Re: Performance drop with New Monitoring.

2019-07-02 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Hello Nikolay,

I will take a look shortly.

вт, 2 июл. 2019 г. в 14:30, Nikolay Izhikov :

> Guys.
>
> I've prepared PR to fix this issue.
> Who want to review it?
>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6656
>
> В Пн, 01/07/2019 в 15:17 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет:
> > Hello, Igniter.
> >
> > I think we should fix the issue with slight changes in internal API (was
> not released yet).
> >
> > Changes in API was independently proposed by me and Alexey Plekhanov [1]:
> >
> > 1. We should introduce `MetricGroup` - collection of metric of one
> specific Ignite entity(io subsystem, data region, cache, etc.).
> >
> > 2. We can remove entire `MetricGroup` (on cache or cache group destroy)
> with complexity of O(1).
> >
> > 3. We can remove metric from `MetricGroup` with complexity of O(1).
> >
> > [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11920?jql=labels%20%3D%20IEP-35%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20ASC
> >
> > В Пт, 28/06/2019 в 19:10 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет:
> > > Hello, Maksim.
> > >
> > > I will take a look shortly.
> > >
> > > В Пт, 28/06/2019 в 19:02 +0300, Maksim Stepachev пишет:
> > > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > >
> > > > I see that the ticket - "[IGNITE-11848] New Monitoring. Phase1"
> breaks cache stop performance. It affects next tests:
> testParallelStartAndStop, testStartManyCaches
> > > >
> > > > The spent time was increased 6 times:(
> > > >
> > > > Look at:
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?tab=testDetails_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E=IgniteTests24Java8=-145777872614811891=4
>


Re: Signing off Ignite for export beyond the U.S.

2019-07-02 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi Igniters,

I've created a new page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Crypto+Notice and added
the last step for the release process - Update ECCN matrix.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

ср, 26 июн. 2019 г. в 14:07, Dmitriy Pavlov :

