Re: ignite-extenisions naming policy

2020-10-09 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Petr, Can you please share if the tag you are referring to is git release tag or changes required in some other file? If it is git release tag we can follow the naming convention as ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure-ext-1.0.1 going forward. Regards, Saikat On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:11 AM Petr

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Mikhail, Also once the changes are complete please add modules details and Testsuites in the teamcity build config https://ci.ignite.apache.org/admin/editBuildParams.html?id=buildType:Tests_IgniteExtensions_Build Regards, Saikat On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 7:09 AM Mikhail Petrov wrote: > Ilya,

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Nikolay, I have reviewed the PR and shared my comments. Ilya, My thoughts are that as soon the ignite 2.9.0 is released we should be able to release the ignite-extensions module 1st version pointing to ignite-core 2.9.0 version. So, for example ignite-flink-ext version 1.0.0 will be

[MTCGA]: new failures in builds [5651661] needs to be handled

2020-10-09 Thread dpavlov . tasks
Hi Igniters, I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than welcomed to help. *New Critical Failure in master-nightly Disk Page Compressions https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_DiskPageCompressions?branch=%3Cdefault%3E No changes

Re: Instance of IgniteClient in Multi threaded application

2020-10-09 Thread Denis Magda
It's preferable to use a single client connection. The clients are multi-threaded, if I'm not mistaken. Btw, what type of the client you use (.NET, Java, ...)? - Denis On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 7:53 AM midulaj wrote: > Hi Igniters, > > If we are using ignite in a web service,can we reuse single

Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-10-09 Thread Denis Magda
Nikolay, re: the minor improvements. I'm not against of including those if we can prepare the docs before the vote starts. Presently, the docs are "frozen" for the 2.9 release, but I can scratch some time and take part in the docs review the next week. - Denis On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:40 AM

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Denis Magda
How do we release all the modules that have already been moved to the extensions repository? https://github.com/apache/ignite-extensions/tree/master/modules For instance, when 2.9 comes out and the users start bumping up their Ignite versions in pom.xml, what should they set for Kafka, camel,

Re: Introduction

2020-10-09 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Bojidar, Sincerely I never used an approach with attaching patch files. It would be great if you can open PR. I suppose we should check with the Community whether a patch file approach is outdated and delete the section from the guide if it is. 2020-10-09 18:27 GMT+03:00, Bojidar Marinov : >

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! In any case, we need to release *something* and wait for it to be used by actual users. Currently this is not happening since 2.8.1 contains all extensions as modules. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 9 окт. 2020 г. в 15:12, Nikolay Izhikov : > Ilya. > > My understanding is the

Re: Introduction

2020-10-09 Thread Bojidar Marinov
Hey Ivan, According to the "How to contribute" document, submitting patch files is a valid alternative to github pull requests, refs https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-2.CreateaPatch-file . If that information is outdated, I would happily open a

Re: Introduction

2020-10-09 Thread Bojidar Marinov
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Ivan Pavlukhin wrote: > Hi Bojidar, > > Welcome to the Apache Ignite Community! > > Thanks! > I added your account to a contributors list, now you can assign > tickets to yourself. Am I getting it right that your contribution is > in .NET part? > > Indeed, it is a

Instance of IgniteClient in Multi threaded application

2020-10-09 Thread midulaj
Hi Igniters, If we are using ignite in a web service,can we reuse single IgniteClient for all requests or we have to create IgniteClient for each requests?? -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Introduction

2020-10-09 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Hi Bojidar, Welcome to the Apache Ignite Community! I added your account to a contributors list, now you can assign tickets to yourself. Am I getting it right that your contribution is in .NET part? Also it could be helpful to get familiar with a contribution process

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Maksim Stepachev
+1 I said about it few months ago. пт, 9 окт. 2020 г., 15:13 Nikolay Izhikov : > Ilya. > > My understanding is the following - there is no such thing as «Ignite > Extensions release» > We can and should release each module separately. > > You can take as an example - spring-boot-autoconfigure

Re: IEP-53 Maintenance Mode: request for review

2020-10-09 Thread Sergey Chugunov
Hi Pavel, Thanks, I looked through your comments and fixed them. Could you please check one more time? On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 10:27 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > Hello Sergey, > > I went over the public API changes briefly and left some minor comments on > GitHub > > Thanks, > Pavel > > On Fri,

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13569) disable archiving + walCompactionEnabled probably broke reading from wal on server restart

2020-10-09 Thread Anton Kalashnikov (Jira)
Anton Kalashnikov created IGNITE-13569: -- Summary: disable archiving + walCompactionEnabled probably broke reading from wal on server restart Key: IGNITE-13569 URL:

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Ilya. My understanding is the following - there is no such thing as «Ignite Extensions release» We can and should release each module separately. You can take as an example - spring-boot-autoconfigure extension release. I made it without releasing any other modules. This mean - we can release

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Mikhail Petrov
Ilya, I haven't meant that removal of spring-data from Ignite main repository should be done before the 2.9 release and be included in it. Migration of spring-data to ignite-extensions could help us to make SpringData integration updates available for users earlier then the next Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13568) Calcite integration. Decrease bounds of index scan

2020-10-09 Thread Yury Gerzhedovich (Jira)
Yury Gerzhedovich created IGNITE-13568: -- Summary: Calcite integration. Decrease bounds of index scan Key: IGNITE-13568 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13568 Project: Ignite

