Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-2670:
--
Summary: Add ability to perfom mass operations
Key: IGNITE-2670
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2670
Project: Ignite
Issue
Both, C++ and C# APIs are included with Ignite download. Links to the
documentation can be found on the Ignite website.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Mailingliste
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> I was just wondering where to find the promised C++ and C# client?
>
>
>
>
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2669:
---
Summary: IgniteCache.replace() returns false instead of true when
there is only one node
Key: IGNITE-2669
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2669
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2667:
---
Summary: Allow to start caches in PRIVATE and ISOLATED deployment
modes when BinaryMarshaller is used
Key: IGNITE-2667
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2667
Hi guys,
I was just wondering where to find the promised C++ and C# client?
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/C-and-NET-td2403.html
Many thanks
Wiesi ;)
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2666:
---
Summary: Node is not stopped when RingMessageWorker is interrupted
Key: IGNITE-2666
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2666
Project: Ignite
GitHub user VladimirErshov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/489
ignite-2649 added failing example
ignite-2649 added failing example
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/VladimirErshov/ignite
GitHub user agoncharuk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/488
Ignite 2610 - Fixed excessive memory usage in TTL manager
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/agoncharuk/ignite ignite-2610
Sergey Kozlov created IGNITE-2665:
-
Summary: NPE in GridCacheIoManager
Key: IGNITE-2665
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2665
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
Artem Shutak created IGNITE-2664:
Summary: Cache.invokeAll() return a map with BinaryObjects instead
of user objects.
Key: IGNITE-2664
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2664
Project:
Thanks,
And sorry for a little bit confusing test I provided.
2016-02-16 13:46 GMT+02:00 Vladimir Ozerov :
> Myron,
> Thank you for pointing this. it looks like we violate stream contract
> because regular Java ObjectOutputStream will return -1 in this case.
> Forwarding
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-2663:
---
Summary: ODBC: Add protocol version to protocol packet header.
Key: IGNITE-2663
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2663
Project: Ignite
Issue
Alex,
In ObjectOutputStream if you read byte array and still have some other data
in the stream, it will return you -1. So as I understand, from user
perspective it is normal to wait for -1. What do you think?
Vladimir.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2662:
--
Summary: .NET Core support
Key: IGNITE-2662
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2662
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New Feature
GitHub user isapego opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/487
IGNITE-2643: Removed ODBC memory leak. Added
maxConcurrentCursorsPerConnection param to OdbcConfiguration.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
I think, yes
--Yakov
2016-02-16 14:19 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Margorin :
> Should we use optional=false in @IgniteSpiConsistencyChecked ?
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016
Agree that this should be fixed. However, from the end-user perspective
this should never be an issue because at some point in future Ignite might
need to append some extra bytes to the Externalizable object layout, thus
reading beyond that limit will break the unmarshalling process.
If, by the
Myron,
Thank you for pointing this. it looks like we violate stream contract
because regular Java ObjectOutputStream will return -1 in this case.
Forwarding to dev list.
Igniters,
As Myron mentioned, out implementation of ObjectInput returns 0 when
performing ObjectInput.read(byte[]) and there is
Should we use optional=false in @IgniteSpiConsistencyChecked ?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Yakov Zhdanov
> wrote:
>
> > Let's require that all nodes should have
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-2661:
---
Summary: CPP: Add documentation for Apache Ignite C++
Key: IGNITE-2661
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2661
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Done https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2660
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Anton,
>
> If there is no deserialization for binary marshaller, then I would treat it
> as a low priority issue. We should file a ticket and get to it when
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-2660:
Summary: Correct Grid behavior at key deserialization failure
during rebalancing
Key: IGNITE-2660
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2660
Sounds good to me.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Let's require that all nodes should have same swap space SPI. I think we
> can put @GridSpiConsistencyChecked on file swap space SPI (any other
> suggestions?).
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-02-15 23:31
Let's require that all nodes should have same swap space SPI. I think we
can put @GridSpiConsistencyChecked on file swap space SPI (any other
suggestions?).
--Yakov
2016-02-15 23:31 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Margorin :
> Probably I can handle this ticket, but I want to clarify one
Anton,
If there is no deserialization for binary marshaller, then I would treat it
as a low priority issue. We should file a ticket and get to it when it
becomes more critical.
D.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> I found such
Avihai Berkovitz created IGNITE-2659:
Summary: AssertionError in DirectByteBufferStreamImplV2
Key: IGNITE-2659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2659
Project: Ignite
GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/486
Ignite 2641
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dkarachentsev/ignite ignite-2641
Alternatively you can review and apply
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2658:
--
Summary: .NET: NHibernate Second Level Cache
Key: IGNITE-2658
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2658
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2657:
--
Summary: .NET: SqlDependency for cache items
Key: IGNITE-2657
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2657
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2656:
---
Summary: Documentation on debugging and fixing the reasons of node
disconnection from the cluster
Key: IGNITE-2656
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2656
This ticket is more about shaping up the code and will not have any visible
effect on the system. These two classes are very similar and I doubt if
inheritance that has been introduced there adds any value since
ConcurrentLinkedHashMap already has maxSize property. Anyway, it should be
a pretty
Dmitry,
I found such behavior at GridCacheRebalancingUnmarshallingFailedSelfTest.
Seems we always unmarshalling keys at supply message handling in case of
OptimizeMarshaller used.
Also it happens when BinaryMarshaller used but key class implements
Externalizable.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:43
32 matches
Mail list logo