> Sure, up to you.
>
> I've committed the readme (it is mandated by the crypto process).
>
> Later I will copy all relevant crypto-notice related information to wiki
> and update release process with extra double-checking step.
>
> ср, 26 июн. 2019 г. в 01:04, Denis Magda :
>
>> Dmitry, thanks. As for the ordering, the list is not fully ordered. Looks
>> like the projects were added to the end. I would leave it as is for now.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 5:42 PM Dmitriy Pavlov 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Denis thank you,
>> >
>> > I see updates in the matrix so I've removed source XMLs from the local
>> > ignite-11932 branch.
>> >
>> > In the matrix in the ASF site, other projects seem to be sorted
>> > alphabetically. Maybe we should place Ignite near Incubator.
>> >
>> > I will commit & update the wiki, but for now, requests to
>> > https://gitbox.apache.org  are timed out from my laptop. I will retry
>> in
>> > 10
>> > hours.
>> >
>> > Sincerely
>> > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> >
>> >
>> > вт, 25 июн. 2019 г. в 23:58, Denis Magda :
>> >
>> > > In addition to that, how about adding an item for Ignite release
>> policy
>> > to
>> > > validate that there are no cryptography related changes?
>> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Denis Magda
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:54 PM Denis Magda 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Dmitry,
>> > > >
>> > > > I've updated the ASF website by including Ignite to the exports
>> matrix
>> > > > [1]. Plus, notified the controlling U.S. entities on the matter.
>> > > >
>> > > > Could you please do one more favor and help to close these two items
>> > > > (flying on a plane and a poor Internet connection makes it
>> impossible
>> > to
>> > > > check them off on my end)?
>> > > >
>> > > >- Update README.txt in Ignite master with the content prepared
>> > earlier
>> > > >by you
>> > > >- Copy content of this doc [2] to Ignite Wiki
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>> > > > [2]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s15HnsE40hHl0QN2aX0hJ3atw9_LO19_mzhgM96rcbo/edit?usp=sharing
>> > > >
>> > > > -
>> > > > Denis
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:47 PM Dmitriy Pavlov 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Pavel replied to me in private: encryption is available since 2.4
>> for
>> > > .Net
>> > > >> thin client.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I've also modified source XML
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6616/files#diff-1995c8a78832996cb48db91f7550479cR8
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> чт, 20 июн. 2019 г. в 00:10, Denis Magda :
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Pavel,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I still have no info related to starting version of .NET
>> encryption
>> > > >> > > support. So I supposed it was 1.5.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Could you please help with this last open item?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Dmitry, thanks for the final summary. I'll contact ASF folks
>> trying
>> > to
>> > > >> find
>> > > >> > the ASF website dev instructions.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > --
>> > > >> > Denis Magda
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:35 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <
>> dpav...@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Hi Denis,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > I still have no info related to starting version of .NET
>> > encryption
>> > > >> > > support. So I supposed it was 1.5.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > I've started both XSTLs and added an example of both XLTs
>> output
>> > to
>> > > >> > google
>> > > >> > > doc tabs. One transformer is for email template generation
>> > (requires
>> > > >> > > project name), another is for the site table.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Only one TODO now left in the PR version of the update. All
>> other
>> > > >> stuff
>> > > >> > is
>> > > >> > > ready for publishing:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6616/files#diff-1995c8a78832996cb48db91f7550479cR8
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Sincerely,
>> > > >> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > P.S. I'm not sure that dev. the list will keep formatting, but
>> > > anyway
>> > > >> > here
>> > > >> > > is transformer output example as text.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Apache Ignite Project
>> > > >> > > Product Name Versions ECCN
>> > > >> > > Controlled Source
>> > > >> > > Apache Ignite development 5D002
>> > > >> > > ASF, Oracle, The OpenSSL Project, Microsoft, .NET Foundation,
>> > > JCraft,
>> > > >> > Inc.,
>> > > >> > > The Eclipse Foundation
>> > > >> > > 2.5.0 - latest 5D002
>> > > >> > > ASF, Oracle, The OpenSSL Project, Microsoft, .NET Foundation,
>> > > JCraft,
>> > > >> > Inc.,
>> > > >> 

Re: SpiUriDeploy TC job fails on Java 9+

2019-07-02 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello!

I have just tried, looks like it is buildable with Java 12 (provided that
-Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true is specified)

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


пн, 1 июл. 2019 г. в 22:04, Павлухин Иван :

> Hi,
>
> SpiUriDeploy fails on TC when it is run with any Java 9+ version [1].
> The reason is very simple, it contains one preliminary build step
> which is forced to run with Java 8. But for Java 9+ builds we pass
> module-related arguments and consequently it leads to Java 8 failure
> (unknown argument). I tried to run that step on JDK used for all other
> steps but faced a compilation error. It was on Java 9 and it said that
> target version 11 was not supported. Due to some reason we configure
> 11 in parent pom for
> java-9+ profile.
>
> In my mind simple solution here is to set target version to 9. But
> perhaps there is a clever way to use maximum version supported by a
> used JDK.
>
> Do you have an ideas?
>
> [1]
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_SpiUriDeploy_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E=buildTypeStatusDiv
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin
>


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11957) IdleVerify command should print end time of execution.

2019-07-02 Thread Andrey Kalinin (JIRA)
Andrey Kalinin created IGNITE-11957:
---

 Summary: IdleVerify command should print end time of execution.
 Key: IGNITE-11957
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11957
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Andrey Kalinin
Assignee: Andrey Kalinin






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11956) Cache topology changes during test run on stable topology

2019-07-02 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev (JIRA)
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-11956:


 Summary: Cache topology changes during test run on stable topology
 Key: IGNITE-11956
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11956
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Ilya Kasnacheev


I am fixing a test GridCachePartitionedTxMultiNodeSelfTest which starts 4 nodes 
with cache defined in node configuration, and proceeds running queries. Query 
fail with exception: "Server topology is changed during query execution inside 
a transaction. It's recommended to rollback and retry transaction."

