Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-02 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Thanks. Ticket created - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18327 пт, 2 дек. 2022 г. в 15:25, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>: > Visor has a 'cache -clear' function, this function is very useful, > especially in some O scenarios. > > Because Ignite does not support the TRUNCATE

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-02 Thread 18624049226
Visor has a 'cache -clear' function, this function is very useful, especially in some O scenarios. Because Ignite does not support the TRUNCATE command, it is necessary to provide a high-performance clear table data command. 在 2022/12/2 19:13, Nikolay Izhikov 写道: THanks, Slava, Stephen.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-02 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
THanks, Slava, Stephen. Ticket to reimplement cache scan created - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18320 пт, 2 дек. 2022 г. в 13:30, Stephen Darlington < stephen.darling...@gridgain.com>: > One option that’s in Visor but not control.sh is the ability to view cache > content (cache

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-02 Thread Stephen Darlington
One option that’s in Visor but not control.sh is the ability to view cache content (cache -scan). I do hear of people using that. > On 2 Dec 2022, at 09:17, Andrey Mashenkov wrote: > > Hi Igniters, > > I agree with Slava, we have to provide alternative ways for users before > dropping a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-02 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi Igniters, I agree with Slava, we have to provide alternative ways for users before dropping a feature that just worked. A user may use some feature for a long time without any issues, so, this is why there is no mention in chats/mails. I mean here, the feature is not only the whole visor

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-02 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Slava. > However, do we have a list of useful features that do not exist in our control utility? I don't have the list on hand. Do you have some feature in mind that must be transferred in control.sh? I don't find any mentions of visorcmd on user list and in user chats so my guess is -

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Вячеслав Коптилин
Hi Igniters, I fully support the idea to stop supporting Visor and removing its implementation. However, do we have a list of useful features that do not exist in our control utility? Perhaps, it makes sense to reimplement such functionality and provide it based on control.sh script. Thanks,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
PR is ready for review - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/10411 чт, 1 дек. 2022 г. в 16:49, Taras Ledkov : > Hi, > > +1 for remove Visor related code. > Unfortunately we have to migrate `control-utility` to use IgniteClient > (thin client) before drop GridClient. I guess we will do it in

Re:[DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-12-01 Thread Taras Ledkov
Hi, +1 for remove Visor related code. Unfortunately we have to migrate `control-utility` to use IgniteClient (thin client) before drop GridClient. I guess we will do it in the future. Also, the old thin JDBC based on the GridClient (classes placed at the org.apache.ignite.internal.jdbc.*) must

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-11-30 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
+1 This module seems to be completely abandoned чт, 1 дек. 2022 г., 00:46 Ilya Kasnacheev : > Hello! > > Let's go ahead and remove what we don't use. Most of that stuff is deep > legacy, even if it contains some rare gems of functionality that nobody > knows how to use anymore. > > Regards, >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd

2022-11-30 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! Let's go ahead and remove what we don't use. Most of that stuff is deep legacy, even if it contains some rare gems of functionality that nobody knows how to use anymore. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 30 нояб. 2022 г. в 20:12, Nikolay Izhikov : > Hello, Igniters. > > There are legacy