[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9285) [ML] Add MaxAbsScaler as a preprocessing stage

Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-9285: Summary: [ML] Add MaxAbsScaler as a preprocessing stage Key: IGNITE-9285 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9285 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9284) [ML] Add a Standard Scaler

Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-9284: Summary: [ML] Add a Standard Scaler Key: IGNITE-9284 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9284 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9283) [ML] Add Discrete Cosine preprocessor

Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-9283: Summary: [ML] Add Discrete Cosine preprocessor Key: IGNITE-9283 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9283 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9282) [ML] Add Naive Bayes classifier

Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-9282: Summary: [ML] Add Naive Bayes classifier Key: IGNITE-9282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9282 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9281) [ML] Starter ML tasks

Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-9281: Summary: [ML] Starter ML tasks Key: IGNITE-9281 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9281 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Wish

Re: [Distributed SQL] Do we have a plan to implement QuadTree index?

Sorry, for the delay, dear Pavel and Denis. Yes, I need a kind of indexing to improve KNN algorithms during training the model. In my draft solution I've implemented building of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-d_tree on the training data set. It collects

Re: Ignite running on JDK10?

Please keep using JDK 8 for now. JDK 9/10/11 is planned to be fully supported in the nearest time. -- Denis On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:31 AM KJQ wrote: > As a note, I downgraded all of the Docker containers to use JDK 9 (9.0.4) > and > I still get the same problem running the SpringBoot 2

Re: Ignite running on JDK10? (Maybe Solved)

JDK 10/11 is planned to be supported in the nearest time. Stay tuned. -- Denis On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:47 AM KJQ wrote: > Added the exports to the SpringBoot plugin seem to work for me in addition > to > having them in my compiler and surefire plugins...it at least starts up > Ignite and I

Re: Free Network Segmentation (akas split brain) plugin available

Hello Luqman, That's an excellent plugin! Copying the dev list so that everyone knows. -- Dneis On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 3:08 PM luqmanahmad wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently I was working on a project which required a very large number of > cluster over 700 nodes and we were encountering with

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9258) NodeJS - Fail to handle more than one client in the same app

Yes, already looking... Pavel On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Pavel, > > Could you please look into this issue? Guess we've got the first Node.JS > user even before it was officially released. > > -- > Denis > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Eran Betzalel

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9258) NodeJS - Fail to handle more than one client in the same app

Pavel, Could you please look into this issue? Guess we've got the first Node.JS user even before it was officially released. -- Denis -- Forwarded message - From: Eran Betzalel (JIRA) Date: Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:53 AM Subject: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9258) NodeJS - Fail to

Fwd: how ignite c++ node set baselinetopology

Igor, I think it's reasonable to add the baseline topology APIs to C++. Can you plan this for the nearest releases? Pave, do you have time to do the same for .Net? -- Denis -- Forwarded message - From: aealexsandrov Date: Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:23 AM Subject: Re: how ignite

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1662343] needs to be handled

Hi, Alex, please have a look, it may be interesting for you. AFAIK, extending of interface *ICompute* with a new method *WithNoResultCache* should be enough to fix the *ApiParity* test. It may require changes in XSD scheme. But it would be great if you'll find time to fully implement a new

Re: Code inspection

Hello Igniters. It seems that "idea/ignite_inspections.xml" should be excluded from "check-licenses" maven profile, because "_Licenses Headers_" configuration always fails now [1] on TeamCity. [1]

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4552: IGNITE-9267: Deadlock between unsuccessful client...

GitHub user BiryukovVA opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4552 IGNITE-9267: Deadlock between unsuccessful client reconnecting and stopping. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1662375] needs to be handled

Hi Ignite Developer, I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I hope you can help. *New test failure in master ComputeParityTest.TestCompute

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9280) Decrease WAL archive compaction latency

Andrey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-9280: Summary: Decrease WAL archive compaction latency Key: IGNITE-9280 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9280 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

Re: StandaloneWalRecordsIterator: support iteration from custom pointer

Agree, this should be a great performance boost. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > I agree that providing WAL pointer is the better option. Initially, > Standalone WAL iterator was developed for debugging utility, so a set of > files was perfectly OK. > >

Re: [GitHub] dspavlov commented on a change in pull request #1: MTCGA-002 Build trigger timeout.

