Hadoop and hive not working after setting ignite igfs.

Hi team I am getting error after configuring ignite with hadoop and hive. when I try to run any hadoop cmd it show me this error. pawanpawar@cloud:~$ hadoop fs -ls -R / -ls: Fatal internal error java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2921) ScanQueries over local partitions are not optimal

Denis Magda created IGNITE-2921: --- Summary: ScanQueries over local partitions are not optimal Key: IGNITE-2921 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2921 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2920: IgniteError now derives from std...

GitHub user isapego opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/589 IGNITE-2920: IgniteError now derives from std::runtime_error. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/isapego/ignite ignite-2920

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2920) CPP: IgniteError should be derived from std::runtime_error not from std::exception

Igor Sapego created IGNITE-2920: --- Summary: CPP: IgniteError should be derived from std::runtime_error not from std::exception Key: IGNITE-2920 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2920

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2919) Visor CMD: Add ability to attach custom scripts to alerts

Denis Magda created IGNITE-2919: --- Summary: Visor CMD: Add ability to attach custom scripts to alerts Key: IGNITE-2919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2919 Project: Ignite

Re: Apache Flink <=> Apache Ignite integration

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Roman wrote: > Raul, > > Small comment from me. > > >* As a Flink sink => inject data directly into a cache via a DataStreamer. > After reviews, IGNITE-813 is exactly this functionality. > > That's cool, Roman! The idea would be to host

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2694 .NET: AnyCPU build

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/546 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2918) CPP: Add C++ test suits to TeamCity.

Igor Sapego created IGNITE-2918: --- Summary: CPP: Add C++ test suits to TeamCity. Key: IGNITE-2918 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2918 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Task

[GitHub] ignite pull request: GG-10988 : GridCacheConcurrentMap redesign.

GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/587 GG-10988 : GridCacheConcurrentMap redesign. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ilantukh/ignite ignite-gg-10988 Alternatively you

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2916) ODBC: Merge host and port into a single property.

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2916: --- Summary: ODBC: Merge host and port into a single property. Key: IGNITE-2916 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2916 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2915) ODBC: Remove fine-grained properties from OdbcConfiguration.

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2915: --- Summary: ODBC: Remove fine-grained properties from OdbcConfiguration. Key: IGNITE-2915 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2915 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-2914: Removed MakeDate and MakeTimesta...

GitHub user isapego opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/586 IGNITE-2914: Removed MakeDate and MakeTimestamp. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/isapego/ignite ignite-2914 Alternatively you

Apache Flink <=> Apache Ignite integration

Hello from the Apache Ignite community! Last year there was an interesting thread [1] about such integration. Unfortunately there's been little follow-through, so let's try and fix that in 2016 ;-) I'm sure a lot has changed in the Flink community, with the recent graduation and 1.0 release, so

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2913) SQL query with EXISTS() expression fails on partitioned cache.

Sergi Vladykin created IGNITE-2913: -- Summary: SQL query with EXISTS() expression fails on partitioned cache. Key: IGNITE-2913 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2913 Project: Ignite

Re: API for asynchronous execution.

I think this approach works unless user does not initiate number of concurrent cache operations greater than MSG_QUEUE_SIZE. Where msg queue size default is 1024, but still configurable. Thanks! -- Yakov Zhdanov, Director R *GridGain Systems* www.gridgain.com 2016-03-30 11:44 GMT+03:00 Vladimir

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2912) Implement support focus out to composite field

Dmitriyff created IGNITE-2912: - Summary: Implement support focus out to composite field Key: IGNITE-2912 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2912 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2911) ClusterGroup.forDaemons does not work

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2911: -- Summary: ClusterGroup.forDaemons does not work Key: IGNITE-2911 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2911 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

Re: API for asynchronous execution.

Vladimir, Communication should stop reading from connection is there are too many unprocessed messages. Sender will be blocked on putting message to queue. --Yakov 2016-03-30 11:11 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov : > Guys, > > Can you explain how backpressure control is

Re: API for asynchronous execution.

Guys, Can you explain how backpressure control is implemented? What if event arrival speed is greater than filter processing speed? On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Semyon Boikov wrote: > Andrey, > > I agree that current situation with threading in Ignite is very >

[GitHub] ignite pull request: Ignite-2730: Ignite Events Source Streaming t...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/560 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: API for asynchronous execution.

Andrey, I agree that current situation with threading in Ignite is very inconvenient when user callbacks execute some non-trivial code. But changing this to async dispatch is huge refactoring, even changing this just for continuous queries callback is not so easy task. We can start with

Re: JCache dependency

Just checked and our spec jar passes sigtest. Not sure for this week but think we can run a vote next one if nobody objects - don't hesitate to ping if nothing happens ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-03-30 9:20 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan

Re: JCache dependency

TCK does contain the sigtest: https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107tck/tree/master/sigtest Looking forward to getting the 1.0 version :) D. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le 30 mars 2016 01:45, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" a >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2910) VisorNodeDataCollectorTask should collect info about offheap and swap keys per partitions

Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-2910: Summary: VisorNodeDataCollectorTask should collect info about offheap and swap keys per partitions Key: IGNITE-2910 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2910

Re: Multimap implementation attempt

Hi Konstantin, Do you have any progress on this ticket? When do you plan to finish it? -Val On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > Hi Konstantin! > > I have added a comment to the ticket. > > --Yakov > > 2016-03-01 16:13 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Margorin

Re: JCache dependency

Le 30 mars 2016 01:45, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" a écrit : > > I just mention to mention that Apache Ignite passes JCache TCK with flying colors :) > True! Totally forgot tck were open! Didn't check sigtest, is it there too? If so nothing blocking a 1.0. > We have it integrated