Re: IGNITE-2766 Spring Cache Manager ReConnect Issue

Hi Val, Sorry for the delay, I will work on the fix on weekend. Thanks, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Rishi Yagnik wrote: > Hi Val, > > I will work on it in my spare time.. > > Take Care, > Rishi > > > On Mar 13, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < >

Re: Can I let Ignite to do rebalance at a particular time?

Cross-posting to dev. Guys, Is there any reason for such implementation? Does it ever makes sense to trigger rebalancing on only one node? I think rebalance() method should broadcast automatically and do the job on all nodes. Just in case, we can also add localRebalance() method. This will be

Re: Compatible spark version for ignite

These are Spark and Scala versions used by ignite-spark 1.9 module by default: org.scala-lang scala-library 2.11.8 compile org.apache.spark spark-core_2.11 2.1.0 compile They are identical to yours. How do you run the example? What’s your IDE (IntellijIdea, Eclipse, etc)?

Re: IGNITE-2693 questions

Hi Oddo, Please look through this section that explains how to run tests on TeamCity: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-1.CreateGitHubpull-request

Re: jdbc vs jdbc2 packages

I'm against keeping legacy thin client because: - Having two ways to configure driver is unnecessary complication and very bad from usability standpoint. - It is much slower than client node, performance was the main driver behind its deprecation. What we should do, is improve usability of the

Re: Apache Ignite 2.0 Release

Hi Rishi, Yes, the fix will be in 2.0. -Val On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Rishi Yagnik wrote: > Val knows the issue well, the web session clustering we provide does not > work on spring boot at this point however in previous discussion, Val > mentioned that the fix

IGNITE-2693 questions

Hello, I am coming back to the IGNITE-2693 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2693) ticket and am at a bit of a loss. How do I go about getting all the errors thrown during the CI tests? Which test suite do I even choose? Thanks! Oddo -- Quiet waters dig through mountains

Re: Should we take care of Java 9 in Ignite 2.0 scope?

JB IDEA2017.1 released, support jdk 9. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:14 AM +0800, "Anton Vinogradov" wrote: Denis, I'm not sure, but javac usage seems to be not our but IDE "problem". No one call javac directly, AFAIK. So, any --add-exports can be added

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

Hi Vyacheslav, 1: Yes, exactly. 2: Hash code is written for all BinaryObjects. Starting with Ignite 1.9, hashCode implementations of original classes are never used to compute hash codes for corresponding binary objects. - Alex 2017-03-23 12:58 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur

Re: Should we take care of Java 9 in Ignite 2.0 scope?

Denis, I'm not sure, but javac usage seems to be not our but IDE "problem". No one call javac directly, AFAIK. So, any --add-exports can be added to wrapping maven, .bat/.sh or IDE settings. I'm pretty sure JB's IDEA will handle this right after Java9 release :) On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:19

cache entry invalidating

hi all ! why do we need to invalidate cache entry in org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxPrepareRequest#invalidateNearEntry(int, boolean) -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4859) .NET: Remove ICacheStore.SessionEnd

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4859: -- Summary: .NET: Remove ICacheStore.SessionEnd Key: IGNITE-4859 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4859 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1669: 12060 - fixed GridDhtInvalidPartitionException

GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1669 12060 - fixed GridDhtInvalidPartitionException You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-gg-12060

Re: Compatible spark version for ignite

Looks like it cannot find the scala library and/or wrong scala version is available to the application. > On 23 Mar 2017, at 09:08, Purushotham Muthuluru wrote: > > Hi , > > I am using Spark 2.1.0 with Ignite v1.9 , I get following error when I try to > run a example, I do

Re: strange GridCacheReturn

As per its description, it's: return value for cases where both, value and success flag need to be returned. But also it can transfer cache invoke results over wire. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:26 PM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV wrote: > Hi all! what is the use of

Re: strange GridCacheReturn

Object with value and success flag. It is used in futures to understand what is result of asyncronious action. 2017-03-23 13:26 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV : > Hi all! what is the use of GridCacheReturn ? > -- > > *Best Regards,* > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >

Re: prepare phase messages handlers question

No, it will not - when a prepare request is received by the node2, it will create a separate local instance of the transaction (GridCacheMapEntry is never serialized) and on node2 the entry will not be detached, thus not triggering the assertion. 2017-03-23 10:56 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV

strange GridCacheReturn

Hi all! what is the use of GridCacheReturn ? -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1668: IGNITE-4351 .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver...

GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1668 IGNITE-4351 .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1667: IGNITE-4839 Remove CacheTypeMetadata

GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1667 IGNITE-4839 Remove CacheTypeMetadata You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4839

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4858) TcpDiscoveryS3IpFinder.setAwsCredentials should not be be overloaded

Sangpil Yoon created IGNITE-4858: Summary: TcpDiscoveryS3IpFinder.setAwsCredentials should not be be overloaded Key: IGNITE-4858 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4858 Project: Ignite

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

Following second question. In which cases it needs to write postWriteHashCode? 2017-03-23 12:27 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur : > Hello everyone. > > Please, explain me, in which cases at marshalling after object header (24 > bytes) it needs to write Class.getName? > > I

Question about OBJ binary representation

Hello everyone. Please, explain me, in which cases at marshalling after object header (24 bytes) it needs to write Class.getName? I understand that it means that this class isn't registered in BinaryContext, and at deserializing we use it for loading Class with ClassLoader. Please explain real

Compatible spark version for ignite

Hi , I am using Spark 2.1.0 with Ignite v1.9 , I get following error when I try to run a example, I do not have scala installed on my mac I use the one that is embedded in Spark 2.1.0 which is Scala 2.11.8 What version of spark is compatible with Ignite v1.9? I am doing an evaluation of

Re: strange cacheEntry field

big thanx! ср, 22 мар. 2017 г. в 18:33, Alexey Goncharuk : > Hi Aleksey, > > This field tracks readers - objects which contain node IDs with near cache > which has read this key. If an entry contains a reader, this reader must be > updated as well alongside with

Re: prepare phase messages handlers question

in this case assert !entry1.detached() will throw exception ср, 22 мар. 2017 г. в 23:17, Alexey Goncharuk : > Yes, that is correct. Note, however, that in this case, node1 will send a > NearTxPrepareRequest to node2 and lockMultiple() will be called on node2, > not on

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4857) redis protocol not list at the document page

netroby created IGNITE-4857: --- Summary: redis protocol not list at the document page Key: IGNITE-4857 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4857 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

Re: Apache Ignite 2.0 Release

Denis, All the stuff you've mentioned is merged into H2 master. In Ignite we do some related work though. In addition I work on H2 result set generation improvements and will merge them soon as well. After that we'll try to release H2. Sergi 2017-03-23 6:12 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda