Igniters!
Here is a handsome moment in our current cache metrics API, that begs for
an improvement and due to it significancy assumed to be discussed
communitywise. Current CacheMetrics interface is confusing for a case, when
it is accessed from a client node.
One of the typical question is:
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2567:
--
Summary: Grouping
Key: IGNITE-2567
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2567
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter:
Vladimir,
As I already suggested in the ticket [1], I think that by default we should
return metrics for the whole cluster. Now we collect them only from local
node, which is confusing, especially on the client. If one needs metrics
for one node or from subset of nodes, metrics(ClusterGroup)
Alex,
I don't know in advance how many bytes I will write because some classes
can be successfully registered, but some not. Therefore I can't extend by
more than 5 bytes at this point.
Makes sense?
-Val
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
>
Vladimir Ershov created IGNITE-2569:
---
Summary: Ignite GridComponent used incorrectly during IgniteStart.
Could cause NPE
Key: IGNITE-2569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2569
I uploaded the docs and added links under 'Documentation' menu on the
website.
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/1.5.0.final/dotnetdoc/
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/1.5.0.final/cppdoc/
-Val
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> We have doxygen
Great! Now we have to work on adding C++ documentation in readme.
D.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I uploaded the docs and added links under 'Documentation' menu on the
> website.
>
>
Agree. All metrics should return the data for the whole cache, unless
specifically specified otherwise by user.
D.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> As I already suggested in the ticket [1], I think that by default we
Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-2562:
Summary: Affix is blinking in some cases
Key: IGNITE-2562
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2562
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Val,
The code looks good to me. The only place that made me wonder was
out.unsafeEnsure(1 + 4) call which extends the stream by 5 bytes, however
we can write significantly more bytes. I see that we use the same approach
in other places, so I was wondering if this is a required call or a
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-2564:
---
Summary: CPP: Memory reallocation callback doesn't work.
Key: IGNITE-2564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2564
Project: Ignite
Issue
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-2565:
Summary: TCK suite fail periodically
Key: IGNITE-2565
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2565
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Valentin Kulichenko created IGNITE-2570:
---
Summary: LoadCacheClosure and several other classes in
GridCacheAdapter are not marked as internal
Key: IGNITE-2570
URL:
13 matches
Mail list logo