[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [5131154] needs to be handled

2020-03-16 Thread dpavlov . tasks
Hi Igniters, I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than welcomed to help. If your changes can lead to this failure(s): We're grateful that you were a volunteer to make the contribution to this project, but things change and you may no longer be able to

Re: подписаться

2020-03-16 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
A note for curious ones. Dev-list requires moderation for messages from unsubscribed addresses. As the initial message was delivered without moderation I suppose Kirill had been already subscribed at that (roughly) moment. Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 15:45, Кирилл Пушенко

Re: IGNITE-8152

2020-03-16 Thread Denis Magda
Hi Aleksei, Thanks for driving the resolution of the ticket. As I see @Taras Ledkov and @Andrey Mashenkov has already stepped in as reviewers and I believe they will look at your changes soon. - Denis On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:48 AM Aleksei Litsov wrote: > Hello Igniters! > > I send PR for

deadlock in system pool on meta update

2020-03-16 Thread Sergey-A Kosarev
Classification: Public Hi, I've recently tried to apply Ilya's idea (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12663) of minimizing thread pools and tried to set system pool to 3 in my own tests. It caused deadlock on a client node and I think it can happen not only on such small pool

Re: Reference of local service.

2020-03-16 Thread Andrey Gura
Vladimir, >> We won’t affect existing services > How exactly will we affect services without special interface? Please see > the benchmarks in previous email. I talk about backward compatibility, not about performance. But it doesn't matter because... see below. My fault. From discussion I

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

2020-03-16 Thread Denis Magda
Artem, I'll create a ticket for the IGFS docs replacement once we publish the new website that we'll have all the references needed to create new pages that will replace the IGFS content. @Yuriy Gerzhedovich , could you please help with the SQL questions? - Denis On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:22

Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes in Ignite release process related to documentation

2020-03-16 Thread Andrey Gura
Denis, I agree with you. Also I think that we should move to process which will require documentation updates during work on issue/feature and will part of code review process. Such approach has some useful benefits: - Documentation readiness at the same time when fix/implementation is ready

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12791) [IEP-39] Management API to cancel user provided tasks and queries - documentation

2020-03-16 Thread Nikolay Izhikov (Jira)
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-12791: Summary: [IEP-39] Management API to cancel user provided tasks and queries - documentation Key: IGNITE-12791 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12791

Re: [DISCUSSION][IEP-39] Management API to cancel user provided tasks and queries.

2020-03-16 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Igniters. PR [1] for the IEP-39 [2] are ready to be reviewed. Ticket [3]. Can someone, please, review my changes I propose to introduce the following features to Ignite management APIs. 1. JMX beans ``` ComputeMXBean#cancel(String sessionId); QueryMXBean#cacncelSQL(String id)

Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes in Ignite release process related to documentation

2020-03-16 Thread 18624049226
Hi Denis, My suggestion is that in the current version release process, when planning to release a version, first determine the Time, Scope and ReleaseManager. On this basis, we can add another work of documentation, which is to determine which documents need to be written and who should

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8.1 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-03-16 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Folks, I've walked through all the commits to master since 2.8 branch was cut and filtered some tickets that in my opinion are worth including to 2.8.1 release below (note that they are ready end the effort of including them to the release should be low as long as there are no implicit

Re: Security Subject of thin client on remote nodes

2020-03-16 Thread Denis Garus
Hello, Alexei! I agree with you if we may not care about compatibility at all, then we can solve the problem much more straightforward way. In your case, the method GridSecurityProcessor#authenticate will have an implicit contract: [ if actx.subject() != null then returns SecurityContext

Re: подписаться

2020-03-16 Thread Кирилл Пушенко
Thank you! I have already subscribed. пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 15:00, Ilya Kasnacheev : > Hello! > > The following mailto should subscribe you to this list: > mailto:dev-subscr...@ignite.apache.org > ?subject=Subscribebody=Please%20subscribe%20me. > > As you can notice, both email and subject are

