Re: Re[2]: Apache Ignite 2.13 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2022-03-25 Thread Nikita Amelchev
Igniters, I have cut the release branch: 'ignite-2.13'. Please, cherry-pick new issues if needed. The 2.13 scope is freezed. Unresolved not-blocking issues will be moved on the code freeze stage. The planning release date was updated [1]: Scope Freeze: March 25, 2022 Code Freeze: April 8, 2022 V

Re: Re[2]: Apache Ignite 2.13 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2022-03-10 Thread Nikita Amelchev
Hello, Igniters. I have created the 2.13 release page. [1] The new SQL Calcite engine is expected to merge in the coming week. [2] I suggest cutting the 2.13 branch after the merge. I've updated the planned release dates on the release page. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE

Re: Re[2]: Apache Ignite 2.13 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2022-02-10 Thread Nikita Amelchev
Guys, +1 to await merge of the Calcite SQL engine before code-freeze phase and release branch cutting. Other features and fixes can be awaited too, it's discussable. But the 2.12 branch was cut on October 15, 2021. There are many fixes and features that were merged into the master during this per

Re: Re[2]: Apache Ignite 2.13 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2022-02-10 Thread Anton Vinogradov
> I «vote» for more frequent releases. +1 Hotfixes, eg. 2.12.1, should be released asap (no need to wait for 2.13). And it's ok to release 2.13 without fixes planned for 2.12.1 since not all users are affected but some wait for features like "Consistency check & repair". On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at

Re[2]: Apache Ignite 2.13 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2022-02-10 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Maxim, i think that more frequent releases are useful. Ready to release branch means that it passed all known tests and also have an appropriate votes. More code changes creates more difficulties in final tests and sometimes migration. No need to switch between neighbor minor versions for user i