The following log message is generated:

[2019-06-04 19:47:02,410][INFO 
][exchange-worker-#712%near.GridCachePartitionedTxMultiNodeSelfTest0%][time] 
Started exchange init [topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, 
minorTopVer=1], crd=true, evt=DISCOVERY_CUSTOM_EVT, 
evtNode=374107c7-953a-42b2-8595-9bc0, 
customEvt=CacheAffinityChangeMessage 
[id=e1d41732b61-5761dee7-7e89-498e-94b2-334d4b743b3c, 
topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=0], exchId=null, 
partsMsg=null, exchangeNeeded=true], allowMerge=false]

Note that test is currently broken so you just need to fix that one issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11955) Fix control.sh issues related to IGNITE-11876 and IGNITE-11913

2019-07-02 Thread Denis Chudov (JIRA)
Denis Chudov created IGNITE-11955:
-

 Summary: Fix control.sh issues related to IGNITE-11876 and 
IGNITE-11913
 Key: IGNITE-11955
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11955
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Denis Chudov
Assignee: Denis Chudov


Umbrella ticket for control.sh issues related to IGNITE-11876 and IGNITE-11913



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


Re: Performance drop with New Monitoring.

2019-07-02 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Guys.

I've prepared PR to fix this issue.
Who want to review it?

https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6656

В Пн, 01/07/2019 в 15:17 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет:
> Hello, Igniter.
> 
> I think we should fix the issue with slight changes in internal API (was not 
> released yet).
> 
> Changes in API was independently proposed by me and Alexey Plekhanov [1]:
> 
> 1. We should introduce `MetricGroup` - collection of metric of one specific 
> Ignite entity(io subsystem, data region, cache, etc.).
> 
> 2. We can remove entire `MetricGroup` (on cache or cache group destroy) with 
> complexity of O(1).
> 
> 3. We can remove metric from `MetricGroup` with complexity of O(1).
> 
> [1] 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11920?jql=labels%20%3D%20IEP-35%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20ASC
> 
> В Пт, 28/06/2019 в 19:10 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет:
> > Hello, Maksim.
> > 
> > I will take a look shortly.
> > 
> > В Пт, 28/06/2019 в 19:02 +0300, Maksim Stepachev пишет:
> > > Hello, Igniters.
> > > 
> > > I see that the ticket - "[IGNITE-11848] New Monitoring. Phase1" breaks 
> > > cache stop performance. It affects next tests: testParallelStartAndStop, 
> > > testStartManyCaches 
> > > 
> > > The spent time was increased 6 times:( 
> > > 
> > > Look at: 
> > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?tab=testDetails_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E=IgniteTests24Java8=-145777872614811891=4


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Hello

2019-07-02 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov
Hi Vladimir,

I've added this user to the Contributors role, now you can assign an issue
to yourself.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

вт, 2 июл. 2019 г. в 13:22, Vladimir Malinovskiy :

> Hi!
> I want to start working on IGNITE-11954
> Please and me to the contributor list
> My jira username is vmalinovskiy
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:32 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
> >
> > Hello Vladimir and welcome aboard!
> >
> > Please get to know the process and share your JIRA id once you're ready
> to
> > take on a task:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/community/contribute.html#contribute
> >
> > -
> > Denis
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:46 AM Vladimir Malinovskiy <
> > vmalinovs...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > > My name is Vladimir Malinovskiy.
> > > Please register me as Ignite developer.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Vladimir Malinovskiy
> > > Software Engineer, Moscow
> > > +7-753-767-36-24
> > > https://www.gridgain.com
> > > Powered by Apache® Ignite™
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Vladimir Malinovskiy
> Software Engineer, Moscow
> +7-753-767-36-24
> https://www.gridgain.com
> Powered by Apache® Ignite™
>


Re: Hello

2019-07-02 Thread Vladimir Malinovskiy
Hi!
I want to start working on IGNITE-11954
Please and me to the contributor list
My jira username is vmalinovskiy

