2.2.0 GA, or 2.2.1?

2006-10-03 Thread Jeff Butler
As far as I know, the only issue with 2.2.0 relates to the JDBC/ODBC bridge driver. Is this enough to cause us to make a 2.2.1 release, or should we have a vote on making 2.2.0 GA with the caveat that there is a problem with the bridge driver? Personally, I'd be OK with calling for a 2.2.0 GA

Re: 2.2.0 GA, or 2.2.1?

2006-10-03 Thread Clinton Begin
I'd rather just do a 2.2.1 deploy, beta, vote for GA. It should only take a week or two to get 2.2.1 through. We just waited longer than normal for 2.2.0 for no good reason.Well, I had a good reason, I'm now a father of two! :-) Cheers,ClintonOn 10/3/06, Jeff Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far

Re: 2.2.0 GA, or 2.2.1?

2006-10-03 Thread Elliot Gage
Congrats Clinton!!! Elliot Gage Clinton Begin wrote: I'd rather just do a 2.2.1 deploy, beta, vote for GA. It should only take a week or two to get 2.2.1 through. We just waited longer than normal for 2.2.0 for no good reason. Well, I had a good reason, I'm now a father of two! :-)