Hi Igniters, do you know how to disable PR comments to be forwarded to dev.list? I think notification about PR creation is OK to be forwarded. But I'm not sure we need each comment to be forwarded to dev.list. WDYT? Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 20:39, GitBox : > dspavlov

[GitHub] dspavlov commented on a change in pull request #1: MTCGA-002 Build trigger timeout.

dspavlov commented on a change in pull request #1: MTCGA-002 Build trigger timeout. URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot/pull/1#discussion_r210347861 ## File path: ignite-tc-helper-web/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/ci/conf/ChainAtServer.java ## @@ -17,46

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4501: IGNITE-8493 GridToStringBuilder arrayToString ref...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4501 ---

[GitHub] xtern opened a new pull request #1: MTCGA-002 Build trigger timeout.

xtern opened a new pull request #1: MTCGA-002 Build trigger timeout. URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot/pull/1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1662343] needs to be handled

Hi Igniters, Failure related to recently merged change, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6284 I know how to disable this test failure, but probably we need method 'compute.withNoResultCache()' in .NET. What do you think? Who can help with adding such method to .NET API? Sincerely,

Re: Spark SQL Table Name Resolution

Here's the initial pull request for this issue, please review and let me know your feedback. I had to combine the two approaches to enable this to work for both standard .read() where we can add the schema option, and catalog-based selects where we use schemaName.tableName. Happy to discuss on a

[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1662343] needs to be handled

Hi Ignite Developer, I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I hope you can help. *New test failure in master ComputeParityTest.TestCompute

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4551: IGNITE-9228 Spark SQL Table Schema Specification

GitHub user stuartmacd opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4551 IGNITE-9228 Spark SQL Table Schema Specification You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/stuartmacd/ignite ignite-9228

Re: StandaloneWalRecordsIterator: support iteration from custom pointer

Hi Ivan, I agree that providing WAL pointer is the better option. Initially, Standalone WAL iterator was developed for debugging utility, so a set of files was perfectly OK. Sincerely, Dmitriy Palov ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 20:06, Ivan Rakov : > Igniters, > > Right now we are developing WAL

StandaloneWalRecordsIterator: support iteration from custom pointer

Igniters, Right now we are developing WAL shipping process for our internal purposes and we use StandaloneWalRecordsIterator to read WAL files from custom destination. We have bumped into a problem - iterator can be constructed from set of files and dirs, but there's no option to pass WAL

Volunteer needed: AWS Elastic Load Balancer IP Finders implemented

Hi Igniters, I took a look at the proposed contribution https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8617 and PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4076. I found this change reasonable and I can update code according to code style. But I would ask someone from the community with experience

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4550: IGNITE-9279: support custom default SQL schema.

GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4550 IGNITE-9279: support custom default SQL schema. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-9279

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9279) Support custom default SQL schema name.

Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-9279: Summary: Support custom default SQL schema name. Key: IGNITE-9279 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9279 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4534: IGNITE-9261: Added ANN algorithm and fixed bug IG...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4534 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4549: IGNITE-9277

GitHub user xtern opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4549 IGNITE-9277 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/xtern/ignite IGNITE-9277 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9278) ML TF integration: Can't find free ports in range

Stepan Pilschikov created IGNITE-9278: - Summary: ML TF integration: Can't find free ports in range Key: IGNITE-9278 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9278 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4542: IGNITE-9263 replace weird commit code.

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4542 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4075: Ignite 6284

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4075 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #2644: IGNITE-6284: Added compute withNoResultCache meth...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2644 ---

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9277) Split Cache 4 TC configuration.

