> I believe it has something to do with backward compatibility.That's what I
> would like to know.If there's no strong reason to set it to false, it should
> be as Ignite's default -- that's what a user would expect. And if the user
> changes the configuration at the cluster, he/she will be
Yury,
Thanks for the extra details. Agree that we should reuse logical and
physical terms if there are already in use by similar technologies.
-
Denis
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:52 AM Юрий wrote:
> Denis,
>
> As I understand logical and physical IO operations are standard terms which
> use
Vyacheslav,
Let me speak for the community and Ignite users and thank you for achieving
this milestone! Seems that the foundation for much bigger and impactful
improvements is ready. Tremendous job.
Are you going to start working on the services hot redeployment next?
-
Denis
On Wed, Jan 16,
Hi Igor,
Welcome to the Apache Ignite Community.
I've added you to the list of contributors, so now you can assign an issue
to yourself.
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Ignite
developers here.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
P.S. Let me share with you
Short 'How to
Hello Ignite Community!
I want to contribute to Apache Ignite, I am maintenance engineer, and I
can some Java, C# and Perl my JIRA username is "iakkuratov"
and i want to assign IGNITE-9907 to myself.
Thanks!
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-10972:
Summary: MERGE INTO hangs in MVCC mode with unsorted keys
Key: IGNITE-10972
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10972
Project: Ignite
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-10971:
Summary: SQL: Support partition pruning for distributed joins
Key: IGNITE-10971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10971
Project: Ignite
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-10970:
Summary: ATOMICITY table creation error message should include
TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT
Key: IGNITE-10970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10970
Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-10969:
-
Summary: Add Mvcc tests to RunAll.
Key: IGNITE-10969
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10969
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Test
Hello!
I have found one more relevant case:
[17:03:16,141][SEVERE][jdbc-request-handler-worker-#78][JdbcRequestHandler]
Failed to execute SQL query [reqId=0, req=JdbcQueryExecuteRequest
[schemaName=PUBLIC, pageSize=1024, maxRows=0, sqlQry=merge INTO
city2(id,name,name1)
Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-10968:
-
Summary: [ML] Create new ignite module SparkMLModelImport and add
LogRegression converter
Key: IGNITE-10968
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10968
Roman Kondakov created IGNITE-10967:
---
Summary: Assertion error in log during ExchangeFuture init
Key: IGNITE-10967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10967
Project: Ignite
Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-10966:
-
Summary: MVCC: Add scale factor support in Mvcc tests suites.
Key: IGNITE-10966
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10966
Project: Ignite
Ilya Borisov created IGNITE-10965:
-
Summary: Web console: in progress state for buttons
Key: IGNITE-10965
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10965
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
First of all, I do not like that thin client is silently returns null. It
should be fixed.
For the compact footer being set to false by default - I believe it has
something to do with
backward compatibility.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:37 AM Roman Shtykh
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
Yeah, I'll add it.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:08 PM Pavel Tupitsyn
wrote:
> > to every server
> I did not think of this issue. Now I agree with your approach.
> Can you please add an explanation of this to the IEP?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:53 PM Igor
Pavel Kuznetsov created IGNITE-10964:
Summary: SQL: Concurrent dml and alter table
Key: IGNITE-10964
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10964
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Ryabov Dmitrii created IGNITE-10963:
---
Summary: Cache 2 suite hangs on
CacheLockReleaseNodeLeaveTest#testLockNodeStop
Key: IGNITE-10963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10963
Denis,
As I understand logical and physical IO operations are standard terms which
use other DB vendors, for example Oracle -
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_oracle_logical_io_physical_io.htm , sometime
logical IO operation called as 'page/buffer hit'.
So I think current naming is ok.
WDYT?
Thank you for selecting ticket??I will take it.Can you please
provide me more detailed information about the task?
-- Original --
From: Vyacheslav Daradur
Date: ,1?? 16,2019 8:23
To: dev
Subject: Re: Hello everyone
Hi, Prehistoricpenguin!
It
20 matches
Mail list logo
