Re: New method for MemoryMetrics: segment fill variance

Sounds good! ⁣D.​ On Jul 19, 2017, 1:54 PM, at 1:54 PM, Ivan Rakov wrote: >Dmitriy, > >I agree, hashFunctionScore is more comprehensible. >I'd correct it to "pageHashFunctionScore" to make it clear that it's >about function that distributes pages, not about hashCode() of

Re: New method for MemoryMetrics: segment fill variance

Dmitriy, I agree, hashFunctionScore is more comprehensible. I'd correct it to "pageHashFunctionScore" to make it clear that it's about function that distributes pages, not about hashCode() of user-provided keys. -- Best Regards, Ivan Rakov On 18.07.2017 19:34, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:

Re: New method for MemoryMetrics: segment fill variance

Ivan, How about renaming it to hashFunctionScore? This will be more digestable to users. "segmentFillVariance" sounds too scientific even to me. D. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Ivan Rakov wrote: > Hello Igniters, > > I want to propose one more method for memory