Re: Change vendor name in Apache Ignite

2020-03-16 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! Can you please show an example of that XML (with sensitive information masked) so that we can understand what is going on? Thanks, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 00:39, Mahmoud Rashwan : > Hello, > > First of all, please let me thank you for the great tool, we're using it >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8.1 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-03-16 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, guys. I propose myself as a release manager for 2.8.1. > 16 марта 2020 г., в 14:19, kpushenko написал(а): > > Hi, igniters! > > I would like to propose a discussion of version 2.9 and scope releases for > 2020 to another discussion thread. > > I understand that there is no objection

Re: подписаться

2020-03-16 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! The following mailto should subscribe you to this list: mailto:dev-subscr...@ignite.apache.org ?subject=Subscribebody=Please%20subscribe%20me. As you can notice, both email and subject are different. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 14:05, Maksim Stepachev : > Please

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8.1 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-03-16 Thread kpushenko
Hi, igniters! I would like to propose a discussion of version 2.9 and scope releases for 2020 to another discussion thread. I understand that there is no objection to release 2.8.1. I support the date from Maxim and dmagda ~ 1 month to May 1. I offer my help with the release of Ignite 2.8.1. I

Re: подписаться

2020-03-16 Thread Maksim Stepachev
Please type it in English. пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 13:28, Кирилл Пушенко : > -- > С уважением, > *Кирилл Пушенко* >

IGNITE-8152

2020-03-16 Thread Aleksei Litsov
Hello Igniters! I send PR for ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8152 I fixed all the comments on the ticket. Could you see the solution. If you need anything else, I am open for suggestions. If everything is ok, please accept the PR and I will take the next task

подписаться

2020-03-16 Thread Кирилл Пушенко
-- С уважением, *Кирилл Пушенко*

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improvement in control.sh configuration.

2020-03-16 Thread Mikhail Petrov
Nikolay, specified ticket only describes the mentioned feature. It's not a ticket of the current proposal. On 16.03.2020 12:14, Dmitrii Ryabov wrote: Hello! Nikolay, yes, but currently, we can't declare user attributes through control.sh. пн, 16 мар. 2020 г., 12:06 Nikolay Izhikov : Hello,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improvement in control.sh configuration.

2020-03-16 Thread Dmitrii Ryabov
Hello! Nikolay, yes, but currently, we can't declare user attributes through control.sh. пн, 16 мар. 2020 г., 12:06 Nikolay Izhikov : > Hello, Mikhail. > > Can you, please, double-check link to the ticket? > > For now it’s a IGNITE-12049 Add user attributes to thin clients which is > resolved.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Improvement in control.sh configuration.

2020-03-16 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Mikhail. Can you, please, double-check link to the ticket? For now it’s a IGNITE-12049 Add user attributes to thin clients which is resolved. > 16 марта 2020 г., в 12:04, Mikhail Petrov написал(а): > > Hello, Igniters. > > I'd like to propose a small improvement in control.sh

[DISCUSSION] Improvement in control.sh configuration.

2020-03-16 Thread Mikhail Petrov
Hello, Igniters. I'd like to propose a small improvement in control.sh configuration, which is to add the ability to pass parameters needed for cluster connection via a special properties file located in the same directory as control.sh script. The connection parameters in the proposed

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12789) Tracking page repairing has no WAL record associated with it

2020-03-16 Thread Ivan Bessonov (Jira)
Ivan Bessonov created IGNITE-12789: -- Summary: Tracking page repairing has no WAL record associated with it Key: IGNITE-12789 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12789 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12788) Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready) state metric

2020-03-16 Thread Anton Vinogradov (Jira)
Anton Vinogradov created IGNITE-12788: - Summary: Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready) state metric Key: IGNITE-12788 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788 Project:

Re: Ignite 2.8 documentation

2020-03-16 Thread Artem Budnikov
Can anyone give some details about those missing features so I can document them? -Artem On 15.03.2020 05:31, 18624049226 wrote: Hi, I don't know the missing part. Is there any developer willing to add it? In addition, as far as I know, IGFS and Hadoop accelerator related components of