Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-22 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Anton,

Can you please close this ticket if you are done with it?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226

D.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Anton Vinogradov 
wrote:

> Versions updated.
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> avinogra...@gridgain.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Seems everything is ok,
> >
> > https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final=1.5.0-b1
> > https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final=1.5.0-final
> >
> > I'll update versions.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> > avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Dmitriy,
> >>
> >> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break
> something
> >> else.
> >> I'll check it today.
> >>
> >> Raul,
> >>
> >> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> >> dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I filed the ticket:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
> >>>
> >>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
> >>>
> >>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
> >>>
> >>> D.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to
> rush
> >>> and
> >>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
> >>> >
> >>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in
> >>> the
> >>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
> >>> and
> >>> > incompatibilities.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cos
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> >>> > > Cos,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
> >>> chances
> >>> > > for one more delay.
> >>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> >>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
> >>> 1.x.0.final
> >>> > as
> >>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with
> some
> >>> > other
> >>> > > case.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Raul & Sergi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
> >>> case?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> >>> > avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Yakov,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> >>> > > > <
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >>> >
> >>> > was
> >>> > > > correct.
> >>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
> >>> > > > <
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >>> >
> >>> > -
> >>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
> >>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> >>> yzhda...@apache.org>
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
> >>> that
> >>> > > >> correct?
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> Yakov
> >>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > Cos
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> >>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> >>> > yzhda...@apache.org>
> >>> > > >> > wrote:
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You
> can
> >>> > build
> >>> > > >> > ignite
> >>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >>> > > >> > > >
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> >>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> >>> > included
> >>> > > >> > OSGi.
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
> >>> actually
> >>> > built
> >>> > > >> > the
> >>> > > >> > > release from?
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> >>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
> >>> Big
> >>> > Data
> >>> > > >> and
> >>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> >>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> >>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-22 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Seems everything is ok,

https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final=1.5.0-b1
https://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.5.0.final=1.5.0-final

I'll update versions.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Anton Vinogradov  wrote:

> Dmitriy,
>
> that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
> else.
> I'll check it today.
>
> Raul,
>
> Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan  > wrote:
>
>> I filed the ticket:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
>>
>> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
>>
>> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
>> and
>> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
>> >
>> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
>> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion
>> and
>> > incompatibilities.
>> >
>> > Cos
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
>> > > Cos,
>> > >
>> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
>> chances
>> > > for one more delay.
>> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
>> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
>> 1.x.0.final
>> > as
>> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
>> > other
>> > > case.
>> > >
>> > > Raul & Sergi,
>> > >
>> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good
>> case?
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
>> > avinogra...@gridgain.com
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Yakov,
>> > > >
>> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
>> > > > <
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>> >
>> > was
>> > > > correct.
>> > > > 1.5.0-b1
>> > > > <
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
>> >
>> > -
>> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
>> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is
>> that
>> > > >> correct?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Yakov
>> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik" 
>> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Cos
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
>> > yzhda...@apache.org>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
>> > build
>> > > >> > ignite
>> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
>> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
>> > included
>> > > >> > OSGi.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you
>> actually
>> > built
>> > > >> > the
>> > > >> > > release from?
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
>> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration,
>> Big
>> > Data
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
>> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>
>
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-22 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Dmitriy,

that's not a big change, but we have to check it will not break something
else.
I'll check it today.

Raul,

Could you please check this solution is suitable for OSGi?

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan 
wrote:

> I filed the ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226
>
> I think we should change dash to dot for now.
>
> Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?
>
> D.
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik 
> wrote:
>
> > Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush
> and
> > produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
> >
> > There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
> > versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion and
> > incompatibilities.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> > > Cos,
> > >
> > > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no
> chances
> > > for one more delay.
> > > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> > > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 &
> 1.x.0.final
> > as
> > > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
> > other
> > > case.
> > >
> > > Raul & Sergi,
> > >
> > > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> > avinogra...@gridgain.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yakov,
> > > >
> > > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> > > > <
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >
> > was
> > > > correct.
> > > > 1.5.0-b1
> > > > <
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3
> >
> > -
> > > > now correct too, was fixed.
> > > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> > > >> correct?
> > > >>
> > > >> Yakov
> > > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik"  wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Cos
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> > yzhda...@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
> > build
> > > >> > ignite
> > > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> > included
> > > >> > OSGi.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually
> > built
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > release from?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big
> > Data
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> > > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-21 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush and
produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.

There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion and
incompatibilities.

Cos

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> Cos,
> 
> I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no chances
> for one more delay.
> Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 & 1.x.0.final as
> a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some other
> case.
> 
> Raul & Sergi,
> 
> Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?
> 
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov  > wrote:
> 
> > Yakov,
> >
> > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> > 
> >  was
> > correct.
> > 1.5.0-b1
> > 
> >  -
> > now correct too, was fixed.
> > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> >> correct?
> >>
> >> Yakov
> >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik"  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >> >
> >> > Cos
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
> >> > ignite
> >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
> >> > OSGi.
> >> > >
> >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
> >> > the
> >> > > release from?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data
> >> and
> >> > > Messaging Engineer
> >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-21 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
I filed the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2226

I think we should change dash to dot for now.

Anton, can you explain why this is a big change?

D.

