Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-18 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
and client will use timeout of 10 seconds. >> >> Stan >> >> From: Valentin Kulichenko >> Sent: 6 июля 2018 г. 23:17 >> To: dev@ignite.apache.org >> Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, >> TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts >> >> Stan, >

Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-09 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
onTimeout=20. > When these two nodes communicate, server will use timeouts of 20 seconds > and client will use timeout of 10 seconds. > > Stan > > From: Valentin Kulichenko > Sent: 6 июля 2018 г. 23:17 > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoveryS

RE: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-09 Thread Stanislav Lukyanov
seconds and client will use timeout of 10 seconds. Stan From: Valentin Kulichenko Sent: 6 июля 2018 г. 23:17 To: dev@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts Stan, Can you explain the semantics of both parameters? How do they behave when set

Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-06 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
ients instead of > > failureDetectionTimeout > > *What*: change code to use clientFailureDetectionTimeout on clients > > *When*: update code and readme.io docs in 2.7 > > > > Thanks, > > Stan > > > > From: Valentin Kulichenko > > Sent: 30 мая

RE: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-06 Thread Stanislav Lukyanov
Kulichenko Sent: 5 июля 2018 г. 18:16 To: dev@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts Stan, What is the purpose of clientFailureDetectionTimeout? Why can't we just always use failureDetectionTimeout? Is there any difference between these two

Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-05 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
IgniteConfiguration neither of > > which we’re considering for deprecation and removal in 3.0. > > > > Stan > > > > From: Valentin Kulichenko > > Sent: 29 мая 2018 г. 22:17 > > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > > Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, Tcp

RE: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-07-04 Thread Stanislav Lukyanov
: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts Stan, Looks like you suggest to only change the default. If so, it's OK. But let's not change the behavior of these timeouts for the case they are explicitly set in config. Thanks, Val On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Stanislav

Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-05-30 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
eConfiguration neither of > which we’re considering for deprecation and removal in 3.0. > > Stan > > From: Valentin Kulichenko > Sent: 29 мая 2018 г. 22:17 > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, > TcpCommunicationSpiti

RE: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-05-30 Thread Stanislav Lukyanov
in IgniteConfiguration neither of which we’re considering for deprecation and removal in 3.0. Stan From: Valentin Kulichenko Sent: 29 мая 2018 г. 22:17 To: dev@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts Stan, OK, I got confused a little :) I do agree

Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts

2018-05-29 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
g the changes. > > Thanks, > Stan > > From: Valentin Kulichenko > Sent: 29 мая 2018 г. 0:57 > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > Subject: Re: IgniteConfiguration, TcpDiscoverySpi, > TcpCommunicationSpitimeouts > > Hi Stan, > > I'm 100% for this activity, however I