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! I mean the Apache Ignite 2.9 release and Ignite Extensions 1.0 release. Once we get that in the wild and gather a few months of feedback (or lack thereof) then we can go on with it. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 9 окт. 2020 г. в 12:42, Nikolay Izhikov : > Ilya, we should move

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13567) TcpDiscoverySpi: incorrect value of the joiningNodeClient flag for the joining client

2020-10-09 Thread Amelchev Nikita (Jira)
Amelchev Nikita created IGNITE-13567: Summary: TcpDiscoverySpi: incorrect value of the joiningNodeClient flag for the joining client Key: IGNITE-13567 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13567

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [5643882] needs to be handled

2020-10-09 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Denis, I would suggest to stay on a safe ground and associate an every commit with a ticket until we have a Community decision about relaxing this process for documentation tickets. As far as I remember sometimes as an exception we use a single ticket number for multiple commits (e.g. fix

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Данилов Семён
+1 And, as a matter of fact, I think that spring data integration should be in spring-projects organization, just like spring-data-neo4j, spring-data-mongodb and the others. This way we will always have spring-data integration working correctly with the latest version of spring-data.

ignite-extenisions naming policy

2020-10-09 Thread Petr Ivanov
Hi, Igniters. While working with ignite-extensions, I've faced some mismatch with naming of tag for extension: Artifact is 'ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure-ext' Module is 'spring-boot-autoconfigure-ext' But tag is 'ignite-spring-boot-1.0.0' Can we: 1. match tag name with either module

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13566) Calcite integration. Table size statistics for cost planer

2020-10-09 Thread Yury Gerzhedovich (Jira)
Yury Gerzhedovich created IGNITE-13566: -- Summary: Calcite integration. Table size statistics for cost planer Key: IGNITE-13566 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13566 Project:

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Ilya, we should move modules that is not related to Ignite core to extension. We shouldn’t support all possible integrations in the Ignite itself. > I would argue that it should only moved to extensions last, > when this process is debugged thoroughly and when we have at least one > "essentials

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! -1 from me for now. "Since Spring Data integration is actively used (compared to most others), I would argue that it should only moved to extensions last, when this process is debugged thoroughly and when we have at least one "essentials + extensions" release shipped with feedback. I

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
+1. Saikat, can you, please, take a look? > 9 окт. 2020 г., в 11:54, Nikita Amelchev написал(а): > > Mikhail, > > +1 for migrate > > чт, 8 окт. 2020 г. в 18:34, Mikhail Petrov : >> >> Igniters, >> >> I propose to migrate spring-data modules from ignite main repository to >>

Re[2]: Broken test in master: BasicIndexTest

2020-10-09 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Of course, i still have no ticket filled. As was discussed in private i will fill other ticket that can lead to potential problems.     >Hi everyone, > >I believe I have a fix for this bug -  >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13500, So Zhenya you can leave >this problem to me. > >-- 

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13564) Improve SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED reporting.

2020-10-09 Thread Ivan Daschinskiy (Jira)
Ivan Daschinskiy created IGNITE-13564: - Summary: Improve SYSTEM_WORKER_BLOCKED reporting. Key: IGNITE-13564 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13564 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: Migration of spring-data modules to ignite-extensions

2020-10-09 Thread Nikita Amelchev
Mikhail, +1 for migrate чт, 8 окт. 2020 г. в 18:34, Mikhail Petrov : > > Igniters, > > I propose to migrate spring-data modules from ignite main repository to > ignite-extensions. > > > Are there any objections? > > > I've created ticket [1] and PR to both ignite [2] and ignite-extensions > [3]

Re: Broken test in master: BasicIndexTest

2020-10-09 Thread Anton Kalashnikov
Hi everyone, I believe I have a fix for this bug -  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13500, So Zhenya you can leave this problem to me. --  Best regards, Anton Kalashnikov 09.10.2020, 10:19, "Sergey Chugunov" : > Max, > > Thanks for spotting this, great catch! > > Zhenya, could

Re: Apache Ignite 2.9.0 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2020-10-09 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Igniters. I prepared a patch [1] for blocker ticket [2] - «Server node fail and stops in case wrong datatype put in indexed field» Can someone, please, help me with the review? [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8330 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13553

Re: IEP-53 Maintenance Mode: request for review

2020-10-09 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Hello Sergey, I went over the public API changes briefly and left some minor comments on GitHub Thanks, Pavel On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 9:59 AM Sergey Chugunov wrote: > Hello Igniters, > > I'm getting closer to finishing main ticket for Maintenance Mode feature > [1] and now working on test

Re: Broken test in master: BasicIndexTest

2020-10-09 Thread Sergey Chugunov
Max, Thanks for spotting this, great catch! Zhenya, could you please file a ticket of at least Critical priority? On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Zhenya Stanilovsky wrote: > > > Thanks Maxim, the test is correct no need for removal. > I checked 2.9 too, but looks it all ok there. I will take a

IEP-53 Maintenance Mode: request for review

2020-10-09 Thread Sergey Chugunov
Hello Igniters, I'm getting closer to finishing main ticket for Maintenance Mode feature [1] and now working on test fixes (most likely test modifications are needed). So I would like to ask for a review of my pull request [2] to discuss the code earlier. Test status is pretty good so I expect

Re: Broken test in master: BasicIndexTest

2020-10-09 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Thanks Maxim, the test is correct no need for removal. I checked 2.9 too, but looks it all ok there. I will take a look. >Hi, Igniters! > >I was discovering how indexes work and found a failed test. >BasicIndexTest#testInlineSizeChange is broken in master and it's not a >flaky case [1]. But it