Hi Denis,
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.
https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
This document should be incomplete. At present, there are only
descriptions related to DEB package, which is much less than the
original one.
In addition, with regard to
Hi,
Thanks for finding the time and walking through the documentation pages. We
didn't intend to copy the docs as is. There are a lot of structural changes
as well as complete rewrites of pages.
Also, some of the old pages were skipped deliberately, if they were about
legacy or rarely used APIs.
Hi Denis,
I have roughly compared the new document with the original document. The
corresponding page in the list below shows that the new version of the
document is missing or incomplete, please confirm it again.
I didn't check every paragraph of the new document, so this is just a hint.
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New test failure in master
GridCacheContinuousQueryMultiNodesFilteringTest.testWithNodeFilter
Apache Ignite is a trademark in the U.S. and we're still working to get it
registered in China. It's a long process that can span years. It took us
years. Not to say about all the content that is published and indexed for
the "Apache Ignite" term. These are the two primary reasons why I don't
Hi Denis,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you interpret the term
"database" as just storage, separating it from processing capabilities. I
would disagree with that. *Any* database provides such capabilities. Even
traditional relational databases, which are based on SQL, allow you to
operations will be denied in a future release
[14:01:40]__
[14:01:40] / _/ ___/ |/ / _/_ __/ __/
[14:01:40] _/ // (7 7// / / / / _/
[14:01:40] /___/\___/_/|_/___/ /_/ /___/
[14:01:40]
[14:01:40] ver. 2.9.0#20201002-sha1:d40bed4f
[14:01:40] 2020 Copyright(C
Thanks Pavel! Merged.
Alright, guys, we've finished with the porting of all useful pages to the
new docs engine as well as documented all the primate Ignite 2.9
enhancements.
On Monday (Oct 5ht), I'll do some final tweaks and start integrating the
feature branch into the master.* Refrain from
Ilya,
Please see below.
-Val
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 1:54 AM Ilya Kasnacheev
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I don't like reliance on ignitectl utility. It should be available but it
> should be accompanied by some Java API in my opinion.
>
I think there will be an API, but that's more about the design
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*New Critical Failure in master MVCC Cache 7
https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_MvccCache7?branch=%3Cdefault%3E
No changes in the build
-
Dear Community,
I have uploaded a release candidate to:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/2.9.0-rc1/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/packages_2.9.0-rc1/
The following staging can be used for testing:
Igor Seliverstov created IGNITE-13515:
-
Summary: Performance drop when there are many thin clients per
server
Key: IGNITE-13515
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13515
Project:
Hello!
Thank you for your effort, Andrey!
I have answered to your comment and took care of the rest.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 14:21, Andrey Mashenkov :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Thanks for the notice.
> I've reviewed these PRs. They all look good, but I have few questions.
>
Denis, IGNITE-13331 is ready for your review
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13331
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:42 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Denis,
>
> Thanks a lot for porting those changes, great job!
> I'm working on IGNITE-13331, sorry for the delay.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at
Aleksey Plekhanov created IGNITE-13514:
--
Summary: Apache Ignite Slim edition builds without
config/default-config.xml
Key: IGNITE-13514
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13514
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13513 - ticket created.
> 2 окт. 2020 г., в 11:53, ткаленко кирилл написал(а):
>
> Kolya, hi!
> This seems to sound good!
>
> 02.10.2020, 11:43, "Nikolay Izhikov" :
>> Hello, Igniters.
>>
>> Crawled through the WAL code and wonder - do we really
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-13513:
Summary: Remove WALPointer and use FileWALPointer
Key: IGNITE-13513
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13513
Project: Ignite
Issue
Maksim Timonin created IGNITE-13512:
---
Summary: Provide a check that all test are part of any TestSuite.
Alert otherwise
Key: IGNITE-13512
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13512
Hi Ilya,
Thanks for the notice.
I've reviewed these PRs. They all look good, but I have few questions.
Please, take a look.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:06 PM Ilya Kasnacheev
wrote:
> Hello fellow developers!
>
> It seems that we have problems with our review process currently, which
> wasn't
Hello!
I think this is sensible approach, but please make sure that our
experimental features enabling patterns are unaffected.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 1 окт. 2020 г. в 14:45, Данилов Семён :
> Hello!
>
> I added message
> "JVM_OPTS environment variable is set, but will not be used.
Anton Kalashnikov created IGNITE-13511:
--
Summary: Unified configuration
Key: IGNITE-13511
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13511
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New Feature
Hello!
I didn't, since I consider writing directly to private email addresses too
intrusive. I would rather see my commits reviewed by folks who have time
rather than trying to persuade original ticket creator who does not have
time.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 1 окт. 2020 г. в 18:41,
Sergei Ryzhov created IGNITE-13510:
--
Summary: Getting status of snapshot execution via command line and
jmx
Key: IGNITE-13510
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13510
Project: Ignite
Pavel Pereslegin created IGNITE-13509:
-
Summary: Support encrypted caches in ducktape tests
Key: IGNITE-13509
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13509
Project: Ignite
Kolya, hi!
This seems to sound good!
02.10.2020, 11:43, "Nikolay Izhikov" :
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> Crawled through the WAL code and wonder - do we really need WALPointer
> interface?
> As far as I can see it has only one implementation FileWALPointer.
> And all usages of WALPointer expect
Hello, Igniters.
Crawled through the WAL code and wonder - do we really need WALPointer
interface?
As far as I can see it has only one implementation FileWALPointer.
And all usages of WALPointer expect FileWALPointer.
I propose to get rid of WALPointer.
WDYT?
Ivan Daschinskiy created IGNITE-13508:
-
Summary: Test scenario of two-phased rebalance (PDS reduce)
Key: IGNITE-13508
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13508
Project: Ignite
27 matches
Mail list logo
