Thanks, Alex.
Could you tell at what branch you will add this?
Will you create an issue that I could track?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will add the check for non-get-named method if there are no objections, I
> see no reason for not
I will add the check for non-get-named method if there are no objections, I
see no reason for not having it.
2015-11-24 13:25 GMT+03:00 Roman Shtykh :
> +1 for adding support, particularly because in Scala we don't necessarily
> have get... and set... (an underscore can be used for that).
>
> Rom
+1 for adding support, particularly because in Scala we don't necessarily have
get... and set... (an underscore can be used for that).
Roman
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:39 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
Igniters,
I have such class in ignite-1.4
class Test(
@Id @ScalaCacheQuerySqlField
Igniters,
I have such class in ignite-1.4
class Test(
@Id @ScalaCacheQuerySqlField(index = true) val id: Long = 0L,
val name: String = null,
aStatus: ListStatus,
val ruleID: Long = 0L) extends Serializable {
private val intStatus = enumToByte(aStatus)
@ScalaCacheQuerySqlF
