Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Denis, I've checked the permissions now I can make changes. > I'm encouraging you to work with Kseniya's technical editors Thank you, we have already started working together. On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:00, Denis Magda wrote: > > Maxim, > > I had to grant you admin access in the blogging

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, I had to grant you admin access in the blogging settings. No you should be able to create an article and invite other members (log in with your apache ID): https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/members!save.rol Like the blog. (if you haven't done this yet, I'm encouraging you to

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Denis, I'm getting the following error while trying to create a new Weblog > Sorry, the blog administrator has disabled creation of new blogs. By the way, Nikita, Denis Can you review my blog post, please? https://github.com/Mmuzaf/mmuzaf.github.io/blob/main/_post/Release_Newsletter_210.md On

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, Check one more time. The infra instruction that you shared says a contributor needs to be in the Admin group in JIRA to get write access to the blog. I've added you to the Admin group. - Denis On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:00 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Denis, > > > I'd like to create a

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Denis, I'd like to create a post on the blogs.apache.org news feed with the 2.10 release news. Do I need additional privileges to do this? According to the wiki page [1] after login with my credentials, I should see the `add post` button, however, I can't find it on the main page. Am I missing

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, I've prepared a blog post about Ignite.NET changes [1], please link it in the main post. [1] https://ptupitsyn.github.io/Whats-New-In-Ignite-Net-2.10/ On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:15 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Denis, > > > Thank you. I'll prepare a blog post notes for the major 2.10

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Denis, Thank you. I'll prepare a blog post notes for the major 2.10 features. The release hasn't been announced yet, some artefacts still waiting to be published. Hope everything will be ready by the end of this week. > Btw, don't we want to arrange a meetup gathering for Virtual or >

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim, Ideally, a blog post should be published together with the announcement email. So that the readers can learn more details from the article. Anyway, you can post it later for 2.10 as long as the release is already completed. Btw, don't we want to arrange a meetup gathering for Virtual

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I've done almost all the release steps with publishing accepted changes. What should I do with an announcement blog post for blogs.apache.org? Should it also be prepared prior to an announcement message? On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 00:10, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Pavel, > > Thank you! I'll

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Pavel, Thank you! I'll prepare a new rc shortly. On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 23:20, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > > Maxim, thanks! > I've cherry-picked IGNITE-14293. > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:05 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > > Pavel, > > > > Sorry, my bad. Entangled in my local branches during

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, thanks! I've cherry-picked IGNITE-14293. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:05 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Pavel, > > Sorry, my bad. Entangled in my local branches during trying to > cherry-pick related commits. > I've reverted this change. > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 21:58, Pavel Tupitsyn

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Pavel, Sorry, my bad. Entangled in my local branches during trying to cherry-pick related commits. I've reverted this change. On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 21:58, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > > Maxim, > > I see that you have already cherry-picked IGNITE-13979 - was that > intentional? > If we keep it,

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, I see that you have already cherry-picked IGNITE-13979 - was that intentional? If we keep it, let's cherry-pick 14250 as well? On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:21 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Pavel, > > > I think it is better and safe to cherry-pick the `IGNITE-14293 .NET: > AffinityKey does

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Pavel, I think it is better and safe to cherry-pick the `IGNITE-14293 .NET: AffinityKey does not work` only. I will be very happy to accept your help with it. The IGNITE-13979 (.NET: Modernize examples) is very big and has some related issues too (most of them are fixed), so I think it is

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, Sure, I can assist with cherry-picks. 13661 is fixed by 13979 , as indicated by the "fixed by" link in Jira and a comment. IGNITE-14293 .NET: AffinityKey does not work

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Pavel, Can you assist a bit with the cherry-picking process of `.NET: AffinityKey does not work` IGNITE-14293? I'm not sure I can understand all the details of implementation and actually, I'm stuck a bit with the `.NET: Race condition in Events example` IGNITE-14250 [2] issue not sure what

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, No objections to those cherry-picks, please also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14293 Thanks! On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:54 AM Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > Hello! > > Unless we do extra checks for Windows environment, I suggest merging > IGNITE-14284

