I've started the vote.
Meanwhile, we have reached the user limit in the evaluation version.
Some people report that they can't register; we will request proper
open-source license as soon as the vote succeeds.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Pavel,
>
>
Pavel,
Makes sense to me. Let’s start the voting process then adding the link to this
discussion to the voting thread.
I would wait no less than 5 days giving a chance to everyone to share his/her
opinion.
—
Denis
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
>
I'd say that Github may be good for small changes, but when you trying to
review a big PR (like 100 files) it becomes almost unusable, because it
loads everything in one shot with no convenient navigation.
Also it happened to me that I lost some of my review comments on Github for
no obvious
Denis,
Contributors will have to start a review on branch or pull request manually
(a couple of clicks really), then attach an URL to the JIRA ticket.
Example: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4116
> are there any examples of Apache projects that used some 3rd party tool
for review
Why not / what is wrong with GitHub?
Code is there anyhow...
I've found this seems to be the way a lot of projects have gone.
It allows me to review the code without checkout
I can comment inline with a pr or code commit
I can fork a project to my own space and create a pr back to the main
Hi Pavel,
Very good idea! This will make review process transparent and more
community-friendly. So huge +1.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Andrey Gura wrote:
> +1
>
> Great tool.
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> avinogra...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
+1
Great tool.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn
> wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > We have set up Upsource code review tool at
> > http://reviews.ignite.apache.org/
>
Igniters,
We have set up Upsource code review tool at
http://reviews.ignite.apache.org/
I propose to evaluate it and see if it works for us.
* Why?
Current JIRA-based process is not very efficient. Anyone who have used a
review tool will probably agree:
- No need to switch branches locally