Re: Regarding gsoc 2017

Hello, >>>On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Denis Magda wrote >>>Are you familiar with SWIG? > >>>http://www.swig.org > > >>> [] > I have read about it (just out of curiosity). I have never actually worked on it.

Re: Regarding gsoc 2017

BTW, Prakhar, Are you familiar with SWIG? http://www.swig.org It will be great if you can take Ignite's C++ API and SWIG to generate Python API that is missing in Ignite. How do you like this kind of task? It will allow you to learn all supported C++ API in details and

Re: Ignite ASF Confluence edit rights

Well, I don’t see any kind of admin panel on the Wiki. Cos, could you grant me admin rights there (dmagda)? Alexander, what’s the account name you use to login on the Wiki? — Denis > On Jan 23, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Yup, this is a contribution all

Re: Regarding gsoc 2017

Hello, Thanks for replying >>>On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > >>>Yes, we will submit several projects to GSOC. [...] > Is it possible to get involved in the pre-gsoc contribution, as I think it will help in understanding the project better . > >>>As

Re: Timeout for ordered message

Makes sense. I created a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4595 -Val On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > Val, let's do the following. > > 1. We need to state in javadocs that we expect unordered msg handler to be > added in advance,

Re: Apache Ignite SEO Audit

Dmitriy, I don't have admin rights; you do. You can follow the instructions here - https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2453966 -Prachi On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Prachi, would you be the one to help Mauricio here? > > On Mon,

Re: Apache Ignite SEO Audit

Prachi, would you be the one to help Mauricio here? On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Mauricio Stekl wrote: > No, I’m afraid I can’t use the same file. However it seems there was > already a GWT account setup for this domain then. So I could be granted > access to that

Re: Apache Ignite SEO Audit

No, I’m afraid I can’t use the same file. However it seems there was already a GWT account setup for this domain then. So I could be granted access to that account instead. Would that be possible? Thanks. Mauricio > On Jan 23, 2017, at 18:24, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:

Re: Ignite ASF Confluence edit rights

Yup, this is a contribution all right. Anyone with admin creds for the Ignite space should be able to go and add permissions to a person with Wiki account. Cos On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:43AM, Denis Magda wrote: > Dmitriy, Cos, > > Does contributors (not committers) have write permissions on

Re: Allow distributed SQL query execution over explicit set of partitions

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Alexei Scherbakov < alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dmitriy, > > This still can make sense for some scenarios, because we could limit number > of initial map requests reducing overall query overhead. > > Are you still sure we need to throw an exception ? >

Re: Ignite ASF Confluence edit rights

I actually don't remember what needs to happen in order to have edit permissions. I thought that being added as a contributor in Jira should be enough. Alex, have you registered on Apache Wiki? D. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Alexander Fedotov < alexander.fedot...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: Ignite ASF Confluence edit rights

Thanks. I'll do. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Dmitriy, Cos, > > Does contributors (not committers) have write permissions on Ignite wiki? > Looks like they don’t. > > Alexander, as a temporal solution, please ask the committer that reviewed > and

Re: Apache Ignite SEO Audit

Mauricio, we already have similar file added for google site verification: google9276fe2a42313afd.html Can you reuse this one? D. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Mauricio Stekl wrote: > Hi, > In order to setup the Google Webmaster Tools account on ignite.apache.org, >

Re: Apache Ignite SEO Audit

Hi Denis, Yes, in the docroot of the site so that the file could be access by visiting http://ignite.apache.org/googlea0d19c18a89c8306.html Thanks again. Mauricio > On Jan 23, 2017, at 17:23, Denis Magda wrote: > >

Adding ML to Ignite, IGNITE-4572

Igniters, I'd like to kick off the conversation on adding ML capabilities to Ignite as it relates to IGNITE-4572. I started off some preliminary steps on this ticket and would like to invite anyone interesting in implementing distributed core algebra on top of Ignite to join me in this work.

Re: Abandon of the non-throwing version of C++ client API

Guys, I found the initial discussion from the early times of our C++ client: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/C-exception-handling-strategy-td778.html Vovan, that time you were

Re: Apache Ignite SEO Audit

Hi, In order to setup the Google Webmaster Tools account on ignite.apache.org, I would need to upload the attached .html file to the root of the website. Could someone with commit privileges help me with this? Thanks in advance. Mauriciogoogle-site-verification: googlea0d19c18a89c8306.htmlOn Jan

Re: SQL: Index hints

Created a ticket so that we don’t forget about this new H2 capability. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4594 Alexander P. feel free to assign it on yourself. — Denis > On Jan 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan

Re: Regarding gsoc 2017

Hello Prakhar, Yes, we will submit several projects to GSOC. I planned to do it this week. Please keep an eye on this discussion [1] that will be updated going forward. As for machine learning this is [2] the first task related to this activity. Most likely Nikita will send some proposal to

Re: Ignite ASF Confluence edit rights

Dmitriy, Cos, Does contributors (not committers) have write permissions on Ignite wiki? Looks like they don’t. Alexander, as a temporal solution, please ask the committer that reviewed and merged your changes to update this page as well. — Denis > On Jan 23, 2017, at 2:22 AM, Alexander

Re: We are live on OpenHub!

