Val,
So the plan is:
- Remove Ignition#start from the public API
- Make Ignition a class, not an interface
- Add static Ignition#startClient
Sounds good?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 6:13 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Ignition IS the entry point to
Hi guys,
I see that the original message and its clarification is hard to consume.
The problem is that indexes are identified by their names. So, the situation
that Kirill described is a valid one:
- you have index X for columns (a, b);
- you drop it;
- you create index X for columns (a, c).
I assume DurableBackgroundTask will no longer use references to root ids.
The proposed solution looks good to me.
чт, 8 июл. 2021 г. в 10:28, Ivan Bessonov :
> Hi guys,
>
> I see that the original message and its clarification is hard to consume.
> The problem is that indexes are identified
Hi Nikolay,
Check the “svg” folders which contain most of the images we use across the
website and docs. You can build new pics out of those.
—
Denis
> On Jul 8, 2021, at 11:20 PM, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> We have many beautiful images [1] in documentation.
> I want
Hello, Igniters.
We have many beautiful images [1] in documentation.
I want to create images that have similar style with other to keep docs
consistent.
Do we have some guides or styles I can use?
[1] https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.10.0/images/ignite_clustering.png
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New test failure in master-nightly
HistoricalRebalanceTwoPartsInDifferentCheckpointsTest.testOlderPartitionUpdateFirst
Val, I have already gave examples -- lettuce, a very performant and modern
redis java client
I can duplicate links again
https://lettuce.io/core/release/api/io/lettuce/core/RedisClient.html
https://lettuce.io/core/release/api/io/lettuce/core/api/StatefulRedisConnection.html
Ivan,
I've seen the link, but I still don't understand what exactly you propose
to change in the current API, and what is your concern. Could you please
clarify? How you think Ignite API should look like?
-Val
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:18 PM Ivan Daschinsky wrote:
> Val, I have already gave
I'm sorry, but why we didn't consider to separate creation of Client and
connection? Why not to make async variant of connection? See for example [1]
[1] --- https://lettuce.io/core/release/api/index.html
чт, 8 июл. 2021 г., 09:50 Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Val,
>
> So the plan is:
>
> - Remove
Pavel,
Yes, makes sense.
-Val
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:50 PM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Val,
>
> So the plan is:
>
> - Remove Ignition#start from the public API
> - Make Ignition a class, not an interface
> - Add static Ignition#startClient
>
> Sounds good?
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 6:13 AM
Ivan,
Can you please clarify what you mean by "separate creation of client and
connection"? Can you give an example?
-Val
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 12:53 PM Ivan Daschinsky wrote:
> I'm sorry, but why we didn't consider to separate creation of Client and
> connection? Why not to make async
11 matches
Mail list logo
