Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5435:
Summary: JDBC thin: support statement close on completion
Key: IGNITE-5435
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5435
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5425:
Summary: JDBC thin: support client info
Key: IGNITE-5425
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5425
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
yzhda...@gridgain.com>>
Hello guys!
I want to discuss and suggest some format and place for pinting info
about partition distribution to log from issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4756
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4756>
What do you think about
hare your thoughts, ideas and
concerns.
—
Denis
--
Best Regards, Vyacheslav
--
Best Regards, Vyacheslav
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5384:
Summary: JDBC Driver: implement ResultSet#getDate(int, Calendar)
Key: IGNITE-5384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5384
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5344:
Summary: JDBC Driver: support Statement.closeOnCompletion
Key: IGNITE-5344
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5344
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
;DEFAULT" is reserved SQL keyword.
Personally I prefer "public".
Any other thoughts?
Vladimir.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5320
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5260:
Summary: JDBC Driver: implement SQLWarning supportion
Key: IGNITE-5260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5260
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5255:
Summary: JDBC Driver: support DML
Key: IGNITE-5255
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5255
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5237:
Summary: JDBC Driver: support client info
Key: IGNITE-5237
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5237
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5236:
Summary: JDBC Driver: implement Connection.isValid througn PING
message
Key: IGNITE-5236
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5236
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5235:
Summary: JDBC Driver: impelemnt prepared statement
Key: IGNITE-5235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5235
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5234:
Summary: JDBC Driver: support connection and query timeout
Key: IGNITE-5234
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5234
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5233:
Summary: JDBC Driver: implement metadata support
Key: IGNITE-5233
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5233
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5176:
Summary: JDBC Driver: implement query execution for thin jdbc
driver based on common odbc/jdbc protocol
Key: IGNITE-5176
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5176
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5163:
Summary: JDBC Driver: thin jdbc driver is based on pure TCP
protocol
Key: IGNITE-5163
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5163
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5128:
Summary: Support queries for GridClientData
Key: IGNITE-5128
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5128
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5126:
Summary: Support batches for thin client based JDBC driver
Key: IGNITE-5126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5126
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-5101:
Summary: Stabilize IgfsSizeSelfTest
Key: IGNITE-5101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5101
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Test
Igor,
I see that you are the main contributor of the ignite-cassandra-* modules.
Could you please review the changes at the ingite-cassandra-store module
for the issue IGNITE-5036.
Please take a look at the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5036
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail
to nodes where the
specific executor is configured.
On 18.04.2017 18:00, Christos Erotocritou wrote:
I assume its not currently possible to constrain an executor pool to be started
only on a specific node?
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
480e-9be1-512bc320
Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4699
Please share your thoughts or ask questions.
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4956:
Summary: Stabilize the test
IgniteCacheLockPartitionOnAffinityRunAtomicCacheOpTest.testNotReservedTxCacheOp
Key: IGNITE-4956
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE
ceptable.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org
wrote:
We should have it enabled by default.
--Yakov
2017-04-10 12:42 GMT+03:00 Sergi Vladykin <
sergi.vlady...@gmail.com
:
Why wouldn't we have useBalancer always enabled?
Sergi
2017-04-10 12:31 GMT+03:0
2.0. We have to clearly document that
the same
affinity function must provide the same partition assignments for
all the
caches.
Also I know that Taras Ledkov was working on a decent stateless
replacement
for FairAffinity, so we should not loose anything here.
, additional one, or maybe force user to provide his own Executor?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4477
Thanks!
-Dmitry.
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4915:
Summary: Remove deprecated methods at the public API
Key: IGNITE-4915
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4915
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4839:
Summary: Remove CacheTypeMetadata
Key: IGNITE-4839
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4839
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4827:
Summary: Remove: some backward compatibility
Key: IGNITE-4827
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4827
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4824:
Summary: Remove: AffinityTask.affinityKey method
Key: IGNITE-4824
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4824
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4756:
Summary: Print info about partition distribution to log
Key: IGNITE-4756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4756
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
rmally I would
leave deprecation unless there is a strong reason to remove it.
Thoughts?
Vladimir.
--
Sergey Kozlov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
Denis,
I've fixed javadocs for affinityRun/affinityCall.
Please review the changes at the PR:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1550
On 08.12.2016 12:06, Taras Ledkov wrote:
Denis,
The second point is absolutely correct.
The rebalancing isn't blocked. The partition will not be evicted
Denis,
Please review the javadoc of the affinity jobs.
PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1550
On 08.12.2016 12:06, Taras Ledkov wrote:
Denis,
The second point is absolutely correct.
The rebalancing isn't blocked. The partition will not be evicted while
the partition is reserved
Boikov <sboi...@gridgain.com> wrote:
Hi Taras,
Why 'async' methods return ComputeTaskFuture, not just IgniteFuture? It
seems that ComputeTaskFuture is needed only for tasks?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
wrote:
Gents
I've
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4584:
Summary: Async API: Tests refactoring to use new async API
Key: IGNITE-4584
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4584
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4583:
Summary: Async API: Other components refactoring
Key: IGNITE-4583
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4583
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4582:
Summary: Async API: IgniteFileSystem refactoring
Key: IGNITE-4582
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4582
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4581:
Summary: Async API: IgniteCache refactoring
Key: IGNITE-4581
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4581
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4580:
Summary: Async API: Refactoring IgniteCompute
Key: IGNITE-4580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4580
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
GitHub user taras-ledkov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1368
IGNITE-4462: Remove grid name from HadoopIgfsEndpoint
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4462
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4462:
Summary: IGFS client must use only IGFS name for in-proc mode
Key: IGNITE-4462
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4462
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4431:
Summary: Default forma of the ignite log doesn't contain a data.
Key: IGNITE-4431
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4431
Project: Ignite
Denis,
The second point is absolutely correct.
The rebalancing isn't blocked. The partition will not be evicted while the
partition is reserved.
I'll update javadoc ASAP.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Taras,
>
> There is a question in regards to
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-4369:
Summary: ReentranLocks hands on unlock when node is stopped.
Key: IGNITE-4369
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4369
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3931:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocations. Fix tests &
stabilization
Key: IGNITE-3931
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3931
Pro
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3858:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in methods:
create / append
Key: IGNITE-3858
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3858
Project
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3857:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in methods:
listPaths / listFiles
Key: IGNITE-3857
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3857
Project
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3856:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in method:
mkdirs
Key: IGNITE-3856
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3856
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3855:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in method:
delete
Key: IGNITE-3855
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3855
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3853:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in method:
update
Key: IGNITE-3853
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3853
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3854:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in method:
rename
Key: IGNITE-3854
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3854
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3852:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in method: info
Key: IGNITE-3852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3852
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3851:
Summary: IGFS: Support direct PROXY mode invocation in method:
exists
Key: IGNITE-3851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3851
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3800:
Summary: IGFS: Local secondary: Add tests for local fs properties
Key: IGNITE-3800
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3800
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3676:
Summary: Fix the test IgfsDualAbstractSelfTest#testOpenNoPrefetch
Key: IGNITE-3676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3676
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3670:
Summary: IGFS: Local secondary: Add test for listPath() method
called for symlink to directory
Key: IGNITE-3670
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3670
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3664:
Summary: IGFS: Local secondary: Support blockSize attribute
Key: IGNITE-3664
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3664
Project: Ignite
Issue
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3638:
Summary: Implement rename at the LocalIgfsSecondaryFileSystem
Key: IGNITE-3638
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3638
Project: Ignite
Issue
12:59, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
I replied in the ticket.
--Yakov
2016-07-11 12:43 GMT+03:00 Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>:
Hi,
Dmitry, thanks for your comments.
I've updated the ticket with the reasons of my version of the API changes.
I'm OK with the both version of the API.
Ig
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3558:
Summary: Affinity task hangs when Collision SPI produces a lot of
job rejections & Failover SPI produces many attempts
Key: IGNITE-3558
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com> wrote:
Igniters,
The issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 is updated
with comment
about the changes at the IgniteCompute. Please comment the ticket.
The changed javadoc of the affinityRun/Call is available to
as well. To my
knowledge, this feature ensures that a partition will not be migrated while
affinityRun/Call is executed, right?
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com> wrote:
Igniters,
Please take a look at the next proposal of changes at
IgniteCompute.affin
est, then why we allow it only
for "affinity" methods? We can resort to "with" semantics instead:
IgniteCompute.*withPartitionsToLock*(...).affinityRun();
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
wrote:
Igniters,
Lets discuss the changes of
th" semantics instead:
IgniteCompute.*withPartitionsToLock*(...).affinityRun();
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
wrote:
Igniters,
Lets discuss the changes of public API at the IgniteCompute.
The new methods affinityRun & affinityCall is added by wor
irs of the cache name and array of partitions that
must be reserved on the target node before job execution.
Dmitry, colleagues, please comment or approve.
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
lain why MatchError happens?
--
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3192:
Summary: Leaks at the GridCacheQueryManager on iterator canceling
Key: IGNITE-3192
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3192
Project: Ignite
Taras Ledkov created IGNITE-3099:
Summary: Race condition on the order of events
Key: IGNITE-3099
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3099
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
201 - 269 of 269 matches
Mail list logo