> And if we make GetTypeName virtual then any user can make extension of
BinaryBasicNameMapper and use it.
> I thought we want to avoid this.
Yes, let's avoid this. Making those methods virtual makes everything even
harder to understand,
especially the logic behind RegisterSameJavaType: we don't w
Hello, Pavel.
Thanks, for the feedback
> We can create a derived class so that existing _registerSameJavaType logic
> works.
For now, BinaryBasicNameMapper#GetTypeName is not virtual.
So we can’t override it.
And if we make GetTypeName virtual then any user can make extension of
BinaryBasicNa
Hello, Igniters.
Currently, BasicBinaryNameMapper[isSimpleName=false] assumes that type names
equals both in Java and .Net.
• Java type - ru.company.Model
• .Net type - ‘ru.company.Model`
However, .net naming conventions [1] differs from java [2]
So, if a user follows both conve