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik  wrote:

> Well, being too close to the release doesn't mean that we need to rush and
> produce yet another one that will be causing troubles downstream.
>
> There's nothing to research really. Just dump the string suffixes in the
> versions and be happy. They are solving nothing, but create confusion and
> incompatibilities.
>
> Cos
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:32PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> > Cos,
> >
> > I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no chances
> > for one more delay.
> > Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
> > Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 & 1.x.0.final
> as
> > a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some
> other
> > case.
> >
> > Raul & Sergi,
> >
> > Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> avinogra...@gridgain.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Yakov,
> > >
> > > ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> > > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3>
> was
> > > correct.
> > > 1.5.0-b1
> > > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=f51c051d1e588855c37774efb22cd3536f512aa3>
> -
> > > now correct too, was fixed.
> > > Both (now) points to the same commit.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> > >> correct?
> > >>
> > >> Yakov
> > >> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik"  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> > >> >
> > >> > Cos
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > >> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <
> yzhda...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can
> build
> > >> > ignite
> > >> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > >> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have
> included
> > >> > OSGi.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually
> built
> > >> > the
> > >> > > release from?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > >> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big
> Data
> > >> and
> > >> > > Messaging Engineer
> > >> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > >> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-18 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Cos,

I'm affraid that we already too close to release that we have no chances
for one more delay.
Also we should research how to fix this issue in correct way.
Possible we have to replace "-" with "." and gain 1.x.0.b1 & 1.x.0.final as
a result, but I'm not sure it will not break compatibility with some other
case.

Raul & Sergi,

Could you please check that usage of "." instead of "-" is a good case?

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov  wrote:

> Yakov,
>
> ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1
> 
>  was
> correct.
> 1.5.0-b1
> 
>  -
> now correct too, was fixed.
> Both (now) points to the same commit.
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> wrote:
>
>> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
>> correct?
>>
>> Yakov
>> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik"  wrote:
>>
>> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
>> >
>> > Cos
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
>> > ignite
>> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
>> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
>> > OSGi.
>> > >
>> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
>> > the
>> > > release from?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
>> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data
>> and
>> > > Messaging Engineer
>> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>> >
>>
>
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-17 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Yakov,

ignite-1.5.0-b1-rc1

was
correct.
1.5.0-b1

-
now correct too, was fixed.
Both (now) points to the same commit.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Yakov Zhdanov  wrote:

> Cos, rc tag was fine. Problem was with release one. Anton V. is that
> correct?
>
> Yakov
> On Dec 18, 2015 10:32, "Konstantin Boudnik"  wrote:
>
> > Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit?
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build
> > ignite
> > > > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> > > to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included
> > OSGi.
> > >
> > > Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built
> > the
> > > release from?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > *Raúl Kripalani*
> > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data
> and
> > > Messaging Engineer
> > > http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-17 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
Was VOTE done against the tag pointed to the incorrect commit? 

Cos

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:59PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov  wrote:
> 
> > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
> > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >
> 
> Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included OSGi.
> 
> Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built the
> release from?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> Messaging Engineer
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-14 Thread Romain Gilles
Hi Igniters,
Yes but could please provide a push that includes the ignite osgi stuffs?
Regards,

Romain

Le lun. 14 déc. 2015 à 07:27, Dmitriy Setrakyan  a
écrit :

> Igniters,
>
> Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> which were addressed or are being addressed.
>
> Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
>
> D.
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-14 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Raul,

Tag 1.5.0-b1 fixed, please check.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Raul Kripalani  wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Yakov Zhdanov 
> wrote:
>
> > osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
> > binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.
> >
>
> Then the 1.5.0-b1 tag is incorrect. It points
> to 9a14d6432932fc1a1fdf2ddd77dea920382efe8c which would have included OSGi.
>
> Could you please fix the tag to point to the commit you actually built the
> release from?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and
> Messaging Engineer
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-14 Thread Yakov Zhdanov
Romain,

osgi has been pushed to 1.5 after b1 has been built. You can build ignite
binaries from ignite-1.5 branch to test the functionality.

--Yakov

2015-12-14 12:21 GMT+03:00 Romain Gilles :

> Hi Igniters,
> Yes but could please provide a push that includes the ignite osgi stuffs?
> Regards,
>
> Romain
>
> Le lun. 14 déc. 2015 à 07:27, Dmitriy Setrakyan  a
> écrit :
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> > which were addressed or are being addressed.
> >
> > Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
> >
> > D.
> >
>


Re: 1.5 GA

2015-12-14 Thread Yakov Zhdanov
Guys,

Here is the list of open issues for 1.5
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.5%20AND%20status%20!%3D%20closed%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC

I see 58 items in this list, however 17 are resolved and 4 are in patch
available state.

The most critical issues are assigned to
Alexey Goncharuk
Semyon Boikov
Artem Shutak
Vladimir Ozerov
Pavel Tupitsyn
Vladimir Ershov

I think we can release GA when mentioned guys finish with their tickets. I
think this is possible to accomplish prior to Wed Dec 16 evening. Remaining
tickets can be moved further.

I also want to ask everyone having resolved tickets to look them through
and close or reassign properly:
Raul Kripalani
Cos Boudnik
Denis Magda
Igor Sapego

Thanks!

--Yakov

2015-12-14 9:26 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :

> Igniters,
>
> Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
> which were addressed or are being addressed.
>
> Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?
>
> D.
>


1.5 GA

2015-12-13 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Igniters,

Since we have releases 1.5-b1, the community has reported several issues,
which were addressed or are being addressed.

Would it be realistic to plan releasing GA by the end of the week?

D.