis in conjunction with LDAP? I am aware of our
previous discussions. But, where is the implementation?
Brandon
On 2/12/06, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This has been done a couple of times. It was discussed on this lis
This has been done a couple of times. It was discussed on this list a
while back.
Cheers,
Clinton
Cimballi wrote:
Great ! It's more motivating to work when you know other people may
enjoy it ! ;-)
I hope language will not block me, my english is very poor ! Well, at
least I understand "co
Great ! It's more motivating to work when you know other people may
enjoy it ! ;-)
I hope language will not block me, my english is very poor ! Well, at
least I understand "computer" english, and I've got a big dictionnary
!
So Larry, like you said in LDAP each attribute can have multiple
values.
I think that would be very interesting. :-)
I did some work with LDAP recently, and think that having something
like SQL Maps for LDAP queries would be really useful. One thing I had
problems with was that the attributes are all name-value pairs - like
doing everything with Maps. ;-)
Semantically
I think it would be very interesting to have. We have discussed this
and it is an outside goal to possibly make ibatis map beyon SQL.
Brandon
On 2/11/06, Cimballi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if there is already an iBatis implementation for LDAP
> ? And if there is none,
Hi,
I'd like to know if there is already an iBatis implementation for LDAP
? And if there is none, should it be interesting to have ?
I've already used iBatis for database access, and now I'm working with
LDAP directories and I thought I should be able to use the same
logical architecture like fo