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:32 PM Denis Magda  wrote:
>
> Hello Vladimir and welcome aboard!
>
> Please get to know the process and share your JIRA id once you're ready to
> take on a task:
> https://ignite.apache.org/community/contribute.html#contribute
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:46 AM Vladimir Malinovskiy <
> vmalinovs...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > My name is Vladimir Malinovskiy.
> > Please register me as Ignite developer.
> >
> > --
> > Vladimir Malinovskiy
> > Software Engineer, Moscow
> > +7-753-767-36-24
> > https://www.gridgain.com
> > Powered by Apache® Ignite™
> >



-- 
Vladimir Malinovskiy
Software Engineer, Moscow
+7-753-767-36-24
https://www.gridgain.com
Powered by Apache® Ignite™


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11954) control.sh should log actions performed

2019-07-02 Thread Vladimir Malinovskiy (JIRA)
Vladimir Malinovskiy created IGNITE-11954:
-

 Summary: control.sh should log actions performed
 Key: IGNITE-11954
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11954
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Vladimir Malinovskiy


control.sh must log all actions performed to work/log/control-utility.log

The fields logged should be as follows:
 * date and time of action start and finish

 * version of utility

 * command name and arguments

 * user issued command

 * session id

 * log level

 * action error code and/or status message

All the same fields but for log level and and session should be also logged to 
console.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11953) BTree corruption caused by byte array values

2019-07-02 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)
Dmitriy Govorukhin created IGNITE-11953:
---

 Summary: BTree corruption caused by byte array values
 Key: IGNITE-11953
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Dmitriy Govorukhin


In some cases for caches with cache group, we can get BTree corruption 
exception.

{code}
09:53:58,890][SEVERE][sys-stripe-10-#11][] Critical system error detected. Will 
be handled accordingly to configured handler [hnd=CustomFailureHandler 
[ignoreCriticalErrors=false, disabled=false][StopNodeOrHaltFailureHandler 
[tryStop=false, timeout=0]], failureCtx=FailureContext [type=CRITICAL_ERROR, 
err=class o.a.i.i.transactions.IgniteTxHeuristicCheckedException: Committing a 
transaction has produced runtime exception]]class 
org.apache.ignite.internal.transactions.IgniteTxHeuristicCheckedException: 
Committing a transaction has produced runtime exception
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxAdapter.heuristicException(IgniteTxAdapter.java:800)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxLocalAdapter.userCommit(IgniteTxLocalAdapter.java:922)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxLocalAdapter.localFinish(GridDhtTxLocalAdapter.java:799)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxLocal.localFinish(GridDhtTxLocal.java:608)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxLocal.finishTx(GridDhtTxLocal.java:478)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxLocal.commitDhtLocalAsync(GridDhtTxLocal.java:535)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.finishDhtLocal(IgniteTxHandler.java:1055)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.finish(IgniteTxHandler.java:931)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.processNearTxFinishRequest(IgniteTxHandler.java:887)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler.access$200(IgniteTxHandler.java:117)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler$3.apply(IgniteTxHandler.java:209)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.transactions.IgniteTxHandler$3.apply(IgniteTxHandler.java:207)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1129)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:594)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:393)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:319)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$100(GridCacheIoManager.java:109)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$1.onMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:308)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1568)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.processRegularMessage0(GridIoManager.java:1196)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4200(GridIoManager.java:126)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$9.run(GridIoManager.java:1092)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.StripedExecutor$Stripe.body(StripedExecutor.java:504)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:119)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: class 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.CorruptedTreeException:
 Runtime failure on search row: SearchRow [key=KeyCacheObjectImpl [part=427, 
val=Grkg1DUF3yQE6tC9Se50mi5w.T, hasValBytes=true], hash=1872857770, 
cacheId=-420893003]
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree.invoke(BPlusTree.java:1811)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl$CacheDataStoreImpl.invoke0(IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl.java:1620)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl$CacheDataStoreImpl.invoke(IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl.java:1603)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.GridCacheOffheapManager$GridCacheDataStore.invoke(GridCacheOffheapManager.java:2131)
at 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl.invoke(IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl.java:442)
at 