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello! Unless we do extra checks for Windows environment, I suggest merging IGNITE-14284 Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 9 мар. 2021 г. в 20:26, Maxim Muzafarov : > Folks, > > > Sharing the release status: > > .NET: AffinityKey does not

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, Sharing the release status: .NET: AffinityKey does not work - In-Progress https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14293 sqlline: `Property "url" is required' - Patch Available https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14284 sqllline: `Bad history file syntax!' - Resolved

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Igor, Many thanks for fixing the issue! I've cherry-picked it to the 2.10 branch. Folks, I'll finalize the latest changes for the documentation pages and prepare the rc build shortly. On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 21:08, Igor Sapego wrote: > > The following commit should be cherry-picked: >

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

The following commit should be cherry-picked: 0675e2a7e800730c9c8230332b82809754ddae5a Sorry for a delay. Best Regards, Igor On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:06 PM Igor Sapego wrote: > Maxim, > > The issue is fixed and is merged to master now. > > Best Regards, > Igor > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, The issue is fixed and is merged to master now. Best Regards, Igor On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 8:12 PM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Hello Igor, > > > I believe I could fix the ticket [1] by the end of the next week. > Should we still wait a bit for t his fix or postpone it to 2.10.1? WDYT? >

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello Igor, > I believe I could fix the ticket [1] by the end of the next week. Should we still wait a bit for t his fix or postpone it to 2.10.1? WDYT? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14204 On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 11:20, Max Timonin wrote: > > Hi, Maxim! > > The bug

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi, Maxim! The bug IGNITE-14206 [1] fixed. There are 2 commits to cherry-pick 1. https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/851f650ba03e0b6c081cfe23f411fd2bf6be0228 2. https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/93b74922bd04b164301d7bc5a2788b9693d4a8a4

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Anton, Your improvement is very important, for sure, but it's almost 2 months have passed since the initiation of the release branch. I think we should prepare the changes as fast as possible for now and initiate with the next one release. In general, it would be nice to have a release plan for

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13873 Is ready for review, is it possible to wait for it? On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:01 AM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Folks, > > > I'd like to cherry-pick to the release branch the following fixes: > > Fix security context for JDBC bulk-load

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I'd like to cherry-pick to the release branch the following fixes: Fix security context for JDBC bulk-load operations https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13472 Fixed an issue that caused a deadlock when user cache was created in parallel with TTL worker was in progress.

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, Igor, Thanks for sharing details. Let's wait for these fixes. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14206 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14204 On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 18:35, Igor Sapego wrote: > > Maxim, > > I believe I could fix the ticket [1] by the end of

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, I believe I could fix the ticket [1] by the end of the next week. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14204 Best Regards, Igor On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:30 PM Max Timonin wrote: > Hi! I've today found an issue [1], there is wrong handling of inlined POJO. > This bug

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi! I've today found an issue [1], there is wrong handling of inlined POJO. This bug appeared in 2.9.0 and makes it impossible to work with multi-column indexes created on old AI versions that contain inlined POJO keys in the middle. I'm working on the fix and asked Konstantin Orlov to review it.

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, Do we have any estimations of how long does it take to fix the issue [1] in C++ thin client? The bug must be fixed for sure, however, I tend to continue with the release (if fixing the bug require a few weeks) and prepare a batch of fixes for the 2.10.1. [1]

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello! There was a ticket filed about the new feature, transactions in C++ thin client, making this feature unusable if there's more than one connection endpoint: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14204 I don't think this is a genuine blocker for 2.10, since there is a workaround (use

Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

I fill the ticket with drop problem, plz take a look [1]   [1]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14205   >Ilya, > >Thanks! >I've added this step to the Release Process wiki page also [1]. > >[1]

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Ilya, Thanks! I've added this step to the Release Process wiki page also [1]. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-P1.2ImplementationandScopeFinalization On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 18:05, Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > > Hello! > > I have added

