Re: Binary mode for Data Structures
IGNITE-1144 has been fixed so at least that obstacle is out of the way :-) On 2/24/2016 9:10 AM, Denis Magda wrote: The community has already faced with the issue that the binary mode is not supported for data structures. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2339 I've linked this ticket into IGNITE-2701. -- Denis On 2/23/2016 4:29 AM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: +1 to this change. It sounds like a very important feature for collocated queues, especially after [1] is fixed. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1144 -Val On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote: No replies, so I've created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2701 On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote: Igniters, Currently we don't have binary mode (withKeepBinary) in Data Structures (Queue, AtomicReference). Are there any plans for implementing this, or may be a workaround? Lack of binary mode prevents us from implementing IgniteQueue in .NET (.NET types in most cases can't be deserialized in Java). AtomicReference is already implemented, and it works because values are wrapped in GridCacheAtomicReferenceValue. So there is inconsistent behavior between data structures. Thoughts? -- -- Pavel Tupitsyn GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com -- -- Pavel Tupitsyn GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com
Re: Binary mode for Data Structures
No replies, so I've created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2701 On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Igniters, > > Currently we don't have binary mode (withKeepBinary) in Data Structures > (Queue, AtomicReference). > Are there any plans for implementing this, or may be a workaround? > > Lack of binary mode prevents us from implementing IgniteQueue in .NET > (.NET types in most cases can't be deserialized in Java). > > AtomicReference is already implemented, and it works because values are > wrapped in GridCacheAtomicReferenceValue. So there is inconsistent behavior > between data structures. > > Thoughts? > > -- > -- > Pavel Tupitsyn > GridGain Systems, Inc. > www.gridgain.com > -- -- Pavel Tupitsyn GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-2701) Binary mode in Data Structures
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-2701: -- Summary: Binary mode in Data Structures Key: IGNITE-2701 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2701 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement Components: data structures Affects Versions: 1.1.4 Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn Fix For: 1.6 Add binary mode (withKeepBinary) to Data Structures (Queue, AtomicReference). This will allow retrieving values in binary format when needed or when class is not available, and will allow implementing these structures in other platforms (.NET, C++). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Binary mode for Data Structures
Igniters, Currently we don't have binary mode (withKeepBinary) in Data Structures (Queue, AtomicReference). Are there any plans for implementing this, or may be a workaround? Lack of binary mode prevents us from implementing IgniteQueue in .NET (.NET types in most cases can't be deserialized in Java). AtomicReference is already implemented, and it works because values are wrapped in GridCacheAtomicReferenceValue. So there is inconsistent behavior between data structures. Thoughts? -- -- Pavel Tupitsyn GridGain Systems, Inc. www.gridgain.com
