Andrey,
The answer is yes, all mutator operations invoked outside of a user
transaction do create an implicit transaction. There is no way to change
the isolation or concurrency of an implicit transaction, and I cannot think
of a case when this should be changed. You can think of any implicit
tran
Anton,
Clone this repo https://github.com/chandresh-pancholi/ignite and run this
class
https://github.com/chandresh-pancholi/ignite/blob/master/modules/storm/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/stream/storm/IgniteStormStreamerSelfTestSuite.java
You will get the Error saying "Oouch,Argument is Null" f
Github user vkulichenko closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Andrey,
I tried to check out the Vert.x integration by myself and ran the test - it
passed for me. I saw some sporadic printouts from Vert.x that threads are
being blocked for a longer time than allowed, however I did not see the
exception you mentioned in IGNITE-1534. I also tried to add a separa
Hello,
I could not find any documentation that describes the behavior of data mutating
operations wrt transactions when executed against TRANSACTIONAL caches.
Specifically, I'd like to know whether or not the mutators start implicit
transactions and if so, how do I configure the properties of
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-1538:
---
Summary: Query performance is 2 times slower in OFFHEAP_TIERED mode
Key: IGNITE-1538
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1538
Project: Igni
Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-1537:
Summary: Near TX prepare future is completed early for LOCAL cache
Key: IGNITE-1537
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1537
Project: Ignite
GitHub user vkulichenko opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/104
IGNITE-1536 - Removed duplicated continuous query notifications
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vkulichenko/incubator-ignite
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-1536:
---
Summary: Duplicate notification in continuous query
Key: IGNITE-1536
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1536
Project: Ignite
Iss
Sergey Kozlov created IGNITE-1535:
-
Summary: Evicted entries still are presented
Key: IGNITE-1535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1535
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Cos, is it ok that none of the domain names mentioned in ticket responds?
Even those with "dig" output.
Created ticket for Ignite -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10484
--Yakov
2015-09-22 21:01 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
> Something like this could be arranged with INFRA
>
I couldn't reproduce IGNITE-973 but would like to get a comment from the
reporter. Maybe some points for testing of issue have been missed by me...
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote:
> I'm working to reproduce IGNITE-973
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov
> wr
I'm working to reproduce IGNITE-973
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Alex, I merged 1171 to 1.4 branch.
>
> We have very few tickets left.
>
> Guys, who is in charge of checking this -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-973? Please provide the
> update?
>
> Hop
Alexey,
I have been running Vert.x cluster manager tests today. IGNITE-1171 doesn't
reproduces anymore.
But new problem was found: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1534
I'll try to create Ignite test for this problem. I hope you have some ideas
about how to reproduce (stable) and fix
Andrey Gura created IGNITE-1534:
---
Summary: Failed to map keys for cache (all partition nodes left
the grid).
Key: IGNITE-1534
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1534
Project: Ignite
Gianfranco,
Behaviour wise it is similar. In this, data (streams) processed by map into
new stream and this new stream is processed by reduce stream.
In RS, multiple such opeartions are composed. This is as per MapReduce, RS
can exist alongside, by two means:
1. A new entity (reactive) in compute
Alex, I merged 1171 to 1.4 branch.
We have very few tickets left.
Guys, who is in charge of checking this -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-973? Please provide the update?
Hopefully, we will release tomorrow.
Thanks!
--Yakov
2015-09-23 8:37 GMT+03:00 Alexey Goncharuk :
> Yakov,
Sergey,
Thanks for detailed explanation! I agree with your suggestion, let's do
on-heap (points 1 to 3) first and then switch to off-heap.
Can you please create a parent ticket with necessary subtasks, so we can
properly track it in Jira?
D.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sergi Vladykin
wro
As part of this discussion I want to talk about non-snapshotable indexes in
general.
There are few things we can do to improve performance of queries and
indexing.
1. We can implement SkipList based index. Probably it will not be much
faster than current SnapTree, but GC and Optimizer will feel b
Chandresh,
I'm trying to analize problem.
Could you please provide more details and explain step-by-step how can I
reproduce problem?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:06 PM, chandresh pancholi <
chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not yet.
> Still doing brainstorming why StormStreamer object is ge
Yes, we should not modify existing API, to support backward compatability
and richer functionality (the primary goal of product).
It will be additional wrapper/interface available.
This will also does not break anything and we can migrate slowly.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Sergi Vladykin
Lalit,
I don't think we are going to change our APIs to some 3rd party standards
or even worse to some 3rd party library.
There is already JCache from JSR-107 and I can't say we are 100% happy with
it.
Thus I can consider Reactive Streams to be an additional optional API but
not
`All data flow/st
It ' a nice feature to be included in the grid compute module , in my
opinion . But I have a question : what difference we have with ComputeTask
class in behavioral terms ?
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/compute-tasks
2015-09-23 16:45 GMT+02:00 Lalit Kumar Jha :
> Summarizing this:
>
> *Go
Summarizing this:
*Goal*: All data flow/stream in system adhere to “Reactive Streams” API,
includes data ingestion, async computation, compute result/stream
aggregation.
*Benefits*:
- Common interface for all data transfer/exchange/processing.
- Streaming data ingestion can compose compl
Yakov, everyone is an admin in readme.io. Are you saying you cannot login?
D.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Dmitriy,
>
> Can you please check that I am still admin in readme io? I cant review the
> documentation for 1.4
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-09-20 21:55 GMT+03:00 Raul K
Yeah, in my original post I already pointed out that Reactive Streams is a
proposed standard but not an implementation.
My proposal was to go with RxJava 1.0 + the Reactive Streams adapter (
https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJavaReactiveStreams) for now, as that would
allow users to benefit from thin
I'd definitely go on a Reactive-Streams path (although I don't know what
Apache Ignite does), however, there seems to be a small confusion around RS.
RS is a set of 4 interfaces and practically unusable on its own. One needs a
library built around it such as Project Reactor, Akka Streams and RxJava
Hi,
First things first, let me clarify that I didn't request the feature myself
so I'm not advocating it ;-)
We have a vague proposition in a JIRA ticket, and my intention is to try
give it some objective essence. The team can happily close the ticket with
a "Won't Fix" if we feel that there's no
Vladimir,
Good suggestions! Could you create a JIRA ticket and put your thoughts
there? It makes sense to optimized the portable marshaller in Java as well.
--
Denis
On 9/23/2015 1:38 PM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote:
Igniters,
I was a bit concerned about portable marshalling performance in .Net a
Igniters,
I was a bit concerned about portable marshalling performance in .Net and
performed a very quick and dirty evaluation of the following optimizations:
1) For non-"marshal-aware" objects metadata is constant and can be
calculated in advance and only once.
2) The same goes for field IDs - w
Dmitriy,
Can you please check that I am still admin in readme io? I cant review the
documentation for 1.4
--Yakov
2015-09-20 21:55 GMT+03:00 Raul Kripalani :
> Hey guys,
>
> I've documented this feature on readme.io, on branch 1.4:
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/v1.4/docs/jms-data-streamer.
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