Re: Ignite Modularization

2019-07-02 Thread Павлухин Иван
Denis,

> I think this should be optional. Do you think we need to do it in the first 
> instance

In my opinion we should at least have a solid understanding of the
subject. I think it worth having a separate discussion regarding Java
9 modules. Today java modular subsystem seems to be not widely adopted
yet. And many Java library developers are satisfied delivering their
jars to be used as automatic modules. I think that today Java 8 is the
most widely used version. But the situation can change soon and we
should keep our eyes peeled.

вт, 2 июл. 2019 г. в 00:39, Denis Magda :
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> 1. I did not get from IEP whether Thin Clients have a separate
> > repository and a release lifecycle or not.
>
>
> Sorry for the confusion. Yes, such clients have to be in separate repos and
> might have their own lifecycles. Updated the wiki.
>
>
> > 2. Are we going to exclude tests for unsupported modules from Ignite
> > TeamCity?
>
>
> Yes, that's my thinking, an unsupported integration won't be part of Ignite
> modular ecosystem and won't be tested by the community. Any objections?
>
>
> > 3. Will we adress implementing Java 9+ modules during that process?
>
>
> I think this should be optional. Do you think we need to do it in the
> first instance?
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:45 PM Павлухин Иван  wrote:
>
> > Hi Denis,
> >
> > I fully support the idea. Could you please clarify on following points:
> > 1. I did not get from IEP whether Thin Clients have a separate
> > repository and a release lifecycle or not.
> > 2. Are we going to exclude tests for unsupported modules from Ignite
> > TeamCity?
> > 3. Will we adress implementing Java 9+ modules during that process?
> >
> > чт, 27 июн. 2019 г. в 18:11, Denis Magda :
> > >
> > > Ignite developers and users,
> > >
> > > I'd like us to consider Ignite modularization as part of Ignite 3.0
> > > timeframe. Presently, Ignite codebase mixes both core capabilities with
> > 3rd
> > > party integrations. It leads to the following:
> > >
> > >- Cumbersome and continuously growing codebase with many 3rd-party
> > >dependencies.
> > >- Some of the integrations are questionable and should no longer be
> > >supported by the community at all.
> > >- Integrations evolution is bound to Ignite release cycles even though
> > >no changes are needed in the core.
> > >- Ignite community has to support everything (test, release, fix,
> > >continue development) which requires to have particular integration
> > experts
> > >on a permanent basis - doesn't work.
> > >
> > > Here is an IEP:
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization
> > >
> > > Please review it, share feedback. Pay attention to the list of
> > integrations
> > > that should no longer be supported by the community.
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > Denis
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Ivan Pavlukhin
> >



-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin


[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-11952) Bug fixes and improvements in console utilities & test fixes

2019-07-02 Thread Sergey Chugunov (JIRA)
Sergey Chugunov created IGNITE-11952:


 Summary: Bug fixes and improvements in console utilities & test 
fixes
 Key: IGNITE-11952
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11952
 Project: Ignite
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Sergey Chugunov
Assignee: Sergey Chugunov
 Fix For: 2.8






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


Re: [PROBLEM] Is TC down?

2019-07-02 Thread Павлухин Иван
Sorry for that. Now everything works completely fine for me. Seems to
be some surprise from my ISP.

вт, 2 июл. 2019 г. в 09:18, Павлухин Иван :
>
> Igniters,
>
> Currently TC web UI is not loaded in my environment and reports
> ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT. Is the problem on my side or is TC down?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin



-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin


[PROBLEM] Is TC down?

2019-07-02 Thread Павлухин Иван
Igniters,

Currently TC web UI is not loaded in my environment and reports
ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT. Is the problem on my side or is TC down?

-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin