Hello, Mikhail!
Proposed realization provides a security plugin when
isAuthenticationEnabled is true and,
in this way, makes IgniteSecurity enabled. But current implementation of
IgniteAuthenticationProcessor (security plugin)
does not allow:
- apply a security policy, so authorization does
Hello,
Thank you for taking a look.
I am not sure what the confusion is. On the current iteration of PR, I
am able to build and release and looking in the location you
mentioned, I see:
Atris-MacBook-Pro-15:libs atrisharma$ cd optional/
Atris-MacBook-Pro-15:optional atrisharma$ cd
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
If your changes can lead to this failure(s): We're grateful that you were a
volunteer to make the contribution to this project, but things change and you
may no longer be able to
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-14465:
Summary: Add the ability to activate the cluster via the Python
thin client
Key: IGNITE-14465
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14465
Project: Ignite
Hi Nikolay,
As a main spark integration maintainer, do you have any plans for upgrading
spark dependencies to version 3+? I see that some users are asking for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13181.
Thanks,
Evgenii
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-14464:
Summary: Remove released version of Ignite from regular ducktests
Key: IGNITE-14464
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14464
Project: Ignite
Hello!
Were you successful with using it from the deliverable of mvn initialize
-Prelease?
Please refer for example to aws module dependencies section:
com.amazonaws
aws-java-sdk-core
${aws.sdk.version}
com.amazonaws
aws-java-sdk-s3
${aws.sdk.version}
Hello!
I have added you to contributors role.
Please make sure to read
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 1 апр. 2021 г. в 16:27, Игорь Гусев :
>
> Hi all!
> I am Igor Gusev, and I am an experienced technical writer. I am
Hi all!
I am Igor Gusev, and I am an experienced technical writer. I am learning
in-memory processing technologies and would be glad to contribute to the
community. Please give me access to Apache Ignite Jira.
My JIRA ID is igusev.
Thanks in advance!
Igor
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-14463:
Summary: Support check Ignite-based products with ducktests
Key: IGNITE-14463
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14463
Project: Ignite
Maxim Muzafarov created IGNITE-14462:
Summary: Enable EmptyCatchBlock checkstyle check
Key: IGNITE-14462
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14462
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-14461:
-
Summary: Track down those who initiated a query
Key: IGNITE-14461
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14461
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Andrey,
> Reactive abstractions look more suitable for Queries rather than
> cache/table async operations and don't offer the power of chaining like
> CompletableStage.
Could you please elaborate what capabilities do you mean? AFAIK there
are quite powerful APIs for singular reactive
Alexey Scherbakov created IGNITE-14460:
--
Summary: Implement RAFT server stub
Key: IGNITE-14460
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14460
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Hi Denis!
Thank you for the PR!
I've left a comment.
Best regards,
Mirza Aliev
чт, 1 апр. 2021 г. в 11:48, Denis Mekhanikov :
> Hi everyone!
>
> I've prepared a PR for the following issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13399
> Currently on Java 8 CpuLoad metric is reported to
Val,
I just complain JDK CompletableFuture itself is not ideal, but already
implemented, well-known and tested.
It still a good alternative compared to custom future implementation to me.
Ok, I feel most of us agree with CompletableFuture as a replacement for
custom IgniteFuture.
Let's try to use
Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-14459:
-
Summary: Affinity call may fail if called upon merged exchanges
Key: IGNITE-14459
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14459
Project: Ignite
Hi everyone!
I've prepared a PR for the following issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13399
Currently on Java 8 CpuLoad metric is reported to be equal to -1 when
running in embedded mode.
Could anyone take a look?
Thanks!
Denis
Kirill Tkalenko created IGNITE-14458:
Summary: Fix flaky IgniteLocalWalSizeTest
Key: IGNITE-14458
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14458
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
19 matches
Mail list logo