Hello Evgeniy,
What is PureJavaCrc32 used for in Ignite? Is it on a critical path
somewhere?
--
Denis
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:08 PM Евгений Станиловский
wrote:
> Hi, igniters, i wrote a simple bench, looks like PureJavaCrc32 has
> performance problems in compatible with zip.CRC32.
>
>
Pavel, thanks a lot!
--
Denis
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:35 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> I've updated NuGet package description and docs:
>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/af03d8413defc992501ffc7246427df6a46c6840
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:06 PM Pavel Tupitsyn
> wrote:
Thanks Vladimir, looks like l have to implement same rules in the LINQ
provider, will do this as part of mentioned ticket.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:25 PM Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> You are right, we have some non-obvious rules here, mainly legacy. Please
> see how schema name is
Hello, Denis.
AFAIK CRC calculated:
1. For each page that are readed or written to the persistence store [1].
2. For each read or write of WAL record [2].
[1]
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4504
---
I think it would break backward compatibility, as Nikolay mentioned above
we would take exception here:
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/file/FilePageStore.java#L372
thats why i question for
Hi, igniters, i wrote a simple bench, looks like PureJavaCrc32 has performance
problems in compatible with zip.CRC32.
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
BenchmarkCRC.Crc32 avgt 5 1088914.540 ± 368851.822 ns/op
BenchmarkCRC.pureJavaCrc32 avgt 5 6619408.049 ± 3746712.210 ns/op
thoughts?
Evgeniy,
Could you share benchmark code? And please share what version of JVM
you have used.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:44 PM Zhenya wrote:
> I think it would break backward compatibility, as Nikolay mentioned above
> we would take exception here:
>
> [1]
>
>
Hi Igniters,
For some time MTCGA bot was not up and running due to a bug. Now the bug is
fixed and the bot continues to detect failures.
Could you please share your vision why tests were failed.
I can suppose that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9050 has
affected
Vladimir,
Could you step in? How should we update our docs and what are the steps to
add Arrays support to the project? I thought this worked all the times.
--
Denis
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:55 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Thanks for a comments.
>
> Should we update documentation and remove
Hi, a number of test failures I've commented in the separate thread.
Only one concern I have here: it is ZooKeeper (Discovery) 2 timeouts. I
don't remember if timeouts occurred so often.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
пн, 13 авг. 2018 г. в 19:53, :
> Hi Ignite Developer,
>
> I am MTCGA.Bot, and
Hi Evgeniy,
would you like to submit a patch with CRC32 implementation change?
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
пн, 13 авг. 2018 г. в 22:08, Евгений Станиловский
:
> Hi, igniters, i wrote a simple bench, looks like PureJavaCrc32 has
> performance problems in compatible with zip.CRC32.
>
> Benchmark
Dmitriy Govorukhin created IGNITE-9260:
--
Summary: StandaloneWalRecordsIterator broken on
WalSegmentTailReachedException not in work dir
Key: IGNITE-9260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9260
GitHub user DmitriyGovorukhin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4533
IGNITE-9260 fix broken validation of tail reached in standalone WAL iterator
â¦terator
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Govorukhin
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Hi Ignite Developer,
I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I
hope you can help.
*New test failure in master
CacheLockReleaseNodeLeaveTest.testLockTopologyChange
Aleksey Zinoviev created IGNITE-9261:
Summary: [ML] Add ANN algorithm based on ACD concept
Key: IGNITE-9261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9261
Project: Ignite
Issue
GitHub user zaleslaw opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4534
IGNITE-9261: Added ANN algorithm and fixed bug IGNITE-9239
- Added ANN algorithm
- fixed bug in KMeans
- renamed LabeledDataset to the LabeledVectorSet
- added example
- added test
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4523
---
GitHub user shroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4523
IGNITE-9252: Update RocketMQ dependencies to 4.3.0.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shroman/ignite IGNITE-9252
Alternatively
Thanks.
I've created a ticket [1] for this issue.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9241
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:23 PM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> В Чт, 09/08/2018 в 12:51 +0300, Pavel Kovalenko пишет:
> > Andrey,
> >
> > Huge +1 for that.
> > "Force server mode"
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4420
---
ARomantsov created IGNITE-9255:
--
Summary: -DIGNITE_QUIET=false not work in windows, -v work ok
Key: IGNITE-9255
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9255
Project: Ignite
Issue
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-9256:
---
Summary: SQL: make sure that fetched results are cleared from
iterator when last element is fetched
Key: IGNITE-9256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9256
Github user tledkov-gridgain closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4514
---
Hello Igniters!
