With 10 +1's; none of the -1's or 0's the [VOTE] has passed.
Thanks everyone for voting!
Cos
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:30PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Igni
+1 [binding]
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:30PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a positio
+1 (binding)
2015-10-14 18:08 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov :
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Gianfranco Murador
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > 2015-10-14 15:46 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > --Yakov
> > >
> > > 2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konsta
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Gianfranco Murador
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> 2015-10-14 15:46 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotat
+1 (binding)
2015-10-14 15:46 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> +1 (binding)
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> > propose
> > that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair r
+1 (binding)
--Yakov
2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position
+1 (binding)
Sergi
2015-10-14 10:28 GMT+03:00 Raul Kripalani :
> +1 (binding)
> On 13 Oct 2015 23:27, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> > propose
> > that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rot
+1 (binding)
On 13 Oct 2015 23:27, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an
+1 (binding)
On 10/14/2015 1:30 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Hi!
As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose
that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
basis. The proposed policy is this:
- a position of an Apache Ignite
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a posit
+1
--
Nikita Ivanov
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
>
Hi!
As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose
that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
basis. The proposed policy is this:
- a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
- after a year passes it is expect
12 matches
Mail list logo