Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Know I see what you mean. Those two tabs ("Configuration without persistence" and "Configuration with persistence") don't just switch code snippet, they show different content + code snippets depending on if you set up Ignite persistence or not. That technique was used for the K8 instructions inten

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

I know that if the content of codeblock(tabs) is a code snippet, it has a background color. If it's a markdown text, it's not. In other words, the background color is the background color of the code snippet, not the background color of codeblock. 在 2020/10/6 上午7:31, Denis Magda 写道: Hey, thank

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hey, thanks for keep checking the content and behavior of the new docs. This helps a lot! https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm > This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only > descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the > original one.

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Igniters, the new docs are released and merged to the ignite master repository. Below are some further tasks. Use the "new-docs" label to report any issues related to the new docs. Compare with the list below to double-check if an issue is already reported: - Issues with the left-navigation men

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hi Denis, There are several suggestions for improvement: 1.The right most scroll bar should only affect the body part of the document, but now scrolling the right scroll bar, the left menu and the right TOC are affected, so the user experience is not good; 2.CodeBlock(tabs) components should

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/setup-dotnet this page is 404 在 2020/10/3 上午11:43, Denis Magda 写道: Hi, Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes as well as complete rewrites of p

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hi Denis, Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the original one. In addition, with regard to Ku

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hi, Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes as well as complete rewrites of pages. Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about legacy or rarely used APIs.

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hi Denis, I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again. I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint. htt

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Thanks Pavel! Merged. Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9 enhancements. On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the feature branch into the master.* Refrain from doi

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331 On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > Denis, > > Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job! > I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:1

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Denis, Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job! I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:15 AM Denis Magda wrote: > You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such as > the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published to

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

You might need to empty the browser cache to see the latest changes such as the "C# and .NET Specific" section that was published today. There is some CSS issue that doesn't invalidate browsing caches. It will be fixed soon. - Denis On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Denis Magda wrote: > Pavel, >

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Pavel, I ported all the .NET-specific pages from readme.io with minor changes. The docs are under the "C# and .NET Specific" section down the navigation tree: https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest The thin-client related docs are under the "Thin Clients" sections. It all makes things look a bit c

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Pavel, Alright, I'll do the porting of those pages and you'll take care of IGNITE-13331 . Let's split the job. Nikolay, I'll review your contribution early next week. Thanks, folks, for the cooperation. - Denis On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:19

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hello, Igniters. I’ve prepared two PR for new docs: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8279 - JOBS system view description. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8280 - KILL commands description. Please, review. > 25 сент. 2020 г., в 09:19, Pavel Tupitsyn написал(а): > >> Do you want me

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

> Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself? I'm ok either way, any help with this will be greatly appreciated :) > Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those? Existing integrations are for legacy technologies. We are going to remove them in 3.0 [1] and, hop

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Pavel, thanks for preparing the list of the missing pages. Do you want me to port those pages or are you going to do it yourself? Btw, what's wrong with the 3rd-party integrations? Are you saying the .NET community no longer uses those? - Denis On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:45 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wr

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Denis, > @Pavel Tupitsyn ... Are you going to document the features added in 2.9 Yes, I have this on my plate, but the release was postponed so I postponed the task as well. > is there is anything else you planned to move from readme.io? A

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hi! As we introduce CMake build system for Ignite C++ for Linux and Mac OS X and this improvement is in ignite 2.9, we should document it. (CMake for windows is not ready yet and will be in 2.10) I created ticket for it and assigned it to me. Patch will be available soon. [1] - https://issues.apac

Re: New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Hello, Denis. > • @Nikolay Izhikov, is there any chance you can document the new > management commands the next week? Use me as a reviewer. Yes. > 18 сент. 2020 г., в 02:24, Denis Magda написал(а): > > Folks, > > While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs pr

New Ignite Docs: Status and Incomplete Items

Folks, While Artem is unavailable, Mauricio and I keep pushing the new docs project to the finish line: https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/preface Overall, we hope to copy the last bits from the readme.io to the new engine, document the release and contribution process, and settle down with th