Re: Name of .Net product
+1 Ignite.NET 2015-10-07 18:31 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>: > Technically, "Apache Ignite" is the project trademark (which could be > registered, if needed). Hence the longer name is probably more correct. > > Cos > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:31AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > +1 for Ignite.NET or Apache Ignite.NET. I think both should be valid. > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Raul, good point! > > > > > > I have no information about .Net trademark, but other products use > ".NET" > > > without a blank space. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > I like Ignite.NET. > > > > > > > > I wonder if the .NET portion may be trademarked by Microsoft. If > that's > > > the > > > > case, I guess we cannot put a blank space between Ignite and .NET > (Ignite > > > > .NET), it'll all need to be a single word, like proposed. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > *Raúl Kripalani* > > > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big > Data and > > > > Messaging Engineer > > > > http://about.me/raulkripalani | > http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > > > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Vladimir Ozerov < > voze...@gridgain.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is > > > > referenced > > > > > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for > .Net", > > > > > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc.. > > > > > > > > > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as > > > > "[Product].NET". > > > > > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET. > > > > > > > > > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache > Ignite.NET". > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas or objections? > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Gianfranco Murador Igniter and Software Engineer.
Re: Name of .Net product
I like Ignite.NET. I wonder if the .NET portion may be trademarked by Microsoft. If that's the case, I guess we cannot put a blank space between Ignite and .NET (Ignite .NET), it'll all need to be a single word, like proposed. Regards, *Raúl Kripalani* PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and Messaging Engineer http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Igniters, > > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is referenced > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for .Net", > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc.. > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as "[Product].NET". > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET. > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache Ignite.NET". > > Any ideas or objections? > > Vladimir. >
Re: Name of .Net product
+1 Ignite.NET On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:27 PM, chandresh pancholi < chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com> wrote: > What abount "Ignite DotN". > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I like "Ignite.NET". > > > > Sergi > > > > 2015-10-07 15:04 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is > > referenced > > > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for .Net", > > > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc.. > > > > > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as > > "[Product].NET". > > > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET. > > > > > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache Ignite.NET". > > > > > > Any ideas or objections? > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > > > > -- > Chandresh Pancholi > Senior Software Engineer > Flipkart.com > Email-id:chandresh.panch...@flipkart.com > Contact:08951803660 >
Re: Name of .Net product
I like "Ignite.NET". Sergi 2015-10-07 15:04 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>: > Igniters, > > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is referenced > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for .Net", > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc.. > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as "[Product].NET". > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET. > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache Ignite.NET". > > Any ideas or objections? > > Vladimir. >
Re: Name of .Net product
+1 for Ignite.NET or Apache Ignite.NET. I think both should be valid. On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Raul, good point! > > I have no information about .Net trademark, but other products use ".NET" > without a blank space. > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: > > > I like Ignite.NET. > > > > I wonder if the .NET portion may be trademarked by Microsoft. If that's > the > > case, I guess we cannot put a blank space between Ignite and .NET (Ignite > > .NET), it'll all need to be a single word, like proposed. > > > > Regards, > > > > *Raúl Kripalani* > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and > > Messaging Engineer > > http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is > > referenced > > > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for .Net", > > > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc.. > > > > > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as > > "[Product].NET". > > > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET. > > > > > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache Ignite.NET". > > > > > > Any ideas or objections? > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > >
Re: Name of .Net product
Technically, "Apache Ignite" is the project trademark (which could be registered, if needed). Hence the longer name is probably more correct. Cos On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:31AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > +1 for Ignite.NET or Apache Ignite.NET. I think both should be valid. > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > Raul, good point! > > > > I have no information about .Net trademark, but other products use ".NET" > > without a blank space. > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: > > > > > I like Ignite.NET. > > > > > > I wonder if the .NET portion may be trademarked by Microsoft. If that's > > the > > > case, I guess we cannot put a blank space between Ignite and .NET (Ignite > > > .NET), it'll all need to be a single word, like proposed. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > *Raúl Kripalani* > > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and > > > Messaging Engineer > > > http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is > > > referenced > > > > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for .Net", > > > > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc.. > > > > > > > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as > > > "[Product].NET". > > > > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET. > > > > > > > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache Ignite.NET". > > > > > > > > Any ideas or objections? > > > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > > > >
