Re: Brainstorming about Reactive Streams

Hi, First things first, let me clarify that I didn't request the feature myself so I'm not advocating it ;-) We have a vague proposition in a JIRA ticket, and my intention is to try give it some objective essence. The team can happily close the ticket with a "Won't Fix" if we feel that there's

Re: Brainstorming about Reactive Streams

Summarizing this: *Goal*: All data flow/stream in system adhere to “Reactive Streams” API, includes data ingestion, async computation, compute result/stream aggregation. *Benefits*: - Common interface for all data transfer/exchange/processing. - Streaming data ingestion can compose

Re: Brainstorming about Reactive Streams

It ' a nice feature to be included in the grid compute module , in my opinion . But I have a question : what difference we have with ComputeTask class in behavioral terms ? https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/compute-tasks 2015-09-23 16:45 GMT+02:00 Lalit Kumar Jha : >

Re: Brainstorming about Reactive Streams

Lalit, I don't think we are going to change our APIs to some 3rd party standards or even worse to some 3rd party library. There is already JCache from JSR-107 and I can't say we are 100% happy with it. Thus I can consider Reactive Streams to be an additional optional API but not `All data

Re: IGNITE-534 JMS 1.1 Streamer - Work completed

Yakov, everyone is an admin in readme.io. Are you saying you cannot login? D. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > Dmitriy, > > Can you please check that I am still admin in readme io? I cant review the > documentation for 1.4 > > --Yakov > > 2015-09-20

Re: SQL Hash indexes

As part of this discussion I want to talk about non-snapshotable indexes in general. There are few things we can do to improve performance of queries and indexing. 1. We can implement SkipList based index. Probably it will not be much faster than current SnapTree, but GC and Optimizer will feel

Re: ignite 1.4 status

Alexey, I have been running Vert.x cluster manager tests today. IGNITE-1171 doesn't reproduces anymore. But new problem was found: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1534 I'll try to create Ignite test for this problem. I hope you have some ideas about how to reproduce (stable) and

Re: Brainstorming about Reactive Streams

Gianfranco, Behaviour wise it is similar. In this, data (streams) processed by map into new stream and this new stream is processed by reduce stream. In RS, multiple such opeartions are composed. This is as per MapReduce, RS can exist alongside, by two means: 1. A new entity (reactive) in

Re: SQL Hash indexes

Sergey, Thanks for detailed explanation! I agree with your suggestion, let's do on-heap (points 1 to 3) first and then switch to off-heap. Can you please create a parent ticket with necessary subtasks, so we can properly track it in Jira? D. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sergi Vladykin

Re: Brainstorming about Reactive Streams

Yes, we should not modify existing API, to support backward compatability and richer functionality (the primary goal of product). It will be additional wrapper/interface available. This will also does not break anything and we can migrate slowly. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Sergi Vladykin

Re: ignite 1.4 status

Alex, I merged 1171 to 1.4 branch. We have very few tickets left. Guys, who is in charge of checking this - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-973? Please provide the update? Hopefully, we will release tomorrow. Thanks! --Yakov 2015-09-23 8:37 GMT+03:00 Alexey Goncharuk

Re: ignite 1.4 status

I'm working to reproduce IGNITE-973 On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > Alex, I merged 1171 to 1.4 branch. > > We have very few tickets left. > > Guys, who is in charge of checking this - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-973? Please provide

Re: ignite 1.4 status

I couldn't reproduce IGNITE-973 but would like to get a comment from the reporter. Maybe some points for testing of issue have been missed by me... On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > I'm working to reproduce IGNITE-973 > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:35

Re: [NOTICE] TeamCity is down

Cos, is it ok that none of the domain names mentioned in ticket responds? Even those with "dig" output. Created ticket for Ignite - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10484 --Yakov 2015-09-22 21:01 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik : > Something like this could be

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1536) Duplicate notification in continuous query

Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-1536: --- Summary: Duplicate notification in continuous query Key: IGNITE-1536 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1536 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-1536 - Removed duplicated continuous q...

GitHub user vkulichenko opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/104 IGNITE-1536 - Removed duplicated continuous query notifications You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1537) Near TX prepare future is completed early for LOCAL cache

Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-1537: Summary: Near TX prepare future is completed early for LOCAL cache Key: IGNITE-1537 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1537 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1535) Evicted entries still are presented

Sergey Kozlov created IGNITE-1535: - Summary: Evicted entries still are presented Key: IGNITE-1535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1535 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

Re: After setting streamer and ignite,getting NULL

Anton, Clone this repo https://github.com/chandresh-pancholi/ignite and run this class https://github.com/chandresh-pancholi/ignite/blob/master/modules/storm/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/stream/storm/IgniteStormStreamerSelfTestSuite.java You will get the Error saying "Oouch,Argument is Null"