Nikolay, that's right, plugin framework allows to implement internal
components and use the internal API. There is a difference between a plugin
and an extension that uses only public API
Folks, can anyone explain the rush? Is there any specific reason for it?
I think we all agree that this is a
I think we can safely remove it.
-Val
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 11:52 PM Ivan Daschinsky wrote:
> Hi, igniters.
>
> Recently I've discovered one fact
> 1. GridShmemCommunicationClient and all shmem functionality are broken
> since 2.10. In master it is broken since August 2020. And nobody have
> n
I don’t understand how it possible.
Are you talking about plugin that uses some kind of internal API?
> 3 дек. 2021 г., в 18:50, Вячеслав Коптилин
> написал(а):
>
> Hello Nikolay,
>
> If I am not mistaken, the method you mentioned, allows to create a "user"
> cache that is available through p
Hello Nikolay,
If I am not mistaken, the method you mentioned, allows to create a "user"
cache that is available through public api for the user. This does not
cover the case when the plugin developer wants to hide such cache and
protect it form the end user (at least, via public api).
Thanks,
S.
Hi Igniters,
There is an issue to add ability to specify INLINE_SIZE for sorted index on
the primary key and index on affinite fields [1].
Please take a look at the last comment (proposal).
I duplicate the proposal here.
*Proposal:*
add to the public QueryEntity properties:
- Integer primaryKeyI
> What is the issue if third-party plugins will create «ignite-sys-cache»
from the code?
Great idea!
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:15 PM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Vyacheslav, Val, can you please clarify - What is the issue if third-party
> plugins will create «ignite-sys-cache» from the code?
>
> Like
Vyacheslav, Val, can you please clarify - What is the issue if third-party
plugins will create «ignite-sys-cache» from the code?
Like just replacing `Ignite#cache` with the `Ignite#getOrCreateCache`.
> 2 дек. 2021 г., в 16:13, Вячеслав Коптилин
> написал(а):
>
> Hello Maxim,
>
>> I don't und
Ok, TC suite is ready [1].
If there is no objections, I will merge it soon.
Possible concerns -- now it is required to install build-essentials and
libnuma-dev in order to build ignite on 64 bit linux.
I suppose that this is not a big deal, but maybe someone will contradict?
[1] --
https://ci.ig
It is the last point in the wishlist that probably nobody cares about.
I see no discussion at all, no @Deprecation annotations and a lot of
abandoned and broken code only.
пт, 3 дек. 2021 г. в 11:01, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Ivan,
>
> It seems shmem is already in the remove list [1].
>
> [1]
> https:/
Ivan,
It seems shmem is already in the remove list [1].
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 10:42, Ivan Daschinsky wrote:
>
> So if nobody wants it to resurrect, maybe it is worth removing it?
>
>
> пт, 3 дек. 2021 г. в 09:25,
10 matches
Mail list logo
