Re: Allow distributed SQL query execution over explicit set of partitions

Several side notes about API. 1) I would avoid ranges even in this form.for the sake of simplicity. Ignite do not have any notion of "partition range" in affinity API, so I do not understand how users are going to work on ranges unless they have some very special custom affinity function, which

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4561) Improve JdbcTypesTransformer to make mapping more flexible

Andrey Novikov created IGNITE-4561: -- Summary: Improve JdbcTypesTransformer to make mapping more flexible Key: IGNITE-4561 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4561 Project: Ignite

Re: Partition data lost event

Val et al, Currently partition lost event is fired on nodes which should become partition owners, but did not find other partition owners to rebalance data from. In your example one of the node should have became an owner for partitions 1, 3, the other - for partitions 2, 4 (according to the

Re: Hibernate OGM for Ignite. I need a help with documentation

Hi Victor, I have tried to fix the document. However, I do have some questions. Please see my comments in the document. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZSFt9NPnN8EyOpNnNguc5-9FIDr4RfQLfAZMH0VgBPc/edit# Thanks, -Prachi On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Denis Magda wrote:

Blogs updates: 1.8 release, Redis, Microservices and more

Community, Some of us published new blog posts this month. Please go ahead and enjoy: https://ignite.apache.org/blogs.html — Denis

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1441: IGNITE-3537

GitHub user javaller reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1441 IGNITE-3537 Added tests for IgniteSet, IgniteQueue, IgniteSemaphore, IgniteLock, IgniteCountDownLatch, IgniteAtomicStamped, IgniteAtomicReference, IgniteAtomicLong. Added new testcases (

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1441: IGNITE-3537

GitHub user javaller opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1441 IGNITE-3537 Added tests for IgniteSet, IgniteQueue, IgniteSemaphore, IgniteLock, IgniteCountDownLatch, IgniteAtomicStamped, IgniteAtomicReference, IgniteAtomicLong. Added new testcases (

Re: Allow distributed SQL query execution over explicit set of partitions

I mean distributed joins. 2017-01-19 0:10 GMT+03:00 Alexei Scherbakov : > Guys, > > I've finished adding API changes and implemented proper nodes routing. > > Currently it doesn't work with distributed queries.But I think this > feature should be compatible with it.

Re: Allow distributed SQL query execution over explicit set of partitions

Guys, I've finished adding API changes and implemented proper nodes routing. Currently it doesn't work with distributed queries.But I think this feature should be compatible with it. Could anyone take a look at current branch state while I'm looking deeper into dsitributed queries code? Issue:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ignite 1.8.0 Released

You're most welcome, Denis. It's my pleasure. Of course you may include the post in your blog. Feel free to use the Apache feather for the image :^) Cheers,Sally [From the mobile; please excuse top-posting, spelling/spacing errors, and brevity] On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 15:55, Denis

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ignite 1.8.0 Released

Sally, this is amazing! Thanks for all your hard work you did helping the community to share the news widely! Could we add this blog post to our page? https://ignite.apache.org/blogs.html If yes, please share the photo you want us to use for your account.

Aleksandr Menshikov: new contributor

Community, Please welcome a new Apache Ignite contributor, Aleksandr Menshikov, who has just finished contribution of the following https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4487 Alexandr, you were added to official contributors’ list:

Re: Partition data lost event

Alex G. and Yakov should be able to clarify this since they took part in the creation of the following tickets related to partitions lost consistency https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1605

Partition data lost event

Folks, Does anyone know how the EVT_CACHE_REBALANCE_PART_DATA_LOST event is fired? I just create a small test and the result confused me. This is what I do: 1. Start several server nodes, all listen to EVT_CACHE_REBALANCE_PART_DATA_LOST event. 2. Create a cache with no backups. 3. Put some

Aliaksandr Kazlou: new contributor

Community, Please welcome a new Apache Ignite contributor, Aliaksandr Kazlou, who has just joined our team by successfully completing the following task: Passing AWSCredentialsProvider to TcpDiscoveryS3IpFinder Aliaksandr, you were added to