Thanks Raul, Have you reported to OpenHub guys? If you haven’t I will go ahead with this. — Denis > On Jan 22, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Raúl Kripalani wrote: > > That's strange. Ordinarily it should update every 48h, have a look here and > maybe consider reporting an incident

Re: Allow distributed SQL query execution over explicit set of partitions

Dmitriy, This still can make sense for some scenarios, because we could limit number of initial map requests reducing overall query overhead. Are you still sure we need to throw an exception ? 2017-01-23 1:49 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan : > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:06

Re: SQL: Index hints

Very cool! Would be nice to add it to Ignite. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Sergi Vladykin wrote: > Guys, > > Recently in H2 we've merged a very important feature: index hints. It is an > additional MySQL-like syntax: > > SELECT * FROM my_table USE INDEX (index_a)

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4592) .NET: Binary enums are handled incorrectly

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4592: -- Summary: .NET: Binary enums are handled incorrectly Key: IGNITE-4592 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4592 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1455: IGNITE-2216: Added support for query fields disam...

GitHub user skalashnikov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1455 IGNITE-2216: Added support for query fields disambiguation You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite

Re: Make async API great again

Each compute method produces task. For 'run', 'call' etc. methods the classes of tasks are internal. There are tests checking the task session by ComputeTaskFuture for these methods. I think we have to leave real class of future is ComputeTaskInternalFuture#ComputeFuture to compatibility. The

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1454: Ignite 4003 1.7 no drop

GitHub user agura opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1454 Ignite 4003 1.7 no drop You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/agura/incubator-ignite ignite-4003-1.7-no-drop Alternatively you can

[GitHub] ignite pull request #555: IGNITE-2703 .NET: Dynamic class registration for n...

Github user ptupitsyn closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/555 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4591) File interop_target.h is missing from source-release

Igor Sapego created IGNITE-4591: --- Summary: File interop_target.h is missing from source-release Key: IGNITE-4591 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4591 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

Igor, I have thought about approach what you are talking about. It need add new field named like "sortedNodes" with custom ordering, which will have the same items as "nodes" field, because "nodes" has being used with default ordering in other methods. It have this advantages: 1. Method

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1453: IGNITE-4511: Set QueryIndexType.SORTED by default...

GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1453 IGNITE-4511: Set QueryIndexType.SORTED by default for an index Fixed You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite

Regarding gsoc 2017

Hello, My name is Prakhar Pratyush. I am a 4th year student at IIT Roorkee. My primary areas of interests are Machine Learning, and web development. I am willing to participate in gsoc during this summer. While searching for open source projects in machine learning, I stumbled upon this

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4590) Lock/unlock operations are hanging when topology changed

Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4590: Summary: Lock/unlock operations are hanging when topology changed Key: IGNITE-4590 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4590 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1452: IGNITE-4581: Async API: IgniteCache refactoring

GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1452 IGNITE-4581: Async API: IgniteCache refactoring You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4581

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4589) Possible starvation during rebalancing for marshaller cache

Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4589: Summary: Possible starvation during rebalancing for marshaller cache Key: IGNITE-4589 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4589 Project: Ignite

SQL: Index hints

Guys, Recently in H2 we've merged a very important feature: index hints. It is an additional MySQL-like syntax: SELECT * FROM my_table USE INDEX (index_a) WHERE A = 1 It will be very easy to support this in Ignite. Alex, Since you are working on better SQL Enum support and it will require H2

Re: Timeout for ordered message

Val, let's do the following. 1. We need to state in javadocs that we expect unordered msg handler to be added in advance, otherwise message get ignored. This may require user should have an ability to add listeners before start (same as in case with event listeners) - or can this be done in

Re: Abandon of the non-throwing version of C++ client API

+1 to Igor's idea. Ignite is relatively high-level product and we do not expect ultra-optimized users who cannot allow exceptions to be enabled. Macros should be a good workaround for them, though. On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Hi Igor, > > My C++

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1450: Ignite 4036 1 Fix. Near cache is not expired toge...

GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1450 Ignite 4036 1 Fix. Near cache is not expired together with corresponding server cache You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Ignite ASF Confluence edit rights

Hi folks, In scope of the IGNITE-3207 Ignite 2.0 Migration Guide needs to be updated Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide . Unfortunately, currently I don't have

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4588) .NET: Optimize BinaryReader frame handling

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4588: -- Summary: .NET: Optimize BinaryReader frame handling Key: IGNITE-4588 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4588 Project: Ignite Issue Type: