Re: [DISCUSS] Missed (non-suited) tests

2021-02-24 Thread Max Timonin
Hi, Petr! Profile "check-test-suites" handles all tests in another way, it just verifies that all tests are suited. No tests run then. As I understand the [BUILD] job goal is preparing a .zip archive to distribute it for other jobs. I think it is a valid place to put sanity checks. If a check

Re: TeamCity agent aitc-lin07_04 fails to run Build

2021-02-24 Thread Petr Ivanov
I'm sorry, I forgot to write on dev-list about this agent. Indeed the target files were removed manually. > On 24 Feb 2021, at 19:32, Max Timonin wrote: > > Looks like somebody fixed that. An hour ago Build succeeded at last [1]. It > was the first successful job for a long time. Thanks! > >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14241) IgniteCacheAbstractQuerySelfTest#testClientQueryExecutedEventsIncludeSensitive broken

2021-02-24 Thread Nikolay Izhikov (Jira)
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-14241: Summary: IgniteCacheAbstractQuerySelfTest#testClientQueryExecutedEventsIncludeSensitive broken Key: IGNITE-14241 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14241

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14240) Handle authentication error on python thin client properly

2021-02-24 Thread Ivan Daschinskiy (Jira)
Ivan Daschinskiy created IGNITE-14240: - Summary: Handle authentication error on python thin client properly Key: IGNITE-14240 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14240 Project:

Re: [DISCUSS] Missed (non-suited) tests

2021-02-24 Thread Max Timonin
Hi, all! What do you think if we add the check in the TC [Build] job. Currently [Build] runs also check for licences, checkstyle [1]: mvn *install* -Pall-java,all-scala,scala,*licenses*,lgpl,examples, *checkstyle* -DskipTests -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true %MAVEN_MODULES_STRING%. So let's add the

Re: TeamCity agent aitc-lin07_04 fails to run Build

2021-02-24 Thread Max Timonin
Looks like somebody fixed that. An hour ago Build succeeded at last [1]. It was the first successful job for a long time. Thanks! removed directory '/opt/buildagent/.m2/repository/org/apache/ignite' Process exited with code 0 [1]

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14239) Raft based implementation of atomic protocol

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14239: Summary: Raft based implementation of atomic protocol Key: IGNITE-14239 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14239 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14238) Creating and destroying caches

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14238: Summary: Creating and destroying caches Key: IGNITE-14238 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14238 Project: Ignite Issue

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14237) Affinity function

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14237: Summary: Affinity function Key: IGNITE-14237 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14237 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14236) Provide a new version of cache API

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14236: Summary: Provide a new version of cache API Key: IGNITE-14236 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14236 Project: Ignite Issue

Apache Ignite 3 / RPM

2021-02-24 Thread Petr Ivanov
Hi, Igniters. Sincerely asking you to help me with testing new RPM package for apache ignite 3.x [1] Currently what is needed to be tested — successful installation and binary run under most of RHEL based distributions: Red Hat, CentOS, Oracle Linux, Fedora, etc. Any other thoughts and

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14235) Provide a minimal cache/table configuration

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14235: Summary: Provide a minimal cache/table configuration Key: IGNITE-14235 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14235 Project: Ignite

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [5882649] needs to be handled

2021-02-24 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Igniters, Did not we agree on disabling MVCC suites? Why does TC bot still run them? 2021-02-20 8:16 GMT+03:00, Atri Sharma : > I ran the MVCC Test Suite 7 on branch with my changes a couple of > times with no failures. > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM wrote: >> >> Hi Igniters, >> >> I've

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14234) Tracing framework

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14234: Summary: Tracing framework Key: IGNITE-14234 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14234 Project: Ignite Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14233) Metrics framework

2021-02-24 Thread Vyacheslav Koptilin (Jira)
Vyacheslav Koptilin created IGNITE-14233: Summary: Metrics framework Key: IGNITE-14233 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14233 Project: Ignite Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14232) IgniteCliInterfaceTest and ProgressBarTest fails in some terminals

2021-02-24 Thread Kirill Gusakov (Jira)
Kirill Gusakov created IGNITE-14232: --- Summary: IgniteCliInterfaceTest and ProgressBarTest fails in some terminals Key: IGNITE-14232 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14232 Project:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14231) IGNITE_ENABLE_FORCIBLE_NODE_KILL flag is not supported in inverse connection request scenario

2021-02-24 Thread Sergey Chugunov (Jira)
Sergey Chugunov created IGNITE-14231: Summary: IGNITE_ENABLE_FORCIBLE_NODE_KILL flag is not supported in inverse connection request scenario Key: IGNITE-14231 URL:

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

2021-02-24 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
Anton, Your improvement is very important, for sure, but it's almost 2 months have passed since the initiation of the release branch. I think we should prepare the changes as fast as possible for now and initiate with the next one release. In general, it would be nice to have a release plan for

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14230) Port DynamicConfiguration to new underlying configuration framework.

2021-02-24 Thread Ivan Bessonov (Jira)
Ivan Bessonov created IGNITE-14230: -- Summary: Port DynamicConfiguration to new underlying configuration framework. Key: IGNITE-14230 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14230 Project:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14229) Calcite bug. Engine can hangs

2021-02-24 Thread Yury Gerzhedovich (Jira)
Yury Gerzhedovich created IGNITE-14229: -- Summary: Calcite bug. Engine can hangs Key: IGNITE-14229 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14229 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14228) Ducktape test of rebalance for in-memory mode

2021-02-24 Thread Dmitriy Sorokin (Jira)
Dmitriy Sorokin created IGNITE-14228: Summary: Ducktape test of rebalance for in-memory mode Key: IGNITE-14228 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14228 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14227) Partition map exchange may hang if the cluster is deactivated during cache start failure handling.

2021-02-24 Thread Pavel Pereslegin (Jira)
.1], sockAddrs=HashSet [/127.0.0.1:47500], discPort=47500, order=1, intOrder=1, lastExchangeTime=1614163031766, loc=false, ver=2.11.0#20210224-sha1:, isClient=false], topVer=2, msgTemplate=null, span=o.a.i.i.processors.tracing.NoopSpan@7e02a8f5, nodeId8=02c46b75, msg=null, type=DISCOVERY

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-14226) Ducktape test of rebalance

2021-02-24 Thread Dmitriy Sorokin (Jira)
Dmitriy Sorokin created IGNITE-14226: Summary: Ducktape test of rebalance Key: IGNITE-14226 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14226 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Test

Re: Apache Ignite 3.x: order in repository

2021-02-24 Thread Petr Ivanov
I'd guess that one of the main problem with inactive PRs is in creation of PR for reviewing but merging it from command line (not via GitHub interface). Also, of course, there are lots of efforts which are abandoned after first review, or even do not have a chance to be reviewed at all. > On

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Apache Ignite Release 2.10 (time, scope, manager)

2021-02-24 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Maxim, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13873 Is ready for review, is it possible to wait for it? On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:01 AM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Folks, > > > I'd like to cherry-pick to the release branch the following fixes: > > Fix security context for JDBC bulk-load