Re: JCache dependency

2016-03-27 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Romain, I am not sure what you mean by not having access to TCK. Are you talking about validating compatibility with JCAche using the TCK [1]? In this case, Apache Ignite does pass the TCK. Moreover, the TCK seems to be licensed under Apache 2.0 [2]. Can you please explain? [1]

Re: JCache dependency

2016-03-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Alpha cause asf doesnt have oracle tck so we cant validate binary compat but it targets jcache 1.0. More a legal thing than anything else. If you have access to tck and can validate the binaries we can move on 1.0 Le 27 mars 2016 00:21, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" a écrit : > Hi

Re: Semaphore blocking on tryAcquire() while holding a cache-lock

2016-03-27 Thread Vladisav Jelisavcic
Yakov, I've seen your comments, can you please check the jira again? On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > Vlad, can you please check my comments again? > > --Yakov > > 2016-03-18 17:57 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic : > > > Hi Yakov,

Re: Improving Ignite window processing support

2016-03-27 Thread Roman Shtykh
Dmitriy, Honestly I was thinking only of window processing to cover only this specific area. But I think looking at reactive streams makes sense and window processing can be implemented within reactive streams with all three delivery guarantee semantics (starting with the easiest two). Also I