Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4880:
--
Summary: .NET: Rename Impl types
Key: IGNITE-4880
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4880
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
GitHub user endian675 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1692
Ignite-4878
Replace conns collection with ConcurrentLinkedDeque to avoid possible
concurrent modification exception
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
GitHub user kdudkov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1693
Ignite 4876
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4876
Alternatively you can review and apply these
Thank you for your reply. I will be watching this thread.
However, GSOC applications are due Monday. So, some suggestions for what to
write on the proposal would be great, if pull request will be later than
Monday.
--
View this message in context:
Fantastic guidance, I'll register on IMC - thanks Denis.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:22 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Dani, excellent job!
>
> *Prachi*, could you publish the article to DZone and update Ignite’s
> blogging page? Since this will be a series of posts don’t add DZone
Alper - we are very close to "pull request" our preliminary work into ignite
2.0 (finger crossed it will make it into it). Once we have it available in
the main ignite 2.0 branch there will be plenty of interesting tasks to
tackle. Stay tuned on this thread!
--
View this message in context:
Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-4881:
Summary: REPLICATED cache size is wrong after node left topology.
Key: IGNITE-4881
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4881
Project: Ignite
Hello, Igniters! I have one more question to you. Will appreciate any help.
Consider cache with near , dht configured not null.
When we start commit transaction , in method
*org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal#enlistWriteEntry*
we put newly created entry
Guys,
I stumbled across this ticket [1] and it seems to me that the whole
approach of identity resolvers is error-prone. If a key contains some data
that does not participate in equals() calculation, these fields may be as
well moved to the value object. Even with binary objects, key mutation
Github user isapego closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1665
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Rishi,
I will review in next couple of days.
-Val
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Rishi Yagnik wrote:
> Hi Val,
>
> Committed changes on IGNITE-2786, would like you to review the
> changes.Would you please review it ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:11 PM,
Hello Aleksey,
No, the enlisted entry won't be visible for other transactions. Dirty reads
are not allowed in Ignite.
Kind regards,
Alex
29 марта 2017 г. 7:36 PM пользователь "ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV" <
alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> написал:
Hello, Igniters! I have one more question to you. Will
I’m not sure we can simply discontinue the identity resolvers that were
originally created for DML. *Vovan*, *Alex Paschenko*, please chime in and
provide your thoughts. Don’t want us to make such decisions in haste.
Alex G., in any case, assuming that the resolvers are still in 2.0 is there
Alex,
How do you suggest to replace the CacheKey class? It's internal for
Hibernate and I'm not sure it's possible.
-Val
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> I’m not sure we can simply discontinue the identity resolvers that were
> originally created for
Guys, nothing is impossible if you know a bit about reflection in Java :)
We had a look at the CacheKey class and it is easily replaceable.
Sergi
2017-03-29 21:49 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
>
Solution implemented in core-level and works with binary-marshaller.
If you about the cache queries - it works with compressed data.
2017-03-29 21:42 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
>
> > Hello
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Hibernate key" is the CacheKey class I was referring to. It's provided by
> Hibernate, not by user and not by us. So I'm not sure it's possible to
> replace it.
>
If it is impossible to replace or
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Hello Vyacheslav, thanks for your efforts.
>
> Is there any special support for SQL? In the original discussion [1]
> around this task the folks expressed several concerns about compression
> usefulness w/o the ability to
"Hibernate key" is the CacheKey class I was referring to. It's provided by
Hibernate, not by user and not by us. So I'm not sure it's possible to
replace it.
-Val
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Alexey,
>
> Can you explain what is the
It looks like a good idea to drop identity resolvers for now and require
stable binary representation for keys in 2.0. Later if it will be really
needed we will be able to add them back.
Sergi
2017-03-29 19:08 GMT+03:00 Alexey Goncharuk :
> Guys,
>
> I stumbled
Hello Vyacheslav, thanks for your efforts.
Is there any special support for SQL? In the original discussion [1] around
this task the folks expressed several concerns about compression usefulness w/o
the ability to execute SQL queries over compressed data. In general it makes
sense to run the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur
wrote:
> Solution implemented in core-level and works with binary-marshaller.
>
> If you about the cache queries - it works with compressed data.
>
Vyacheslav, can you please explain how the cache queries work with the
Sorry, I get lost in tickets.
Yes, IGNITE-2313 has to be completed in 2.0 if we want to makes this change.
—
Denis
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Дмитрий Рябов wrote:
>
> Savepoints marked for 2.1, exceptions for 2.0. Do you want me to make
> exceptions first?
>
>
Queries works with BinaryObjectImpl.
1. In the full compression mode - compressed bytes sequence - will be
decompressed at initialization of BinaryObjectImpl.
