Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 3.0.0-alpha3 RC1

2021-10-12 Thread Saikat Maitra
+1 (binding) Regards Saikat On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:03 PM Denis Magda wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - > Denis > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Community, > > > > Ignite 3 development is moving forward. In the last

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 3.0.0-alpha3 RC1

2021-10-12 Thread Denis Magda
+1 (binding) - Denis On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Community, > > Ignite 3 development is moving forward. In the last several months we've > added the following features: > >- New SQL engine based on Apache Calcite + JDBC

[VOTE] Release Apache Ignite 3.0.0-alpha3 RC1

2021-10-12 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Dear Community, Ignite 3 development is moving forward. In the last several months we've added the following features: - New SQL engine based on Apache Calcite + JDBC driver. - Persistence implementation based on RocksDB. - New binary client protocol with an implementation in Java. -

IGNITE-15678

2021-10-12 Thread Eduard Rakhmankulov
Hello, Ivan! You've committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15678 recently, but after that C++ suites on TC suffer constant timeout [1][2]. Could you investigate what can be done to optimize test execution time? 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Custom service proxy context

2021-10-12 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Hi, Val >>The examples you mentioned are more related to internal activities (e.g., >> if authentication is handled by an Ignite server node, it can create its >> internal context for a connection - this is certainly reasonable). I'm only >> worried about exposing this to the end user. I'm