So we have merged the patch. If there are further steps with CLHM, feel
free to contribute.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
2018-08-10 17:50 GMT+03:00 Andrey Gura :
> Stas,
>
> SkipList implementation offers O(log n) for get/put/contains
> operations while CLHM - O(1). So it is
Igniters,
For .NET LINQ provider[1] I need to be able to infer SQL schema name from
CacheConfiguration.
Looks like value from CacheConfiguration gets uppercased when not quoted.
So my logic for now is:
* if config.SqlSchema == null, use config.name
* otherwise, if config.SqlSchema does not
Dmitry Karachentsev created IGNITE-9257:
---
Summary: LOCAL cache doesn't evict entries from heap
Key: IGNITE-9257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9257
Project: Ignite
Hi Pavel,
You are right, we have some non-obvious rules here, mainly legacy. Please
see how schema name is constructed here:
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.QueryUtils#normalizeSchemaName
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:55 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> For .NET LINQ
GitHub user alamar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4529
IGNITE-9054 Avoid using OptimizedMarshaller with ScanQuery initial.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite
GitHub user dmekhanikov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4530
IGNITE-5795 Ensure binary metadata registration on start of cache with
QueryEntity.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user stuartmacd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4531
IGNITE-9180 IgniteSparkSession Should Copy State on cloneSession()
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/stuartmacd/ignite
Hi Denis,
I've updated NuGet package description and docs:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/af03d8413defc992501ffc7246427df6a46c6840
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:06 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I'm on vacation with limited internet access.
> I think I
Github user DmitriyGovorukhin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4513
---
Roman Shtykh created IGNITE-9253:
Summary: Rename activation/deactivation commands for REST API
Key: IGNITE-9253
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9253
Project: Ignite
Issue
GitHub user slukyano opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4524
Ignite 2.4.8 p1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-2.4.8-p1
Alternatively you can review and
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-9254:
---
Summary: In SQL EXPLAIN, display whether query were broadcast or
sent to affinity node
Key: IGNITE-9254
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9254
GitHub user shroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4525
IGNITE-9253: Rename activation/deactivation commands for REST API.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shroman/ignite IGNITE-9253
GitHub user slukyano opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4526
Ignite 2.4.6.b3
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-2.4.6.b3
Alternatively you can review and
GitHub user isapego opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4527
IGNITE-9248: C++ compilation with Clang is supported now
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-9248
GitHub user eranbetzalel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4532
BinaryTypeStorage will only be initialized with a CONNECTED state socket
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/exposebox/ignite
Thanks for a comments.
Should we update documentation and remove ARRAY support?
Vladimir, Denis, can you comment on this?
В Пн, 13/08/2018 в 17:29 +0300, Vyacheslav Daradur пишет:
> Hi, Nick!
>
> ASAIK java.sql.Array hasn't been implemented in binary infrastructure yet.
>
> You should
Hello, Igniters.
Does Ignite support java.sql.Array?
Can someone from SQL experts clarify this case?
My question relates to the specific ticket that comes from our user [1], [2]
Ignite documentaion says that we support sql ARRAY data type [3].
1. I'm able to create table with ARRAY column.
GitHub user imurchenko opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4528
IGNITE-9010: Move web-console build to dedicated root directory
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite
Dmitry Karachentsev created IGNITE-9259:
---
Summary: Wrong log message in IgniteKernal#ackMemoryConfiguration
Key: IGNITE-9259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9259
Project:
Eran Betzalel created IGNITE-9258:
-
Summary: NodeJS - Fail to handle more than one client in the same
app
Key: IGNITE-9258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9258
Project: Ignite
Andrey,
It was discussed already here [1].
And the fix is almost merged.
[1]
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-forceServerMode-on-clients-and-unclear-contract-of-isClient-isClientMode-methods-td31152.html
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andrey Mashenkov
wrote:
Hi Nikolay
I was not able to use array type in sqlline [1] in 2.6
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9230
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Nikolay Izhikov
wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> Does Ignite support java.sql.Array?
> Can someone from SQL experts clarify this case?
>
> My
Hi, Nick!
ASAIK java.sql.Array hasn't been implemented in binary infrastructure yet.
You should implement it first, like in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4158
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:22 PM Sergey Kozlov wrote:
>
> Hi Nikolay
>
> I was not able to use array type in sqlline [1]
Hi Ignite Developer,
I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I
hope you can help.
*New test failure in master CachePartitionedTest.TestWithExpiryPolicy
Hi Ignite Developer,
I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I
hope you can help.
*New test failure in master CacheAbstractTest.TestWithExpiryPolicy
Hi Ignite Developer,
I am MTCGA.Bot, and I've detected some issue on TeamCity to be addressed. I
hope you can help.
*New Critical Failure in master ZooKeeper (Discovery) 2
51 matches
Mail list logo