2. With annotated fields compression - value of compressed fields will be
decompress at deserializing on demand, for example when calls
Thanks, Denis! I agree that an anchor would make sense. Also really like the
idea to add the social icons to make sharing fast and easy.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Making-News-page-more-visible-tp15763p15927.html
Sent from the Apache
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1617
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Maxim, Andrey G., Igniters,
What if go further and remove CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum from the public
API at all? I see no sense to keep it for the only one option left - PRIMARY.
Any objections?
—
Denis
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Kozlov Maxim wrote:
>
> Hi
Val, Igniters,
I still believe the thin client has a right for living. It’s ideal for use
cases when someone attempts to connect to Ignite from a tool or some sort of
interface and query the data or update it in non transactional fashion. A
TCP/IP address as a connection string to the cluster
> At which point does this step take place? Do we deserialize right when we
> receive the object over the wire?
When put it in cache, after marshalling.
Covered by properly configured existing tests. [1][2][3]
> Forgive me if I don't know the internals, but does this happen when SQL
> queries
I'm not saying there is no alternative solution. But let's implement it and
prove that it works first, and remove resolvers only after that.
-Val
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Sergi Vladykin
wrote:
> Guys, nothing is impossible if you know a bit about reflection
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur
wrote:
> Queries works with BinaryObjectImpl.
>
> 1. In the full compression mode - compressed bytes sequence - will be
> decompressed at initialization of BinaryObjectImpl.
>
At which point does this step take place? Do
Andrew Mashenkov created IGNITE-4879:
Summary: System pool starvation while partition evicting.
Key: IGNITE-4879
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4879
Project: Ignite
Github user endian675 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1689
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Prachi, as one of the site maintainers, would you mind contributing this?
Denis
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017, Tom Diederich
wrote:
> Thanks, Denis! I agree that an anchor would make sense. Also really like
> the
> idea to add the social icons to make sharing fast
Sergi, Vovan,
As SQL and binary marshaller maintainers could you plan to review the
contribution?
—
Denis
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur wrote:
>
>> At which point does this step take place? Do we deserialize right when we
>> receive the object over
Hello everybody!
Nikolay, the properties for mesos role and JUnit test were added.
Review please the pull request - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1662
Vadim Opolski
2017-03-24 18:41 GMT+03:00 Nikolai Tikhonov :
> Great! Looking forward to the contribution.
>
> On
Hello everyone.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3592 is ready for review.
ci.tests [1] look good.
Upsource review was created.[2]
Solution provides 2 way to use compression.
1. Full compression mode.
Switches in the IgniteConfiguration#fullCompressionMode field.
Full compression
GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1690
Ignite 1.8.5
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-1.8.5
Alternatively you can review and apply
Finish savepoints or flag for atomic operations?
Not sure about savepoints. Exceptions - yes.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2313 isn't it?
2017-03-29 2:12 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda :
> If we want to make the exception based approach the default one then the
> task
Hi! No, i dont have ticket for this.
In the ticket i have implemented methods that change transaction status to
STOP, thus letting it to commit transaction in another thread. In another
thread you r going to restart transaction in order to commit it.
The mechanism behind it is obvious : we change
GitHub user endian675 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1689
IGNITE-4847
ignite-4847 log4j2 2.8.1 upgrade
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/endian675/ignite ignite-4847-1
Alternatively
Thank you for your contribution! Please, don't forget to move ticket in
"path available" state.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Вадим Опольский
wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Nikolay, the properties for mesos role and JUnit test were added.
>
> Review please the pull
GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1691
Ignite 4284 1.8.5
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4284-1.8.5
Alternatively you can review
Hi all !
In GridNearTxLocal while preparing phase in optimistic mode :
*org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal#prepareNearTxLocal*
we check serializable() and create
GridNearOptimisticSerializableTxPrepareFuture
What is the point of serializable future ?
--
Val,
>> Does anyone have an idea why client mode in Visor affects behavior? I
thought we already forced client mode there, no?
Visor CMD was NOT reworked to client mode.
So Visor CMD starts server node in daemon mode.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
Savepoints marked for 2.1, exceptions for 2.0. Do you want me to make
exceptions first?
2017-03-29 11:24 GMT+03:00 Дмитрий Рябов :
> Finish savepoints or flag for atomic operations?
> Not sure about savepoints. Exceptions - yes. https://issues.apache.
>
Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-4876:
Summary: Tests: node stop should wait for cluster to see actual
topology version
Key: IGNITE-4876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4876
Vyacheslav Daradur created IGNITE-4877:
--
Summary: Add test covers get(key, type) in direct way (via
SpringCache)
Key: IGNITE-4877
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4877
Project:
Michael Griggs created IGNITE-4878:
--
Summary: IgniteH2Indexing can throw
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
Key: IGNITE-4878
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4878
Project:
49 matches
Mail list logo