Pavel Pereslegin created IGNITE-9277: Summary: Split Cache 4 TC configuration. Key: IGNITE-9277 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9277 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4548: IGNITE-9234 fixed javadocs

GitHub user oleg-ostanin opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4548 IGNITE-9234 fixed javadocs You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-9234 Alternatively you can

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9276) Multi-Get from NodeJS platform return empty or partial result

Eran Betzalel created IGNITE-9276: - Summary: Multi-Get from NodeJS platform return empty or partial result Key: IGNITE-9276 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9276 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4535: IGNITE-8919 Wrong documentation of exec methods i...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4535 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4490: IGNITE-1905: Fix AssertionError.

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4490 ---

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1657700] needs to be handled

Pavel, has a blocker for 2.7 been filed? On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > Hi Igniters, > > I think it is newly introduced failure. There are at least 3 series of > failures in recent runs. Could you please take a look? > > Please respond if you're already investigating

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9275) Introduce mechanism to fetch partition file via a p2p protocol

Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-9275: Summary: Introduce mechanism to fetch partition file via a p2p protocol Key: IGNITE-9275 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9275 Project:

Re: Code inspection

Hi Maxim, Thank you for stepping in. I've committed the first version here 'idea/ignite_inspections.xml'. We can move it to project default later when all inspection problems are fixed. Commit:

CacheStore and ignite.close

Hello! I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9093 test fix Turns out, IgniteDbPutGetWithCacheStoreTest.testReadThrough fails sporadically because the default ignite.close() is close(cancel=true), and it seems that it abandons cache store operations. So not all data is

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1607588] needs to be handled

The test is muted with the link to issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9213 вт, 14 авг. 2018 г. в 0:34, : > Hi Ignite Developer, > > I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. > I hope you can help. > > *New test failure in master >

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1657700] needs to be handled

Hi Igniters, I think it is newly introduced failure. There are at least 3 series of failures in recent runs. Could you please take a look? Please respond if you're already investigating these failures. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 15:34, : > Hi Ignite Developer, > > I am

Synchronous tx entries unlocking in discovery\exchange threads.

Hi Igniters, I've found Ignite node tries to unlock tx entries when a node left the grid. Ignite do this synchronously in GridCacheMvccManager.removeExplicitNodeLocks() in discovery and exchange threads. Looks like this can be done in ascync way. I've made a PR #4565 and seems there is no new

[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1657700] needs to be handled

Hi Ignite Developer, I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I hope you can help. *New Critical Failure in master Queries 1 https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_Queries1=%3Cdefault%3E=buildTypeStatusDiv No changes in

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4547: Tdr 26

GitHub user andrey-kuznetsov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4547 Tdr 26 To test on TC You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite tdr-26 Alternatively you can review and

[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [1657596] needs to be handled

Hi Ignite Developer, I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I hope you can help. *New Critical Failure in master Queries 1 https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_Queries1=%3Cdefault%3E=buildTypeStatusDiv No changes in

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4359: IGNITE-8060 IGNITE-8055 IGNITE-8100

Github user alamar closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4359 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3264: IGNITE-7165 Only cancel old rebalance future when...

Github user alamar closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3264 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4421: IGNITE-9044 Update scala dependency version in Ap...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4421 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4356: IGNITE-8761 WAL fsync at rollover should be async...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4356 ---

Re: Place Ignite TC helper to ASF Ignite supplementary git repo

Hi Igniters, I’m happy to announce Apache Ignite TeamCity Bot code was moved to supplementary ASF repository. Now MTCGA bot code is available in https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ignite-teamcity-bot.git and Github mirror for this repo is here https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot (wiki

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9274) Pass transaction label to cache events

Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-9274: --- Summary: Pass transaction label to cache events Key: IGNITE-9274 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9274 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4516: gg-14053

Github user AMashenkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4516 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #3092: ignite-gg-13017

Github user AMashenkov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3092 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4546: GG-13761

GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4546 GG-13761 For test purposes. To check if it is ok to remove entry explicit locks in async way when holder node has left the grid. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9273) IgnitePdsDynamicCacheTest.testRestartAndCreate is very flaky in master

Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-9273: --- Summary: IgnitePdsDynamicCacheTest.testRestartAndCreate is very flaky in master Key: IGNITE-9273 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9273