Re: IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

you have a look? > > Pavel > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > Looks good to me. > > > > Best Regards, > > Igor > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.

Re: IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

when the second one is 0xFF80. >> >> So it's just made a minus sign look a little redundant and pointless to me >> in C++ code. >> >> Best Regards, >> Igor >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com&g

Re: IGNITE-4374 - Ignite should validate JVM and OS configuration and output warning in log

Hi, I changed the output. Please, review it again) If something is bad, I will quickly correct. Thanks. 2017-01-25 18:24 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > GridPerformanceSuggestions isn't changed. > > JVM checks are encapsulated in JvmConfigurationSuggesti

Re: IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Igor, >> >> I didn't change the CPP code before approval approach. >> I shall write directly, sorry. >> >> But I made CPP changes already. >> >> > TestE

Re: Test failures

I vote for the master-branche without failed-tests) I understand that impossible to make it quickly. We shall aim at this approach. It will be more comfortable to us to develop. 2017-02-08 12:17 GMT+03:00 Alexander Fedotov : > Hi, > > I would agree with Aleksey.

IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

Hello. I fixed it. Please, review. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3196 - Marshaling works wrong for the BigDecimals that have negative scale

Re: IGNITE-2626 Binary marshaller: sort fields alphabetically

Hello. Look at the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4695 - Write primitive fields before during binary object marshalling Maybe it relates. 2017-02-16 11:18 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV : > im going to take

Re: IGNITE-3422 - ready for review

> > > Hi Vyacheslav, > > > > Thank you for contribution. I reviewed implementation again and now I am > in > > doubts whether our product would really benefit from it or not. See my > > comments in the ticket. I'de prefer Denis Magda to chime in and give his > > feed

Re: IGNITE-3422 - ready for review

think this over and propose design. > > — > Denis > > > On Feb 22, 2017, at 2:41 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Guys, let's discuss a goal of this task. > > > > I need the task specification. > > > > >

Re: DML & Transactions

Hello everyone. Sergi, you wrote about the MVCC. It's very interesting and perspective. Someone already does it? 2017-02-09 9:25 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan : > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Yakov Zhdanov > wrote: > > > Guys, I think we should

Re: Questions of the Ignite Configurations

Vladimir, thanks for your answers. 2017-02-15 13:32 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>: > Hi Vyacheslav, > > Answering your questions: > > 1. Yes > 2. Yes > 3. Only binary infrastructure > 4. Yes > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Vyacheslav D

Questions of the Ignite Configurations

Hello everybody. I have some questions about classes of configuration in the Ignite. 1. IgniteConfiguration - is it only one instance per Ignite-node? 2. BinaryConfiguration - is it only one instance per Ignite-node? 3. Does BinaryConfiguration relates only to binary-infrastructure or I can

IGNITE-3422 - ready for review

Hello everyone. Please, review implemented solution. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3422 - No way to control object initialization during deserialization/unmarshalling ci.tests

IGNITE-4158 - ready for review

Hello. I did it. Please, review. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4158 - Implement Time type for binary protocol. latest ci.tests

Re: IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

te: > > > + Vladimir Ozerov > > > > It would be better if Vladimir Ozerov does the final review considering > > all the changes in .NET, C++ and Java. > > > > Vladimir, could you do that? > > > > — > > Denis > > > > > On Feb 7, 2017, at 5

Re: IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

ture, and minor versions should not break > existing code. > > Pavel > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Pavel, thanks. > > > > What about PR to master-branch? > > > > 2017-02-10 16:55 GMT

Re: IGNITE-3196 - ready for review

Thanks for your explanation. 2017-02-10 18:18 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>: > You can close it. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I meant what I need to do with opened PR? > >

IGNITE-4611 - ready for review

Hello everyone. I think it's ready for review: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4611 - Write IgniteUuid with BinaryMarshaller ci.tests

Re: IGNITE-3422 - ready for review

Guys, any thoughts? 2017-02-23 13:22 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > I think it makes a sense to define factory in IgniteConfiguration, as the > Map<Class, InstanceFactory> which will be ised when deserializing. > > Interface example: > > pub

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

I checked it: jdk8u121_x64 - *fine* jdk8u91_x64 - *fail* It is strange. 2017-03-02 11:53 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>: > I used Oracle JDK 1.8.0_91 > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > De

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

Denis, Sergey witch version of JDK8 do you use? I got this exception with the lates jdk-8u121. Building with flag "-Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true" works fine. Look at "*New --allow-script-in-comments option for javadoc":* http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u121-relnotes-3315208.html

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

Guys, I found that. apache-ignite-1.9.0-src\parent\pom.xml line: 940 We need to remove flag "--allow-script-in-comments", it is new, and not capability with version less than jdk8u121_x64 I can create PR with fix, or you can just fix it yourself. 2017-03-02 12:35 GMT+03:00 Vyachesl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

>> Which one is true? This one true for https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/1.9.0-rc1: jdk8u121_x64 - *fine* jdk8u91_x64 - *fail 2017-03-02 12:52 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > >> I got this exception with the lates jdk-8u121. > I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

ext one > >> jdk8u121_x64 - *fine* > >> jdk8u91_x64 - *fail* > > Which one is true? > > I have no compilation errors at latest 1.8.0_121-b13 > > Anyways, I'm looking for better solution. > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

; >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins: > maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.1:jar > >> (module-javadoc) on project ignite-tools: MavenReportException: Error > while > >> creating archive: > >> [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - javadoc: error - Ar

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

Anton, a workaround solution: 2017-03-02 13:39 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > Anton, I found it too. > > And I confirm, it is the main reason of building-error. > > If remove ., then: > "mvn clean package -DskipTests" > jdk1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

at 2:17 PM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com > > > wrote: > > > Vyacheslav, > > > > I see strange spaces and newlines here, please make a pull request, to > > solve possible formation issues. > > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:04 P

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.9.0 RC1

Anton, please be careful: my PR doesn't contain the flag "--allow-script-in-comments flag" 2017-03-02 15:26 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > Anton, I think I found better way. > > Please, look at: > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1586/fi

Hello everyone

Hello everyone. I want to help community with development of Apache Ignite. I was wondering if you could give me some advice. With best regards, Vyacheslav Daradur

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

n Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, Alex! > > > > I think it is a great idea. > > > > I suggest to build communications between nodes on weight (or priority). > > > > For example, ordering on laten

Re: IGNITE-4374 - Ignite should validate JVM and OS configuration and output warning in log

Yakov, I have looked at source codes and I agree with you. Let's rename GridPerformanceSuggestions to ConfigurationSuggestions and to add new checks to suggestOptimizations method in IgniteKernal or separate method. 2016-12-27 14:51 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: &g

Re: IGNITE-4374 - Ignite should validate JVM and OS configuration and output warning in log

I mean ConfigurationValidator as another class, not GridPerformanceSuggestion. And invoke it from IgniteKernal. 2016-12-27 14:46 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > >> > 3. I think this should be a new section in performance suggestion out

Re: IGNITE-4374 - Ignite should validate JVM and OS configuration and output warning in log

>> 3. I think this should be a new section in performance suggestion output. And I think the GridPerformanceSuggestions should be used, but it should be probably renamed to reflect its new role and remove Grid prefix also. How about ConfigurationSuggestions? >> How about: public class

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

I have described a task: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4501 and linked a bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4499 Alex Menshikov, maybe you will take her? 2016-12-27 13:32 GMT+03:00 Alexei Scherbakov : > 2016-12-27 10:42 GMT+03:00

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

>> Vyacheslav, please elaborate on how we can determine whether we are on the same rack. I am not sure this is possible in general case. Please see my suggestions below. >> I thought of latency values. Latency between host nodes < Latency between same rack nodes < Latency between subnet nodes <

IGNITE-4464 - JclLogger ignores IGNITE_QUIET system property

Hello everyone. I want to pick up https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4464 as my first issue. Please add me as contributor.

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

>> Vyacheslav, I agree that latency increase in the way you describe, but I still don't understand how we use this information in discovery. Latency may differ from time to time depending on many factors. I still think that arc approach is more intuitive for user and easier to implement. >> Way

Re: IGNITE-4464 - JclLogger ignores IGNITE_QUIET system property

ue. I'll added you to > contributor's list. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4248 > > Vladimir. > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello everyone. > > > > I want to pick up http

Re: Sort nodes in the ring in order to minimize the number of reconnections

- etc. Maybe it'll be better to use some metrics from ClusterMetrics interface. The algorithm of ordering can be implemented in a class such as Comparator and use it when we build a cluster or we select a place for a new node. -- With best regards, Vyacheslav Daradur 2016-12-22 13:59 GMT+03:00

Question about OBJ binary representation

Hello everyone. Please, explain me, in which cases at marshalling after object header (24 bytes) it needs to write Class.getName? I understand that it means that this class isn't registered in BinaryContext, and at deserializing we use it for loading Class with ClassLoader. Please explain real

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

Following second question. In which cases it needs to write postWriteHashCode? 2017-03-23 12:27 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > Hello everyone. > > Please, explain me, in which cases at marshalling after object header (24 > bytes) it needs to write Cl

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

t; * or it should be accessible via the configured class loader > * or optimized marshaller should be used and peer class loading is > enabled. > > 2017-03-24 12:02 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > > > Alexey, one more question. > > > > I

Re: Question about OBJ binary representation

ementations of original classes are never used to > > compute hash codes for corresponding binary objects. > > > > - Alex > > > > 2017-03-23 12:58 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > > > Following second question. > &g

ignite-4884 - ready for review (Visorcmd - minor text mistake)

Hello everyone. Looks like minor mistake. Please review if someone has time. -- Best Regards, Vyacheslav

Real size of a stored data in IgniteCache

Hello everyone. How do I know real size of a stored data in the IgniteCache? For example: I created new cache and put one object, and I want to know real size of one object in cache. try (Ignite ignite = Ignition.start("cache-config.xml")) { IgniteCache cache =

Re: Real size of a stored data in IgniteCache

> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello everyone. > > > > How do I know real size of a stored data in the IgniteCache? > > > > For example: I created new cache and put one object, and I want

Re: Real size of a stored data in IgniteCache

oesn't provide such methods. > > However, you can see how it is overcome in one of EvictionPolicy > > implementations and make a proposal how it could be implemented. > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: >

Re: ignite-3592 is ready fo review (Provide some kind of pluggable compression SPI support)

Solution implemented in core-level and works with binary-marshaller. If you about the cache queries - it works with compressed data. 2017-03-29 21:42 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan : > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > > > Hello

Re: ignite-3592 is ready fo review (Provide some kind of pluggable compression SPI support)

methods BinaryObjectImpl#field and BinaryObjectImpl#fieldByOrder 2017-03-29 21:47 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Solution implemented in core-level and w

Re: ignite-3592 is ready fo review (Provide some kind of pluggable compression SPI support)

0/files#diff-a4b76c24a5f9bc9e78d7cff0a7645328 [4] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1650/files#diff-c19a9df4058141d059bb577e75244764 2017-03-29 23:16 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> &

ignite-3592 is ready fo review (Provide some kind of pluggable compression SPI support)

Hello everyone. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3592 is ready for review. ci.tests [1] look good. Upsource review was created.[2] Solution provides 2 way to use compression. 1. Full compression mode. Switches in the IgniteConfiguration#fullCompressionMode field. Full compression

Re: ignite-3592 is ready fo review (Provide some kind of pluggable compression SPI support)

. CPU load estimation with JMH; 4. Tests with different data. 2017-03-30 7:13 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > Sergi, Vovan, > > As SQL and binary marshaller maintainers could you plan to review the > contribution? > > — > Denis > > > On Mar 29,

ignite-4823 - ready for review (SpringCache#putIfAbsent - wrong implementation)

Hello everyone. Please review changes: *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4823 * I found this when I worked on an another issue. If I'm not mistaken it's wrong implementation. -- Best Regards, Vyacheslav

ignite-3682 - GridFunc: move all inner anonymous classes to separate top-level classes.

Hello everyone. I have some questions about the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3682 1) Can I do some minor refactoring of GridFunc class within this task? (to remove unused methods and code duplicates) Or just to extract anonymous classes? 2) Should @Depricated be added to

Re: Write access to Apache Ignite repository

Maybe your key isn't added? https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/isapego 2017-03-20 12:33 GMT+03:00 Igor Sapego : > Denis, > > I've checked again and I get this message when I try to push my patch to > ignite-2.0 branch: > > remote: Permission to apache/ignite.git

Re: ignite-3682 - GridFunc: move all inner anonymous classes to separate top-level classes.

I've received answers in the issue. Ready for review. 2017-03-16 10:14 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > Hello everyone. > > I have some questions about the issue https://issues.apache. > org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3682 > > 1) Can I do some minor refac

Re: ignite-4823 - ready for review (SpringCache#putIfAbsent - wrong implementation)

Valentin, ok, thank you. 2017-03-16 18:39 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>: > Vyacheslav, > > I will review and merge in nearest time. > > -Val > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com&

Re: ignite-3592 is ready fo review (Provide some kind of pluggable compression SPI support)

Guys, any thoughts? I'm ready to improve quickly the solution according to yours notes to include this in the Ignite-2.0. 2017-03-31 12:30 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > Hello everyone. > > I have prepared the raw evaluation (marshaller layer) of compr

question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

Hello Igniters! I have one conceptual question: When we put an object in IgniteCache, how it is stored? As I understand, after marshalling we have an array of bytes, 1) in a local node it is wrapped in BinaryObjectImpl and stored in memory 2) it is sent to remote node as byte array where it

Re: build failure in the master branch

Does anyone has the same problem? 2017-04-12 12:30 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > Last commit [1] 12.04.2017 6:19:06 > > mvn -X clean package -DskipTests > > result: > *** > [DEBUG] parsing done in 2ms. > JavaDoc error: 'Other Packages' sect

build failure in the master branch

Last commit [1] 12.04.2017 6:19:06 mvn -X clean package -DskipTests result: *** [DEBUG] parsing done in 2ms. JavaDoc error: 'Other Packages' section should not be present, all packages shou ld have corresponding documentation groups: C:\Users\SBT-Daradur-V\Projects\igni

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

, operation the entry will be serialized into the binary format > and transferred over the wire. > > — > Denis > > > On Apr 12, 2017, at 1:11 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello Igniters! > > > > I have one conceptu

Re: ignite-3682 - GridFunc: move all inner anonymous classes to separate top-level classes.

l/1652/files BTW, looks unusually that the master-branch contains separate commits of this task. 2017-04-12 19:13 GMT+03:00 Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>: > Vyacheslav, > > thank you for contribution! Your changes are merged into master branch. > > On Mon, Mar 20, 20

Re: Data compression in Ignite 2.0

Alexey, Yes, I've read it. Ok, let's discuss about public API design. I think we need to add some a configure entity to CacheConfiguration, which will contain the Compressor interface implementation and some usefull parameters. Or maybe to provide a BinaryMarshaller decorator, which will be

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > 1. When you transfer an object over the wire or put it into a persistent > store (withKeepBinary property enabled) then only the byte array is used. > 2. No > > — > Denis > > > On Apr 15, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <dar

question: IgniteCache - lock an entry by a key in ATOMIC mode

Hi Igniters! Does IgniteCache provide any tools to set a lock to a key in ATOMIC atomicity mode? -- Best Regards, Vyacheslav

Re: build failure in the master branch

Rishi, thank you. It is building well, with commits before 12.04.17 2017-04-12 15:37 GMT+03:00 Rishi Yagnik <rishiyag...@gmail.com>: > I build it last night it worked for me..I am using Jdk8-121, hope that > helps .. > > Take Care, > Rishi > > > On Apr 12, 2017,

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

on demand? 2017-04-12 22:34 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > A Java wrapper around an actual binary byte array with some additional > fields and methods to work with the serialized data. > > — > Denis > > > On Apr 12, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur

Re: Synchronize method across Ignite cluster

know the context of this task) 2017-04-13 16:06 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com>: > Vyacheslav, > > Explicit cache locks, DataStructures (eg. reentrant locks), transactions, > etc. > We have all of them and even more :) > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at

Synchronize method across Ignite cluster

Hi Igniters! I need to synchronize a method across a Ignite cluster, which work with IgniteCache. Does Ignite provide any tools for? For example: *** Lock lock = cache.lock(key); lock.lock(); try { // todo somethink } finally { lock.unlock(); } *** -- Best Regards, Vyacheslav

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

> > — > Denis > > > On Apr 13, 2017, at 12:21 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Denis, thank you for answers. > > > > I meant another. > > > > For example: > > Cache queries use a BinaryObjectImpl a

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

<dma...@apache.org>: > If a serialized object is stored in an on-heap cache then it will be > wrapped by BinaryObjectImp but if it’s an off-heap cache then > BinaryObjectOffHeapImpl is used instead. > > — > Denis > > > On Apr 14, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Vyacheslav Dara

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

re there any cases of described (1,2) situations. If yes, which cases? 2017-04-15 23:44 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>: > If we use a cache which is configured to use binary mashaller: > 1. In which cases a placed in the cache object (serialized object) won't >

Re: ignite-4804 - ready for review (Remove duplicated properties in parent-pom)

thing should be > resolved after that. > > — > Denis > > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > I'm talking about: > > > > - master-branch had 2 dublicated propertie

Re: ignite-4804 - ready for review (Remove duplicated properties in parent-pom)

; > — > Denis > > > On Mar 9, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone. > > > > Please review changes. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4804 > > > > I found this mistake when I

Re: ignite-4804 - ready for review (Remove duplicated properties in parent-pom)

e more dublicated property []. Am I missing something here? 2017-03-10 23:16 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > The commit will be merged to ignite-2.0 the next time when the branches > will be put in sync. > > — > Denis > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Vyache

Re: Ignite 2.0 - Update Spring dependency to latest stable version

gt; > — > Denis > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:59 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone! > > > > There are no changes long ago: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4211 > > > > Is it actual? > >

Ignite 2.0 - Update Spring dependency to latest stable version

Hello everyone! There are no changes long ago: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4211 Is it actual?

Re: IGNITE-3422 - ready for review

e emerges and asks that he needs it then we will close it > later on. > > — > Denis > > > On Mar 1, 2017, at 12:11 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Guys, any thoughts? > > > > 2017-02-23 13:22 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur &l

Re: question: How data are stored in IgniteCache?

nsert or update a record using > “INSERT * ..” or “UPDATE * …” statements. Take a look at the code. > > — > Denis > > > On Apr 17, 2017, at 5:04 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>> When you transfer an object over the wire

Build warning: duplicated dependency in the core module.

Hi Igniters. I found an issue wich may affect on builing of the core module. I created a ticket[1] and prepared PR[2] with TC-tests[3] Could someone review it? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5882 [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2366/files [3]

Re: Ignite.close(), G.stop(name, true). Change flag cancel to false

Hi guys, I'll just add my opinion if you don't mind. > May be we should implement Vladimir's suggestion to flush the pages without > respect to the cancel flag? Are there any thoughts on this? I think It's good suggestion. But in case of unit-testing a developer usually call #stopAllGrids() at

Nodes which started in separate JVM couldn't stop properly (in tests)

Hi Igniters, Working on my task I found a bug at call the method #stopGrid(name), it produced ClassCastException. I created a ticket[1]. After it was fixed[2] I saw that nodes which was started in a separate JVM could stay in process of operation system. It was fixed too, but not sure is it

How to add new build-plan in the TeamCity?

Hi Igniters! I am working on new test module in the Ignite project [1]. I need check than it will work in the TeamCity [2]. I have no permissions to create new configuration. How to add new build-plan in the TeamCity according to test-suite within new module? [1]

Testing of backward compatibility in Ignite

Hi Igniters. There is a need to test backward compatibility with previous release within a task[1]. As far as I understand: it needs to provide methods in the Ignite-test-framework to start instance of specific version of Ignite. I popose to add such api in the project, for example: "Ignite

Re: Ignite 2.1?

As far as I know, It will be shortly after the end of the vote. [1] Of course only in case of vote success. Vote started yesterday, and must finish tomorrow. Let's hope to see the new release by the end of this week. [1]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC3

+1 Build success now. Node starts without issues. 2017-07-21 11:38 GMT+03:00 Kozlov Maxim : > +1 > > > 21 июля 2017 г., в 7:48, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> написал(а): > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Sasha Belyak

Re: Fix for enum marshalling

Hi Nikita. Thanks for the contribution! If you are curious in BinaryMarshaler and want to continue improve it, please, take a look to a task [1] [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3244 2017-07-21 12:53 GMT+03:00 Nikita Amelchev : > Hi, Igniters. > I fixed

Re: Non-UTF-8 string encoding support in BinaryMarshaller (IGNITE-5655)

Hi Andrey. Sound very useful. We can save one byte if will use controlled overflow on [nonNegativeIntStrLen]: If [nonNegativeIntStrLen < 0] then [string is encoded] I have some questions: Will there any public API, e.g. "Encoder" interace? Will user have the opportunity to define own encoding

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC4

+1 2017-07-25 2:02 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko : > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > wrote: > > > Anton, > > > > You should treat this vote as a brand new vote. According to Apache > rules, > > you need

Re: Non-UTF-8 string encoding support in BinaryMarshaller (IGNITE-5655)

Vladimir, > When we finish varlen optimization for string lengths, I am afraid we could > end up with very messy protocol, should we mix encoded length and encoding. I agree, we shouldn't mix it. > I deemed it's unusual to make two differerent type markers (flags) for > single datatype. I can't

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC2

uot;dos" What's wrong? Do I need to upgrade Maven version? 2017-07-19 13:11 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>: > Hi Vyacheslav > > The build procedure has been changed for 2.1 Take a look in DEVNOTES.txt > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Vyacheslav Darad

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC2

Hi guys. I've downloaded apache-ignite-2.1.0-src.zip, unpack it and execute "mvn package -DskipTests" result is succes, but the folder "target" in the root directory is empty. I've checked it at two diffrenet machines. Is logic of packaging changed in the release? 2017-07-19 12:36 GMT+03:00

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC2

can't build from zip? > Tag' and zip' content should be the same. > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Vyacheslav, this same problem on maven 3.5.0 (zip archive), but build > > success git tag name 2.1.0-rc2. > > &

Re: Make Teamcity Green Again

Hi guys. I vote for #MakeTeamcityGreenAgain. :-) FYI: it had been described and supported previously[1] After the completion of my current task I will try to help with this activity. [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Test-failures-td14353.html 2017-07-21 12:39

Re: Problem with setting up .NET dev environment

dk1.8.0_131\jre > > It is the same on the two of my machines which i tried it on lately(one is > working and another is not) > > On 28 June 2017 at 13:01, Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Could you provide some information about versions of JDK and Maven

Re: Apache Ignite 2.1 scope

t;> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Well, let me propose the following milestones for 2.1 releas

Re: Apache Ignite Site Changed its Face

Looks great! "Keep calm and join the dark side" :-) 2017-07-28 19:54 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda : > Right, embrace the power of the dark side :) > > — > Denis > > > On Jul 28, 2017, at 1:22 AM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > > > > Looks like we're going over the

Warning of building was resolved

Hi Igniters, There was warning of building of the core module[1]. The reason was guava-dependency duplication in pom.xml I removed outdated dependency and warning was gone. I checked compilation with clean local repo, it passed well. My fix was merged to the master branch, thanks to Anton

Re: #MakeTeamCityGreenAgain IGNITE-5866

Great start! Thanks! 2017-08-01 14:54 GMT+03:00 Николай Ижиков : > Hello, Igniters. > > Alexey Goncharuk just merged my fix of IGNITE-5866 to master. > > I fix filter in MetadataJob for `cache.context().queries().sqlMetadata()` > function > > It means that 4 other tests

  1   2   3   4   5   >