GitHub user ruskim opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/468
IGNITE-2555 fix
Added offheap usage (used/free/committed) to local node reports.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ruskim/ignite
GitHub user Dmitriyff opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/465
IGNITE-2369 added ability to auto close popup after broswer navigation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Dmitriyff/ignite
Hi All,
I'm Konstantin Margorin from Anturis.
I would like to contribute my effort on Apache Ignite project and
appreciate if I could join with you.
Looking forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Konstantin
Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-2599:
--
Summary: Unsaved changes doesn't appear on Clone cache\igfs\model
Key: IGNITE-2599
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2599
Project: Ignite
Dmitriyff created IGNITE-2597:
-
Summary: rework transport layer to websocket
Key: IGNITE-2597
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2597
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2598:
---
Summary: Enum arguments in SQL queries are not considered with
BinaryMarshaller
Key: IGNITE-2598
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2598
Project: Ignite
GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/467
IGNITE-2523
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ilantukh/ignite ignite-2523
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes
GitHub user isapego opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/466
IGNITE-: Implemented Date and Timestamp classes.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/isapego/ignite ignite-
Alternatively
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2600:
---
Summary: .NET: Do not serialize object if AtomicReference CAS
succeeded.
Key: IGNITE-2600
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2600
Project:
Konstantin, sorry I confused the name.
Should you have any further questions please feel free to ask.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Welcome to the Ignite community!
>
> You should get familiar with Ignite development process
Hi Vladimir.
I had searched through open tickets for newbies. And looks like the only
open unassigned ticked is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2049
Is this ticket right point to start?
Best regards,
Konstantin
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
Konstantin,
This ticket is more about build process. You can also look at the following
ones:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1783
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2555
Vladimir.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Konstantin Margorin
wrote:
> Hi
Vladimir, thank you.
I could handle this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2555
Konstantin
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Konstantin,
>
> This ticket is more about build process. You can also look at the following
> ones:
>
Igniters,
I want to bring community attention to the ticket [1] once again since it
raises a lot of confusion among Ignite users [2] and I would like this to
be addressed in 1.6.
The alternatives for the case when entry processor is used in CLOCK mode
are:
* Print a warning, but still allow to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/455
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/417
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
After a second thought, I think the warning should be printed anyways when
CLOCK versioning mode is used because it does not guarantee happens-before
relationship when cache operations are invoked on different nodes (see an
example in pseudo-code below). Essentially, when cache operations are
Hi Carlos,
Welcome to the Ignite community!
You should get familiar with Ignite development process described here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Development+Process
Instructions on how to contribute can be found here:
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2602:
--
Summary: Queries: offset does not work with negative or MAX_VALUE
limit
Key: IGNITE-2602
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2602
Project: Ignite
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2603:
---
Summary: OSGi support for objects passed through CacheConfiguration
Key: IGNITE-2603
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2603
Project: Ignite
Denis Magda created IGNITE-2604:
---
Summary: CacheContinuousQueryBatchAck is sent to nodes that
doesn't hold cache data
Key: IGNITE-2604
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2604
Project:
Hi Konstantin, welcome!
Added you to the contributors list in JIRA. So for now you're able to
assign tickets by yourself.
I've seen your pull-request. However please get to know the details of
pull-request based contribution
Suminda Dharmasena created IGNITE-2606:
--
Summary: Drop in Replacement for Apache YARN
Key: IGNITE-2606
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2606
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Suminda Dharmasena created IGNITE-2607:
--
Summary: Drop in Replacement for ZooKeeper
Key: IGNITE-2607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2607
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Konstantin, could you please add one more metric - node up time.
I think this metric may be added to the first row:
^-- Node [id=41b12e0f, name=null]
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Hi Konstantin, welcome!
>
> Added you to the contributors list in
Sure, I'll do that.
Just a small question: is everything ok with my pull request, or I missed
something in documentation?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Pavel Konstantinov <
pkonstanti...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Konstantin, could you please add one more metric - node up time.
> I think this
Vasiliy Sisko created IGNITE-2609:
-
Summary: Add validation on new name of clon object
Key: IGNITE-2609
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2609
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-2608:
--
Summary: Add key fields into valu fields while importing model
from DB in corner case
Key: IGNITE-2608
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2608
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2610:
---
Summary: Excessive memory usage in GridCacheTtlManager.
Key: IGNITE-2610
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2610
Project: Ignite
Issue
I don’t think there is anything else that can be done in addition to
printing our a warning and fixing documentation. Looks like an easy fix, I
marked it with “newbie”, so some of the new community members could pick it
up.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Alexey Goncharuk
I created account "ruskim" in jira.
Should I ask someone to assign ticket IGNITE-2555 to me, or I could create
pull request as is?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Konstantin Margorin
wrote:
> Vladimir, thank you.
>
> I could handle this one:
>
31 matches
Mail list logo