RE: Semaphore action

2016-01-19 Thread Andrey Kornev
IgniteFuture extended JUC's Future! Is there any particular reason it doesn't? Regards Andrey > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:28:24 +0300 > Subject: Re: Semaphore action > From: yzhda...@apache.org > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > > I like the idea. Couple of comments though. > &

Re: Semaphore action

2016-01-18 Thread Yakov Zhdanov
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:27 AM > Subject: RE: Semaphore action > To: <dev@ignite.apache.org> > > >Vladisav, > > It would be great if you could implement the enhancements! > > And while we're at it, here's something else

Re: Semaphore action

2016-01-18 Thread Vladisav Jelisavcic
Andrey Kornev <andrewkor...@hotmail.com> > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:27 AM > > Subject: RE: Semaphore action > > To: <dev@ignite.apache.org> > > > > > >Vladisav, > > > > It would be great if you c

RE: Semaphore action

2016-01-17 Thread Andrey Kornev
Just to clarify, 7.4 below refers to GridGain 7.4, which is Ignite 1.4. _ From: Andrey Kornev <andrewkor...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:27 AM Subject: RE: Semaphore action To: <dev@ignite.apache.org>

RE: Semaphore action

2016-01-17 Thread Andrey Kornev
icient, reduces the pressure on Ignite's thread pools and prevents thread starvation, and so on. Regards Andrey > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:40:53 +0100 > Subject: Re: Semaphore action > From: vladis...@gmail.com > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > > It does sounds like a useful a

Re: Semaphore action

2016-01-16 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Andrey, In general this seems like a good addition. However, I do not understand how you can specify an executor, given that execution could happen remotely. Can you please clarify? D. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Andrey Kornev wrote: > Hi there, > > The