Re: cache metadata progapagation

2017-02-21 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Thanks, Val. I think it is worthwhile to change the ticket description with full context at this point. Also, the title of the ticket should not have CacheStore, but CacheConfiguration. Can you do it? On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: cache metadata progapagation

2017-02-21 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Dmitry, I believe you're talking about this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1903 I just added a comment there with some thoughts about how we can improve this. -Val On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dmitriy, > > What

Re: cache metadata progapagation

2017-02-20 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Dmitriy, What do you mean by deploying cache metadata? The node filter itself must be deserialized on each node because we need to evaluate it. As for the CacheConfiguration, we do not need to deserialize the configuration on every node, this will be a good change for Ignite 2.0. 2017-02-16

cache metadata progapagation

2017-02-16 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Igniters, I believe that we are not propagating cache metadata correctly, but I want to confirm it with the community first. Currently, it is possible in Ignite to split the cluster into logical groups, and deploy caches only on certain nodes using NodeFilters. For example, CacheA will reside