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello! I have added ignite-2.10 to Nightly build triggering. I hope we will have a 2.10 nightly tomorrow. Shame that I didn't do it earlier. https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/Releases_NightlyRelease_RunApacheIgniteNightlyRelease?branch=ignite-2.10=overview=builds Regards, -- Ilya

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, There is a possible issue with the performance for 2.9.1 vs 2.10. I'm trying to reproduce on a stress-testing environment. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/165224767/atomicPutRandomValueFullSync.jpg?api=v2 On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 20:46, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I'm going to cherry-pick these issues to the release branch, any objections? Checkpointer thread holds write lock too long https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14140 Incorrect initialize checkpoint-runner-cpu thread pool https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14139 On

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, Do we need any other critical issues from the master branch that need to be cherry-picked picked from the master branch? I've marked the latest select issues with patching version 2.10. - benchmarks completed (I'll do another one prior to preparing rc) - the release notes merged -

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi everyone, Below are two lists of items representing all the remaining (and completed) documentation tasks for the Ignite 2.10 release. The "*Improvements*" part includes PRs on reworked documentation. The "*Finished*" part includes PRs on newly added documentation. *Improvements:*

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, Thank you for being ready to help! As I mentioned before, I'm sharing the completed doc items today. Below is the list of tickets with the prepared PR's: *- Documentation: SQL tracing.* [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13981 [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8762

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Nikita, Thank you, I will be waiting for the review. > I'll give the precise estimate tomorrow as I'm still waiting for some info from the dev side. Let me know if you need any kind of help. On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 20:07, Никита Сафонов wrote: > > Hi Maxim, > > I can take a look! > > Moreover,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim, I can take a look! Moreover, I'm finishing the work on the remaining documentation tickets. I do believe that I'll be able to provide several PR's tomorrow and complete the rest in a couple of days. I'll give the precise estimate tomorrow as I'm still waiting for some info from the dev

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I've prepared the RELEASE_NOTES. Would anyone take a look at the PR [2] [1]? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14069 [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8748/files On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 22:13, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Folks, > > I've prepared first benchmarks

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I've prepared first benchmarks comparing 2.9.1 vs 2.10 [1]. Everything looks good at the first glance. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10#ApacheIgnite2.10-Benchmarks(2.9.1vs2.10) On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 18:32, Никита Сафонов wrote: > > Hi Maxim, > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim, terrific! Then, I'll continue with the tasks on the list. Thank you, Nikita чт, 28 янв. 2021 г. в 22:44, Maxim Muzafarov : > Hello Nikita, > > Thank you for sharing the state. > > I think we can move on to the next stages of the release. There are a > few important steps left to do:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello Nikita, Thank you for sharing the state. I think we can move on to the next stages of the release. There are a few important steps left to do: release_notes, stress testing. This may take some time, so we still have time to complete the rest of the documentation tasks. On Thu, 28 Jan 2021

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim et al, thank you! The rest of the documentation tasks for important features are also completed. Nevertheless, there are still some items (the ones on my list that do not have any doc tasks) that can be done for the 2.10 release. If you want them to be included, I will try to provide

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Nikita, Folks, All documentation tasks from the *[list #2]* [1] that you mentioned above have been processed and merged to the release branch. [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Apache-Ignite-Release-2-10-time-scope-manager-tp50037p51061.html On Mon, 25 Jan

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Shiva, I've cherry-picked the issue to 2.10 branch. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13912 Ilya, Thank you for preparing the patch. I've cherry-picked to 2.10 it too. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14039 On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 17:50, Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > > Hello!

