Alexey,
Yes, I've got almost the same performance (the difference is about 1%). I
think proxy creation has a relatively low cost compared to 2-4 network hops
required to invoke the service method.
More precisely:
First approach: create a service proxy on server-side each time, when a
service meth
Alexey,
Hello,
>
> I've benchmarked 1-operation approach vs 2-operations approach and
> published benchmark results on IEP page [1]. It looks like performance
> almost the same, so the single-operation approach should be implemented.
>
Do I understand correctly that you suggest to remote
the OP_SE
Hello,
I've benchmarked 1-operation approach vs 2-operations approach and
published benchmark results on IEP page [1]. It looks like performance
almost the same, so the single-operation approach should be implemented.
One more question: do we need some parameter on the server-side to disable
serv
Pavel,
I will try to benchmark by myself. Thank you.
ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 13:54, Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Alex,
>
> Thank you, the IEP looks complete now.
>
> Are you going to do the comparison benchmark of 1-operation vs 2-operation
> modes?
> I can do that too, just want to avoid duplicate work.
>
>
Alex,
Thank you, the IEP looks complete now.
Are you going to do the comparison benchmark of 1-operation vs 2-operation
modes?
I can do that too, just want to avoid duplicate work.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:17 PM Alex Plehanov
wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> Yes, looks like we can get this information fro
Pavel,
Yes, looks like we can get this information from ServiceDescriptor. I've
removed 'interface name' from requests in IEP. Thank you!
ср, 20 мая 2020 г. в 12:58, Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Alex,
>
> IEP looks good to me in general.
>
> One question: what is `Interface name` in the request?
> As I un
Alex,
IEP looks good to me in general.
One question: what is `Interface name` in the request?
As I understand, service name is enough to retrieve ServiceDescriptor,
and then we can get serviceClass from there.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:42 PM Alex Plehanov
wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> I've moved propos
Pavel,
I've moved proposals from this thread to the IEP [1] and described changes
to protocol, please have a look.
[1] :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-46%3A+Thin+Client+Service+Invocation
пн, 18 мая 2020 г. в 15:09, Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for starting th
Hi Alex,
Thanks for starting this thread.
I've created the IEP some time ago but then got distracted by other things.
My thoughts:
*1. Create service proxy on each invoke request*
Single client operation is a lot simpler to implement on both sides (client
and server), so I would prefer this way.
Hello Igniters,
I have plans to implement service invocation in thin clients. I've already
implemented a PoC for java thin client and want to discuss some details.
Also, Pavel Tupitsin has created IEP [1] and the ticket for .Net thin
client [2].
To invoke the service method by java thick client w
10 matches
Mail list logo
