Andrey,
As I understand, you suggest to document every prospective feature right
now.
That would be (at least) compute, clustering, transactions, services,
messages, events, failover, data structures, metrics.
I don't think it makes sense to do that. Another problem is that it will
take weeks :)
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Andrey Gura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on WAL optimizations that improve performance
> significantly [1]. I believe it's important task and should be
> included in Apache Ignite 2.4 release.
>
> [1]
I have created a pull request for my proposed change.
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3152
-Original Message-
From: Denis Magda [mailto:dma...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2017 3:10 AM
To: dev@ignite.apache.org; Semen Boikov; Alexey Goncharuk
Subject: Fwd: [jira]
GitHub user sunnychanwork opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3152
Ignite 7083
The Cache Partition Exchange Manager kept a copy of the already completed
exchange. However, we have found that it uses a significant amount of memory.
Upon further
GitHub user shroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3151
IGNITE-7055: Fix text query to work with a particular field.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shroman/ignite IGNITE-7055
Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-7119:
Summary: Web Agent: Implement support for comma-delimited list of
node URIs
Key: IGNITE-7119
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7119
Project:
Folks,
The nearest couple of days I’m spending in Austin, TX in order to meet with
current and believe (!) future Ignite users diving into the following topics:
1. Apache Ignite Machine Learning capabilities:
https://www.meetup.com/austindata/events/245472777/
GitHub user dolphin1414 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3150
IGNITE-7015: Indexes are updated only if the indexed fields are changed.
Now if it's possible to update row in-place (without link changing), and
indexed columns haven't been changed, no
GitHub user corney opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3149
[IGNITE-3935] test case implemented
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/corney/ignite
IGNITE-3935-verification-for-deserialization
Pavel,
I have absolutely no doubts that support for all those features will be added
eventually. And if so, wouldn't it be the right thing to do to document the
operations and their semantics right now without necessarily implementing them?
It should really help to ensure that the protocol can
Oleg Ignatenko created IGNITE-7118:
--
Summary: performance measurement for distributed k-means clustering
Key: IGNITE-7118
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7118
Project: Ignite
GitHub user voipp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3148
Ignite 6846
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/voipp/ignite ignite-6846
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-7117:
--
Summary: .NET: IGNITE_HOME resolver relies on Java examples
Key: IGNITE-7117
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7117
Project: Ignite
GitHub user mcherkasov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3147
Ignite 7050
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-7050
Alternatively you can review and apply
Kirill Danilov created IGNITE-7116:
--
Summary: Logging minor issue as error instead of warning or info
Key: IGNITE-7116
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7116
Project: Ignite
GitHub user alex-plekhanov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3146
IGNITE-6867 JMX metrics for topology monitoring - redesign
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/alex-plekhanov/ignite
Hi,
I'm working on WAL optimizations that improve performance
significantly [1]. I believe it's important task and should be
included in Apache Ignite 2.4 release.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6339
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
>
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-7115:
--
Summary: .NET: Thin client: performance: use buffer pool
Key: IGNITE-7115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7115
Project: Ignite
Issue
Why it should not be open?
That's just a tool allows to merge something.
Since we're not using PR's in github's way - I see no reason to close them.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> > Could you please explain profit of doing this?
> The point is that
> Could you please explain profit of doing this?
The point is that pull requests should not be left open.
Either close them manually or use that autoclose feature.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> >> There is corresponding
> >>
Pavel,
>> There is corresponding
>> modules\platforms\dotnet\Apache.Ignite.Core\Cluster\IClusterMetrics.cs in
>> .NET.
Got it.
>> PS Looks like you don't close pull requests when merging them to master.
>> Please make sure to include "This closes #prnum" in the commit messages,
>> as the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3142
---
GitHub user ilantukh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3145
Test necessity to keep NOOP txEntry for READs.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-gg-12885-master
GitHub user zstan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3144
IGNITE-7112 More informative: Failed to wait PME
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-7112
Evgenii Zhuravlev created IGNITE-7114:
-
Summary: C++ node can't start without java examples folder
Key: IGNITE-7114
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7114
Project: Ignite
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-7113:
---
Summary: "Key is missing from query" when creating table with
key_type=java.lang.String
Key: IGNITE-7113
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7113
GitHub user asfedotov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3143
IGNITE-7085 When PDS is enabled and IGNITE_BINARY_SORT_OBJECT_FIELDS â¦
â¦is set and IgniteCache#put is called node hangs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Anton,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6869 adds new properties to
ClusterMetrics.
There is corresponding
modules\platforms\dotnet\Apache.Ignite.Core\Cluster\IClusterMetrics.cs in
.NET.
Actually, IGNITE-6869 has a comment from Vladimir about this.
Same thing for IGNITE-6870,
GitHub user oleg-ostanin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3142
IGNITW-7093 added plugin to build test.jar to ignite-compatibility poâ¦
â¦m.xml
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Stanilovsky Evgeny created IGNITE-7112:
--
Summary: Non informative "Failed to wait for partition map
exchange" message.
Key: IGNITE-7112
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7112
Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-7111:
Summary: NPE in ignite.dataRegionMetrics() on INACTIVE cluster
Key: IGNITE-7111
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7111
Project: Ignite
GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3141
IGNITE-7095: close & cleanup internal H2 JDBC Connection
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite
Pavel,
These changes mostly about JMX Beans.
Could you please explain what should be added to .Net? Provide some
examples please.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn
wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> Looks like none of the new metrics are added on .NET side.
> Please
GitHub user dspavlov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3140
IGNITE-7017: Archiver disabled WAL mode in case folders are equal
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite
Andrey,
All of this is to come :)
Prachi,
1) There are no flags, see the doc
2) String is simply 4 byte length (n) + n bytes
3) Op codes have changed
writeByteLittleEndian(1051, out); // Type code
writeIntLittleEndian(20, out); // String length
out.writeUTF("myNewCache"); // Cache name
On
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3119
---
36 matches
Mail list logo