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello! I have pushed the developer warning, javadoc warning and documentation update to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14039 about the dangers of WAL state change. Please cherry-pick it to 2.10 branch or mention me if it's OK for me to do this. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Denis, Thanks a lot! I'll update my PR's accordingly. Regards, Nikita сб, 23 янв. 2021 г. в 00:59, Denis Magda : > Nikita, thanks. I reviewed those and shared some suggestions. Please take > them into consideration. > > - > Denis > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Никита Сафонов >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Nikita, thanks. I reviewed those and shared some suggestions. Please take them into consideration. - Denis On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Никита Сафонов wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The following documentation tasks for the important features now have PATCH > AVAILABLE status: > >- Caches

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi everyone, The following documentation tasks for the important features now have PATCH AVAILABLE status: - Caches warming up strategy - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13385?src=confmacro - Update on JMX default configuration removal -

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi All, Can you please also include a critical ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13912 to 2.10 In terms of functionality it is a blocker. Still some debugging is going on related to this issue. Thanks, Shiva -- Sent from:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi everyone, I'm finishing my work on the documentation tasks for the following important features: - Caches warming up strategy - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13385?src=confmacro - Update on JMX default configuration removal -

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, This is the list of bugs which I've cherry-picked to the ignite-2.10 branch: Starvation in mgmt pool caused by MetadataTask execution https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13960 .NET: LINQ provider emits incorrect table alias for queries with JOIN and GROUP BY combined

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, No objections for .NET-related cherry-picks. Thank you! On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:52 PM Никита Сафонов wrote: > Hi Maxim et al, > > Thank you very much! > I do appreciate your help! > > Regards, > Nikita > > пн, 18 янв. 2021 г. в 16:16, Maxim Muzafarov : > > > Folks, > > > > I'd like

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim et al, Thank you very much! I do appreciate your help! Regards, Nikita пн, 18 янв. 2021 г. в 16:16, Maxim Muzafarov : > Folks, > > I'd like to cherry-pick these bugs to the ignite-2.10 branch. > Do you have any objections? > > > Starvation in mgmt pool caused by MetadataTask execution

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I'd like to cherry-pick these bugs to the ignite-2.10 branch. Do you have any objections? Starvation in mgmt pool caused by MetadataTask execution https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13960 .NET: LINQ provider emits incorrect table alias for queries with JOIN and GROUP BY

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Nikita, Thank you for sharing the progress. I will check all the PRs you reviewed and merge them if need. I will help you with the *[list #3]* issues (some of them already complete and merged to the 2.10 branch). On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 22:43, Никита Сафонов wrote: > > Hi Maxim et al, > > > I’d

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim et al, I’d like to share my interim status on Ignite 2.10 documentation work. - The following PR’s *[list #1]* are reviewed and, when the changes are accepted, ready to be merged, including 4 important features. - I’m pretty sure that I’ll collect and put together

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Maxim, Sure, I'll check these ones too. Thanks, Nikita вт, 12 янв. 2021 г. в 14:14, Maxim Muzafarov : > Nikita, > > I've also prepared the docs [1][2]. > Can you please check this small patch? > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13968 > [2]

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Nikita, I've also prepared the docs [1][2]. Can you please check this small patch? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13968 [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8642 On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 20:38, Никита Сафонов wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm finally back and ready to

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi everyone, I'm finally back and ready to continue the work, sorry for this delay. Maxim, thanks once again for preparing a list of important documentation issues. Regards, Nikita чт, 7 янв. 2021 г. в 13:47, Nikolay Izhikov : > Hello. > > I prepared docs [1] for the following tickets > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello. I prepared docs [1] for the following tickets Denis, can you, please, take a look? > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13488 - Add command to > control.(sh|bin) to get an arbitrary Metric > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13426 - Add command to >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Thanks, Maksim, Considering that most of the contributors will be on holidays through Jan 10th, it's highly unlikely that all documentation tickets will be ready by Jan 18th (the vote date). Anyway, Nikita confirmed that he'll be actively working on the tickets starting Jan 11th. As for me,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, The branch `ignite-2.10` for the release has been created. The list of issues related to 2.10 release [1]. If I excluded your issue you are working on from the release feel free to set the `fixVersion` back. [1] https://s.apache.org/qa6kk On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 11:43, Maxim Muzafarov

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, 1. I've prepared the list of unhandled important documentation issues for the 2.10 release, please check the wiki page link [1]. Note, that some of the important (from my point of view) documentation issues even not created. 2. Here is the list of resolved issues which seems to be

