Guys,
I feel very uneasy about proliferation of thread pools in Ignite. I suggest we
take step back.
Most of the users (including yours truly) have no idea how to correctly
configure the existing thread pools, what those thread pools are for (like,
management thread pool, or marshaller cache
Dmitry,
Current QueryMetrics collect metrics for all queries executed on cache
without distinguish them,
i.e. if you execute SCAN query and SQL_FIELDS_QUERY you will get single
metrics with 2 executions (and other counters).
I _added_ metrics that are grouped by query type and query text.
So,
Alexey,
I am a bit confused. I just looked at QueryMetrics API and it looks like a
subset of the QueryDetailsMetrics you are suggesting. Why not just expand
on QueryMetrics API we already have?
D.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
> Dmitriy,
Hi Saikat,
I added a comment in the ticket.
-Val
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Saikat Maitra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have raised PR[1] for the following jira ticket[2].
>
> Please review and let me know if any changes required.
>
> Regards,
>
> Saikat
>
> [1]
Hi,
I have raised PR[1] for the following jira ticket[2].
Please review and let me know if any changes required.
Regards,
Saikat
[1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1186
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4103
GitHub user samaitra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1186
IGNITE-4103 IgniteDataStreamer doesn't throw exception if cache is deâ¦
â¦stroyed
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-4110:
---
Summary: BlockingSslHandler does not properly handle
BUFFER_UNDERFLOW after unwrap
Key: IGNITE-4110
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4110
IGNITE-1915 is being reviewed, I think we can make it into 1.8.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> Looking at the discussions that happen on our dev list regarding Ignite's
> improvements I should say that we’re ready to prepare and roll out
Igniters,
Looking at the discussions that happen on our dev list regarding Ignite's
improvements I should say that we’re ready to prepare and roll out one more
Ignite minor release before the end of the year - Apache Ignite 1.8.0. My
proposal is to make it available by mid November, somewhere
Thank you Andrey.
Regards
Saikat
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Andrey Novikov wrote:
> Hi, Saikat
>
> I reviewed your pull request and add my comments to the ticket.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Saikat Maitra
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
Github user ptupitsyn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1185
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1185
IGNITE-4028 Get rid of OP_META in PlatformAbstractTarget
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4028
Hi, Saikat
I reviewed your pull request and add my comments to the ticket.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Saikat Maitra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have raised PR[1] for the following jira ticket[2].
>
> Please review and let me know if any changes required.
>
> Regards,
>
>
GitHub user kdudkov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1184
Ignite 2523
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-2523
Alternatively you can review and apply these
Github user ptupitsyn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1181
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user yzhdanov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1183
ignite-comm-balance
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-comm-balance
Alternatively you can review
Alper, thanks for clarification, this will definitely help after we get the
info I requested. This is the only way to go with the investigation.
--Yakov
2016-10-25 11:20 GMT+03:00 Alper Tekinalp :
> Hi Yakov.
>
> I should also mention that we load cache data from one server and
Hi Yakov.
I should also mention that we load cache data from one server and wait the
data to be replicated to others. Can that cause such a situation, too?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Alper,
>
> There can be multiple reasons.
>
> Can you please
Alper,
There can be multiple reasons.
Can you please reproduce the issue one more time, collect and share the
following with us:
1. collect all the logs from all the nodes - clients and servers
2. take threaddumps of all JVMs (from all nodes) with jstack -l
--Yakov
2016-10-25 10:49 GMT+03:00
Hi.
There is also a few logs as :
Failed to register marshalled class for more than 10 times in a row (may
affect performance).
Can it be releated?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> We have 3 servers and cache configuration like:
>
>
Hi all.
We have 3 servers and cache configuration like:
For our worker threads we check heartbeat and if a thread did not sent
heart beat for
21 matches
Mail list logo