Hi Denis,
This is not what I want ,but it works for my service.
Thank you!
Jiang
> 在 2015年11月11日,下午9:00,Denis Magda 写道:
>
> Hi Jiang,
>
> I'm a bit confused why you can't give different names to the services located
> in different modules. If each
Hi,
As I understand both servers have different implementations but the
names of those implementations are the same, correct?
Because otherwise I don't see how your code could get to the point of
checksum validation if one implementation's name is ServiceEntity while
the other's is
Hi,
I'm against optional checksum verification. It's not safe, adds one more
configuration property and I don't see any use case that can require this.
I also don't completely understand what you're trying to achieve. Can you
please describe the sequence of serialization/deserialization events
Hi:
The implementations name maybe not same.
Like my example:
class DataEntity {
Integer id;
string name;
Integer age;
….. and other
Externalizable.read(in){
Hi guys:
I’m using ignite 1.4.
In IgniteCompute.call will transfer of an object to the cluster.
The object should implement Serializable or Externalizable interface.
OptimizedClassDescriptor.read method will check whether the object is in
the same class.
In my use
wmz7year created IGNITE-1854:
Summary: OptimizedClassDescriptor verifyChecksum object set as
optional
Key: IGNITE-1854
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1854
Project: Ignite