Re: scripting languages base cases using swig

Sounds interesting. If SWIG does its job really well than agree it worth communities efforts to give it a try. As a side note, I assume that somewhere in the future we will come to the point when Ignite will have its own Machine Learning API. For every ML lib it’s essential to support Python

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1410: ignite-4499

Github user agura closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1410 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

ApacheCon CFP closing soon (11 February)

Hello, fellow Apache enthusiast. Thanks for your participation, and interest in, the projects of the Apache Software Foundation. I wanted to remind you that the Call For Papers (CFP) for ApacheCon North America, and Apache: Big Data North America, closes in less than a month. If you've been

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1440: Ignite 3699 2

GitHub user avinogradovgg opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1440 Ignite 3699 2 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3699-2 Alternatively you can review and

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1439: IGNITE-4556 .NET: DML example

GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1439 IGNITE-4556 .NET: DML example You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ptupitsyn/ignite ignite-4556 Alternatively you can review and

Re: IGNITE-4487 - NPE on query execution

Alexander, I merged your PR to master, however I had to rewrite the test completely. Please review my changes carefully for further contributions: * The test was missing Apache License header * We do not create Ignite configuration and start nodes manually. startGrids() takes care of the

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1388: IGNITE-4487: Fixed

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1388 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

Yakov, as I understand it we need add CLUSTER_REGION_ID for each nodes in config file. And in fact using some kind of sort in nextNode method (the search for extreme values to be exact). And the existence of valid comparator is a sufficient condition to sort nodes to build new correct ring. So I

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1438: Ignite 4557

GitHub user zstan opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1438 Ignite 4557 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite IGNITE-4557 Alternatively you can review and apply these

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

Alexander, I was against any comparator and user defined logic exactly for reason that comparison may be inconsistent. After long discussion and consensus you implement approach with comparator. Can you please explain why you did not just add logic to compare the value of CLUSTER_REGION_ID node

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1437: IGNITE-4550: Move service deployment to certain t...

GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1437 IGNITE-4550: Move service deployment to certain test Fixed You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

I done that things: -- Add to TcpDiscoverySpi field Comparator nodeComparator for load custom comparators from config file like bean. -- Add implementation with old behavior: BaseNodeComparator -- Add region id implementation: RegionNodeComparator which get map from IP address to region ID in

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1436: Add extension point to reordering nodes by custom...

GitHub user SharplEr opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1436 Add extension point to reordering nodes by custom comparator. -- Add to TcpDiscoverySpi field Comparator nodeComparator for load custom comparators from config file like bean. -- Add

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4559) .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4559: -- Summary: .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default Key: IGNITE-4559 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4559 Project: Ignite Issue

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4560) .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4560: -- Summary: .NET: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default Key: IGNITE-4560 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4560 Project: Ignite Issue

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4558) Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4558: -- Summary: Use BinaryArrayIdentityResolver by default Key: IGNITE-4558 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4558 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4557) Wrong method is called on rebalancing.

Alexei Scherbakov created IGNITE-4557: - Summary: Wrong method is called on rebalancing. Key: IGNITE-4557 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4557 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ignite 1.8.0 Released

Hello everyone --as promised, we are live:  - ASF "Foundation" blog https://s.apache.org/Slah  - @TheASF Twitter feed https://twitter.com/TheASF/status/821660992522297344  - NEW! ASF LinkedIn page  https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-apache-software-foundation ... as well as to announce@ and our

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4556) .NET: DML documentation and example

Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-4556: -- Summary: .NET: DML documentation and example Key: IGNITE-4556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4556 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

Re: scripting languages base cases using swig

I think its worth trying. Recently on userlist someone requested Golang integration. If we can achieve this with SWIG relatively easy, then why not. Sergi 2017-01-18 10:55 GMT+03:00 Evgeniy Stanilovskiy : > Hi Denis, > > I don`t see any problem here, i have to speak