[GitHub] ignite pull request #5493: IGNITE-10399 Fix inspection error.

2018-11-24 Thread antonovsergey93
GitHub user antonovsergey93 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5493 IGNITE-10399 Fix inspection error. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-10399 Alternatively

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-10399) Fix inspection failures

2018-11-24 Thread Sergey Antonov (JIRA)
Sergey Antonov created IGNITE-10399: --- Summary: Fix inspection failures Key: IGNITE-10399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10399 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

[GitHub] ignite pull request #5494: Ignite-2.5.1-p152

2018-11-24 Thread dgovorukhin
GitHub user dgovorukhin opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5494 Ignite-2.5.1-p152 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-2.5.1-p152 Alternatively you can review

Re: Suggestion to improve deadlock detection

2018-11-24 Thread Павлухин Иван
Hi Vladimir, Regarding fault tolerance. It seems that it is not a problem for edge-chasing approaches. A found deadlock is identified by a message returned to a detection initiator with initiator's identifier. If there is no deadlock then such message will not come. If some node containing a

[GitHub] asfgit closed pull request #82: Ignite 9542 remove unused code

2018-11-24 Thread GitBox
asfgit closed pull request #82: Ignite 9542 remove unused code URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot/pull/82 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] ignite pull request #5496: IGNITE-9980 Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_veri...

2018-11-24 Thread vldpyatkov
GitHub user vldpyatkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5496 IGNITE-9980 Modify ./control.sh --cache idle_verify --dump print to d… …iff mode (user persistant only/user not-persistent only/system only) cache You can merge this pull request into a

[GitHub] ignite pull request #5495: IGNITE-9275: WIP communication spi socket creatio...

2018-11-24 Thread Mmuzaf
GitHub user Mmuzaf opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5495 IGNITE-9275: WIP communication spi socket creation You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Mmuzaf/ignite ignite-9275 Alternatively you

[GitHub] asfgit closed pull request #83: Ignite 9542 unit test for blockers detection

2018-11-24 Thread GitBox
asfgit closed pull request #83: Ignite 9542 unit test for blockers detection URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot/pull/83 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] dspavlov opened a new pull request #83: Ignite 9542 unit test for blockers detection

2018-11-24 Thread GitBox
dspavlov opened a new pull request #83: Ignite 9542 unit test for blockers detection URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot/pull/83 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: Thin clients all in one

2018-11-24 Thread Stepan Pilschikov
Dmitry, Great, checked, now all things woks well Hope that Igor made review for this PR But what about Maps? Looks like different ticket? or it can be done in same ticket scope? пт, 23 нояб. 2018 г. в 23:58, Dmitry Melnichuk < dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>: > Stepan, > > Sorry, I forgot to

[GitHub] dspavlov opened a new pull request #84: IGNITE-9542 new invocation history implementation

2018-11-24 Thread GitBox
dspavlov opened a new pull request #84: IGNITE-9542 new invocation history implementation URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-teamcity-bot/pull/84 to provide separated base/current branch history for PR page This is an

Re: Thin clients all in one

2018-11-24 Thread Dmitry Melnichuk
Stepan, AFAIK Map type did always behave correctly on client side, as it does now. This is a corresponding piece of my test suite: ``` def test_put_get_map(client): cache = client.get_or_create_cache('test_map_cache') cache.put( 'test_map', (