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi Denis, Maxim, I'd like to clarify that I'm pretty sure to complete the tasks below before the voting date: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13659 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13796 I'll start to work on them right after the long Russian NY holidays. But I'm not

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Igniters, I'm going to create the `ignite-2.10` release branch on Monday 28-th December. Please, keep this in mind when merging issues to the master branch. I'll also exclude all issues with `Open`, `In progress` states from the release. As for the `Patch Available` issues, we will discuss this

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Denis, Nikita Yes, the list of important documentation issues will be ready prior to the scope freeze date. I'll prepare it. I mean if we want to start working right now on some documentation task we can choose any important from those list of opened tasks. On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 19:55, Denis

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Maxim, Presently, there are 70 documentation tickets. Probably, these are all the tickets that we are moving from a release to a release. Could you help to prepare a list of 2.10-specific tickets (features, enhancements, required updates due to a change in the behavior)? As before, we can track

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hello Nikita, Thanks for your support. You can find the 2.10 related documentation issues on the release wiki page [1]. Currently, some of the important issues don't have the right priorities, so it's better to sort them first. As for the time estimates, we've previously agreed that

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Hi guys, I'd be more than happy to support the 2.10 release and contribute to the documentation. So could you please give me a scope of documentation tasks for 2.10 with the approximate time estimates? Regards, Nikita пн, 7 дек. 2020 г. в 16:23, Alexey Zinoviev : > Support it > > пн, 7 дек.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Support it пн, 7 дек. 2020 г. в 14:03, Maxim Muzafarov : > Folks, > > > I propose to shift a bit the release date since 2.9.1 has not released yet. > > > Scope Freeze: December 28, 2020 > Code Freeze: December 28, 2020 > Voting Date: January 25, 2021 > Release Date: February 1, 2021 > > WDYT? >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I propose to shift a bit the release date since 2.9.1 has not released yet. Scope Freeze: December 28, 2020 Code Freeze: December 28, 2020 Voting Date: January 25, 2021 Release Date: February 1, 2021 WDYT? On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 12:59, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Folks, > > I've

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I've marked all the valuable features of 2.10 release with an appropriate label. Please, let me know if I've missed anything. Here is the link to the JIRA: https://s.apache.org/1hyfu On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 12:28, Anton Vinogradov wrote: > > > - Distributed environment tests [2]

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

> - Distributed environment tests [2] (Nikolay Izhikov, Anton > Vinogradov, Ivan Daschinskiy) > Will all related issues be included in the 2.10? We're at the final preparations phase. Going to start the merge discussion soon. On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 4:48 PM Alexey Zinoviev wrote: > Yes, Model

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Yes, Model Export/Import for ML will be finished, now it's ready, but under testing on my side. ср, 11 нояб. 2020 г. в 16:08, Nikolay Izhikov : > I suggest to include CDC feature to the 2.10 scope. > > > 11 нояб. 2020 г., в 16:06, Maxim Muzafarov > написал(а): > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > Can

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

I suggest to include CDC feature to the 2.10 scope. > 11 нояб. 2020 г., в 16:06, Maxim Muzafarov написал(а): > > Igniters, > > > Can you clarify the issue statuses according to the Apache Ignite > Roadmap [1] and the 2.10 Apache Ignite Release? Here are some major > issues which are expected

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Igniters, Can you clarify the issue statuses according to the Apache Ignite Roadmap [1] and the 2.10 Apache Ignite Release? Here are some major issues which are expected to be included in 2.10 with the unknown status: - Distributed environment tests [2] (Nikolay Izhikov, Anton Vinogradov, Ivan

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Folks, I've created the release page on the Confluence. Feel free to mail in case of any errors. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.10 On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 17:56, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > Igniters, > > > Let's finalize the discussion [1] about the next

[DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

Igniters, Let's finalize the discussion [1] about the next upcoming major Apache Ignite 2.10 release. The major improvements related to the proposed release: - Improvements for partition clearing related parts - Add tracing of SQL queries. - CPP: Implement Cluster API - .NET: Thin client: