Great！
在 16/1/1 02:35, Dmitriy Setrakyan 写道:
I tend to agree with Raul.
We have been anal-retentive to a fault with regard to LGPL, instead of
focusing on usability. Our users are already required to take a conscious
step to include LGPL modules into Ignite builds, so there is no implicit
“drag
blished Ignite Voting Process, please have a look before sending +1
> to vote ;)
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Voting+Process
>
I tend to agree with Raul.
We have been anal-retentive to a fault with regard to LGPL, instead of
focusing on usability. Our users are already required to take a conscious
step to include LGPL modules into Ignite builds, so there is no implicit
“drag-in”, as Raul mentioned.
I would vote for publi
Hi Brane,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> We'd be publishing modules that can't be used without the LGPL
> components. I'm not sure how that stands WRT our policies but I can't
> see how it would be a service to our users to actively nudge them
> towards using restrictive-
On 31.12.2015 09:58, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 30.12.2015 16:30, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>> Hi Anton,
>>
>> Why don't we publish artifacts for ignite-geospatial, ignite-hibernate and
>> ignite-schedule? The lgpl profile is not triggered in these instructions,
>> and these artifacts cease existing in M
On 30.12.2015 16:30, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> Why don't we publish artifacts for ignite-geospatial, ignite-hibernate and
> ignite-schedule? The lgpl profile is not triggered in these instructions,
> and these artifacts cease existing in Maven Central 1.2.0-incubating
> onwards.
>
> I k
, 2015 at 06:05PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> We've published Ignite Voting Process, please have a look before sending +1
> to vote ;)
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Voting+Process
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ipalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> We've published Ignite Voting Process, please have a look before sending +1
> to vote ;)
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Voting+Process
>
Igniters,
We've published Ignite Voting Process, please have a look before sending +1
to vote ;)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Voting+Process
